U Chicago 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:30 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?


I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.


unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.


bigcoffee ftw!

User avatar
ClemCarter
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby ClemCarter » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:30 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?


I made it through about a minute and a half of the pilot before realizing I probably should be studying for finals. I'm still open to the possibility of watching and catching up, though. Unless people on here spoil it by giving away the plot...............



Spoiler alert: Serena sleeps with everyone.

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:31 pm

puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?


I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.


unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.


but you have to hold his feet while I hold his arms!


Wait, are we still talking about gossip girl?

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:32 pm

Helmholtz wrote:Wait, are we still talking about gossip girl?


:wink:

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:33 pm

ClemCarter wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?


I made it through about a minute and a half of the pilot before realizing I probably should be studying for finals. I'm still open to the possibility of watching and catching up, though. Unless people on here spoil it by giving away the plot...............



Spoiler alert: Serena sleeps with everyone.


Guest star?
Image

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:33 pm

puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
puppins wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:so does this mean that you're catching up so that you, me, clem, and puppins can all watch gg together next year?


I can't wait to hold helm down, ruffle his hair a little, and force him to watch gg.


unfortunately i probably wont be around to participate since instead of going to law school i am going to have to start working at starbucks again or something. if i really kick it into high gear i think i can make manager by 25.


but you have to hold his feet while I hold his arms!


i guess i could rearrange some shifts. i mean my client roster is so big (i make great lattes) that i'm not even worried about podunk things like billable drip coffees anymore.

User avatar
ClemCarter
Posts: 248
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:09 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby ClemCarter » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:34 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
Guest star?
-other serena-



Well-played, sir. Well-played.

User avatar
puppleberry finn
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby puppleberry finn » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:34 pm

gahthelaw wrote:i guess i could rearrange some shifts. i mean my client roster is so big (i make great lattes) that i'm not even worried about podunk things like billable drip coffees anymore.


<3 <3 <3 yay

User avatar
kittenmittons
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby kittenmittons » Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:38 pm

HopefulUG: You're paper should be five words: lawl at John Maynard Keynes

hesitantstyle
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:32 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby hesitantstyle » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:22 pm

anyone else go under review today?

aluminummonster
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:46 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby aluminummonster » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:47 pm

is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?

User avatar
babaghanouj
Posts: 278
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:20 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby babaghanouj » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:53 pm

aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?

No.

Welcome aboard.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=98250

User avatar
AngryAvocado
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby AngryAvocado » Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:55 pm

aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?


Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.

User avatar
echoi
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:15 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby echoi » Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:56 pm

<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.

User avatar
CardinalRules
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby CardinalRules » Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:57 pm

AngryAvocado wrote:
aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?


Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.


What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby 02082010 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:35 pm

managamy wrote:
AngryAvocado wrote:
aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?


Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.


What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???

I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby 02082010 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:40 pm

boo_pragmatism wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.

They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?


Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:55 pm

hopefulundergrad wrote:
boo_pragmatism wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.

They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?


Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.

Is that true for RD too or just ED?

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby 02082010 » Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:57 pm

crackberry wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:
boo_pragmatism wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.

They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?


Yup. It'll go decision pending, calls will go out (sometimes over two or three days) and then everyone else will change to decision mailed.

Is that true for RD too or just ED?


Same for everyone.

User avatar
ontologyfail
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby ontologyfail » Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:43 am

boo_pragmatism wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.

They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?


Anyone know if they make international calls?

02082010
Posts: 2034
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby 02082010 » Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:08 pm

ontologyfail wrote:
boo_pragmatism wrote:
hopefulundergrad wrote:I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.

They call the acceptances and snail mail anything else, right?


Anyone know if they make international calls?


Probably an email with your decision attached with a PDF, if you're admitted of course. Otherwise probably UPS or Fedex.

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:34 pm

echoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.


ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to me

0L Hoping for 1
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby 0L Hoping for 1 » Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:35 pm

gahthelaw wrote:
echoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.


ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to me


+1111

She looks gross.

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:38 pm

0L Hoping for 1 wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:
echoi wrote:<3 Jenny Humphrey. So hot.


ugh really? too skinny and bird-y looking to me


+1111

She looks gross.

--ImageRemoved--


also prepubescent looking, no matter how much makeup they put on her

Image

User avatar
AngryAvocado
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby AngryAvocado » Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:41 pm

hopefulundergrad wrote:
managamy wrote:
AngryAvocado wrote:
aluminummonster wrote:is there any concrete reason to believe that just because a new batch of people went under review today, ED'ers will hear back this week?


Don't think so. Columbia didn't start accepting people until after next week last year, and I don't see any reason why things would be different this year.


What does Columbia's trends have to do with Chicago???

I assume he meant Chicago, but ED'ers will change to decision pending either at the end of this or at the end of next week. Done and done.


Yep, meant to say Chicago. Glad to hear it changes to Decision Pending...that's should relieve some of the randomness/anxiety of waiting (unlike CLS/NYU...grrr).




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], BobBoblaw, KatCoco, Lumis, Yahoo [Bot] and 13 guests