U Chicago 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby 02082010 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:38 am

boo_pragmatism wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:Almost had a heart attack when I saw 3 pages were added to this thread over the course of the day. It seems like no ED'ers updated today. I think the first ED decisions really won't be released until Monday, possibly w/ a few RD sprinkled in, but I don't think the early RD people will hear until after the new year.

I'm going nuts, man. You?


After not hearing anything for the last 5 weeks, I'm just ready to get some decisions.

oneforship
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby oneforship » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:42 am

little late, but if anyone is still interested, my status did not update, 175/3.16, UR 11/25.

User avatar
Kronk
Posts: 28128
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Kronk » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:53 am

Didn't RD people hear back right before Christmas last year?

User avatar
moonshine
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:35 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby moonshine » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:54 am

i am RD, complete 10/13, and updated to UR 12/8

hiro86
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby hiro86 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:14 am

As someone said earlier, those who have updated appear to be all Sep. applicants from what I have seen. I would guess it does not mean anything good or bad in terms of likely outcome.

User avatar
gotmilk?
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:25 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby gotmilk? » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:15 am

hopefulundergrad wrote:
boo_pragmatism wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:Almost had a heart attack when I saw 3 pages were added to this thread over the course of the day. It seems like no ED'ers updated today. I think the first ED decisions really won't be released until Monday, possibly w/ a few RD sprinkled in, but I don't think the early RD people will hear until after the new year.

I'm going nuts, man. You?


After not hearing anything for the last 5 weeks, I'm just ready to get some decisions.


holy crap. seriously... three new pages. and nothing affecting me. ED, and mine did not update either. not sure what this means in terms of when we hear back. hopefully thursday/friday. probably not till monday. good luck to everyone, and RD people: try not to freak us ED people out with your petty little updates! :D

User avatar
ontologyfail
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby ontologyfail » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:27 am

The Sept. completes updating theory is correct. From the Twitter feed:

Normal for your app to be at complete status for several weeks. We review in the order apps are completed and started with Sept. completes.

User avatar
5ky
Posts: 6380
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby 5ky » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:32 am

.
Last edited by 5ky on Mon Oct 19, 2015 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:52 am

hiro86 wrote:As someone said earlier, those who have updated appear to be all Sep. applicants from what I have seen. I would guess it does not mean anything good or bad in terms of likely outcome.

Not sure what it means, but I was complete really early (9/8) and updated to UR on 11/25 with the first batch, but I did NOT update to UR 12/14 (or whatever people have been showing today).

~170, ~3.9

User avatar
of Benito Cereno
Posts: 748
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby of Benito Cereno » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:07 am

complete november 2nd

3.58 / 178

no update, no under review

laolbjob
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 4:24 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby laolbjob » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:41 am

crackberry wrote:
hiro86 wrote:As someone said earlier, those who have updated appear to be all Sep. applicants from what I have seen. I would guess it does not mean anything good or bad in terms of likely outcome.

Not sure what it means, but I was complete really early (9/8) and updated to UR on 11/25 with the first batch, but I did NOT update to UR 12/14 (or whatever people have been showing today).

~170, ~3.9


You already have stanford in the pocket.. what else do you want///?!!

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:45 am

laolbjob wrote:
crackberry wrote:
hiro86 wrote:As someone said earlier, those who have updated appear to be all Sep. applicants from what I have seen. I would guess it does not mean anything good or bad in terms of likely outcome.

Not sure what it means, but I was complete really early (9/8) and updated to UR on 11/25 with the first batch, but I did NOT update to UR 12/14 (or whatever people have been showing today).

~170, ~3.9


You already have stanford in the pocket.. what else do you want///?!!


Hahaha, he has a point, crackberry. Don't tell me that you're biting your nails over Chicago. Is your devotion to Stanford less profound than we think? Or are you more like me than you claim? :P

EDIT: No offense meant, just trying to have a little fun with you after your wonderful news.
Last edited by CardinalRules on Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Reinhardt
Posts: 458
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:27 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Reinhardt » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:54 am

I haven't been obsessively paying attention to the status checker, but mine says UR 12/8. I applied RD mid Octoberish.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Tue Dec 15, 2009 6:06 am

msoftceo wrote:I haven't been obsessively paying attention to the status checker, but mine says UR 12/8. I applied RD mid Octoberish.


Good for you! I'm afraid that I can't claim the same nonchalance.

User avatar
nixxers
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:47 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby nixxers » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:38 am

fwiw complete 10/21, still not under review

Amelie
Posts: 814
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Amelie » Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:39 am

nixxers wrote:fwiw complete 10/21, still not under review


+1

User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby kittenmittons » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:18 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
kittenmittons wrote:Above median GPA
75th LSAT
Complete 10/22

No update


Oh, if kittenmittons is part of the non-update group, I'm definitely taking it as a bad sign.


Thanks bro

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:17 pm

laolbjob wrote:
crackberry wrote:
hiro86 wrote:As someone said earlier, those who have updated appear to be all Sep. applicants from what I have seen. I would guess it does not mean anything good or bad in terms of likely outcome.

Not sure what it means, but I was complete really early (9/8) and updated to UR on 11/25 with the first batch, but I did NOT update to UR 12/14 (or whatever people have been showing today).

~170, ~3.9


You already have stanford in the pocket.. what else do you want///?!!

I'm actually sending out most of my withdrawal (is that the right word?) emails today, including Chicago, but they don't know that yet, so I figured it might be useful information for the people who are stressing over it.

User avatar
Revisionist
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:44 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Revisionist » Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:07 pm

I also had my under review date change yesterday. I applied in September with an above median LSAT and sub-25th GPA.

User avatar
uganik
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:40 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby uganik » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:40 pm

arb44 wrote:My UR updated from 11/25 to 12/14

I would love to think it was positive, but I just can't get my hopes up, not with exams right now.

Complete on 9/25
LSAT 172 GPA below 25%

Oh, and I am RD


I'm complete on 9/25 as well with UR updated 11/25 & 12/14.

I believe the assertion that these changes pertain largely to September applicants is correct.

User avatar
JollyGreenGiant
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby JollyGreenGiant » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:49 pm

Chicago ain't lying. They do look at applicants chronologically. I went complete 11/04 so hopefully I'm coming up soon. A Christmas acceptance would make my holidays a little more cheery. :o

User avatar
Walfredo47
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Walfredo47 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:57 pm

Under Review 12/14, went complete back in september. For the moment, I am suscribing to the "Chronological Theory" as well.

Decisions at the end of the week, maybe? 8)

lz06
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:41 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby lz06 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:27 pm

Hm I've been complete since 9/11 but my under review hasn't updated since 11/25

oregoniangal
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:54 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby oregoniangal » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:39 pm

anybody else have a "class deposit 0.00" on the application status checker? my file is complete, not under review (went complete early nov), so why the tease?

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Dec 15, 2009 5:44 pm

oregoniangal wrote:anybody else have a "class deposit 0.00" on the application status checker? my file is complete, not under review (went complete early nov), so why the tease?

That's there for everyone and has been the whole time.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests