good luck! you have awesome numbers. god, how i wish i had those 3 little LSAT pointslz06 wrote:If I'm in the 2/9 batch, which I assume that I am because I applied early Sept., I should be getting my mail today.. I'm nervous
Columbia 2010 Forum
- hannah87
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:37 am
Re: Columbia 2010
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
After the events of 2/11, I feel like I'd be overjoyed with a WL. Anything to not get flat-out dinged.
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I am scared to get my mail..
-
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Me too seriously0L Hoping for 1 wrote:I am scared to get my mail..
- PoorOrpheus
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:57 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Were there any acceptances in the postmarked 2/9 batch?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Georgina got in.PoorOrpheus wrote:Were there any acceptances in the postmarked 2/9 batch?
- GobiasIndustries
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Rejections are out and about; this is true. Got mine yesterday (I mentioned but maybe it got lost among everyone else's WL). The rejection letter is somewhat dismissive, actually, now that I've given it another look. Kind of meh about that.
GL to all the waiters, though...
GL to all the waiters, though...
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:47 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I was in the 2/9 as well, also admitted.PoorOrpheus wrote:Were there any acceptances in the postmarked 2/9 batch?
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
GobiasIndustries, don't renege on your promise to post what it said...GobiasIndustries wrote:Rejections are out and about; this is true. Got mine yesterday (I mentioned but maybe it got lost among everyone else's WL). The rejection letter is somewhat dismissive, actually, now that I've given it another look. Kind of meh about that.
GL to all the waiters, though...
- GobiasIndustries
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Oh yeah!blue5385 wrote:GobiasIndustries, don't renege on your promise to post what it said...GobiasIndustries wrote:Rejections are out and about; this is true. Got mine yesterday (I mentioned but maybe it got lost among everyone else's WL). The rejection letter is somewhat dismissive, actually, now that I've given it another look. Kind of meh about that.
GL to all the waiters, though...
I'll translate:CLS Ownage Squad wrote:After careful consideration of your application for admission, we regret to inform you that we are unable to take favorable action.
During this admissions season, we expect over 8,000 candidates will seek admission to our entering class, numbering approximately 370 students. This year's applicant pool promises to be among the largest and most highly qualified in our history. Competition for admission has never been more keen. We share your disappointment that, with such an abundance of highly qualified applicants for so relatively few openings, we are unable to accept many candidates who we felt would have made a significant contribution to our Law School.
Thank you for your interest in Columbia Law School and for your personal investment in our selection process. We wish you much success and satisfaction at your law school of choice and beyond, throughout your career.
Thx bebe but it's not happening. Oh stop making that face; it's harder for us because there were a ton of people we wanted to accept but couldn't. Not you, though. We waitlisted them. Please don't try to transfer; it will further embarass you and waste our time.
- Snoopy1216
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 12:32 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
People who have been rejected, when was it postmarked and where did it go/are u in the US (or abroad)?
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Columbia 2010
lol, I think the first sentence is harsh, but the rest of it is pretty standard. I will probably be getting my very own copy in the mail today, if what happened to the rest of the people in this thread is any indicationGobiasIndustries wrote:Oh yeah!blue5385 wrote:GobiasIndustries, don't renege on your promise to post what it said...GobiasIndustries wrote:Rejections are out and about; this is true. Got mine yesterday (I mentioned but maybe it got lost among everyone else's WL). The rejection letter is somewhat dismissive, actually, now that I've given it another look. Kind of meh about that.
GL to all the waiters, though...
I'll translate:CLS Ownage Squad wrote:After careful consideration of your application for admission, we regret to inform you that we are unable to take favorable action.
During this admissions season, we expect over 8,000 candidates will seek admission to our entering class, numbering approximately 370 students. This year's applicant pool promises to be among the largest and most highly qualified in our history. Competition for admission has never been more keen. We share your disappointment that, with such an abundance of highly qualified applicants for so relatively few openings, we are unable to accept many candidates who we felt would have made a significant contribution to our Law School.
Thank you for your interest in Columbia Law School and for your personal investment in our selection process. We wish you much success and satisfaction at your law school of choice and beyond, throughout your career.
Thx bebe but it's not happening. Oh stop making that face; it's harder for us because there were a ton of people we wanted to accept but couldn't. Not you, though. We waitlisted them. Please don't try to transfer; it will further embarass you and waste our time.
- rockchalk86
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Place on first reserve! Pretty excited about this considering my numbers.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- GobiasIndustries
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Letter was dated 2/9 and it arrived yesterday at my perm address in CT.Snoopy1216 wrote:People who have been rejected, when was it postmarked and where did it go/are u in the US (or abroad)?
- castellon
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:19 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
No mail again, I guess no mail > rejection or hold, although a rejection at this point might be a mercy killing.
- PoorOrpheus
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:57 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
OT: Is that Jacques Brel in your avatar? Love him!castellon wrote:No mail again, I guess no mail > rejection or hold, although a rejection at this point might be a mercy killing.
- castellon
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:19 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Bien sûr! Jacques is (was?) the man.PoorOrpheus wrote:OT: Is that Jacques Brel in your avatar? Love him!castellon wrote:No mail again, I guess no mail > rejection or hold, although a rejection at this point might be a mercy killing.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- UrbanAchievers
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:02 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
WL'd today via snail mail post marked 2/10. Not surprised with my 4.2 index.
Withdrawing my application. Good luck to the rest of you.
Withdrawing my application. Good luck to the rest of you.
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:04 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I just realized we are numbers twins. I thought I had a shot at an outright admittance, and you probably have a better shot than I do because of your military experience. On LSN, there have been a number of people with similar or lower numbers admitted. But maybe getting into NYU made me overconfident.big_blue79 wrote:Got a complete e-mail. I expect to be W/L (3.8/173). Best of luck to everyone.
-
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:41 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Unable to take favorable action, lol what
- BaiAilian2013
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Nothing for me today. After Coal hears, I will assume that a dog ate my application.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Fixt.lz06 wrote:Un[strike]able[/strike]willing to take favorable action, lol what
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:04 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I went complete on 1/21, I think, but have not gone under review yet. Is there a stage for under review, or does it just go from complete to decision?
- Core
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
General question: Is "held" (at CLS, HLS, etc.) the equivalent of being "deferred," or does "deferred" have some other meaning?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Fixed.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:[strike]How[/strike] Why do people keep changing their names?kittenmittons wrote:
I like your new name
Gargamel, please tell.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login