Page 62 of 181

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:42 pm
by GeePee
Congratulations to all of the admits!! And good luck to all those who plan to attend!

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:42 pm
by hiro86
I just noticed that my Chicago status checker does not have a phone number listed... strange. Anyone else not have their number listed on their status checker? One possible explanation for why I got an e-mail but no call.
Update: Just checked the app I submitted and my phone number was on there, so that probably is not the reason.

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:45 pm
by Vegas_Rebel
tintin wrote:IM IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so incredibly stoked!!!! never thought i'd have a chance...
:mrgreen: :mrgreen:

UR 12/26 --> 1/12

3.9/168

got the call about half an hour ago...and an email too!
Image

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:45 pm
by georgina
hiro86 wrote:I just noticed that my Chicago status checker does not have a phone number listed... strange. Anyone else not have their number listed on their status checker? One possible explanation for why I got an e-mail but no call.
interesting, AGAIN. thanks hiro.
strangely, my phone number on this app is my parents number (perm address) rather than my cell.
oy, must hunt down mother.

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:47 pm
by tintin
Vegas_Rebel wrote:
Image
that sums up how i feel right now!

i wish i could buy everyone in this thread a drink!!! i can't celebrate too hard tonight cuz I have work at 6am tomorrow....ah well!

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:49 pm
by clint4law
Anyone else still UR since 1/11?

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:00 pm
by CardinalRules
You should cheer up knowing that my phone was silent today too. (I was UR 12/31 and 01/13.) Chicago may be my first non-fan of the cycle...hahahaha. :P

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:02 pm
by Helmholtz
managamy wrote:You should cheer up knowing that my phone was silent today too. (I was UR 12/31 and 01/13.) Chicago may be my first non-fan of the cycle...hahahaha. :P
ibtb

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:03 pm
by GeePee
Helmholtz wrote:
managamy wrote:You should cheer up knowing that my phone was silent today too. (I was UR 12/31 and 01/13.) Chicago may be my first non-fan of the cycle...hahahaha. :P
ibtb
too late

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:04 pm
by CardinalRules
boo_pragmatism wrote:
managamy wrote:You should cheer up knowing that my phone was silent today too. (I was UR 12/31 and 01/13.) Chicago may be my first non-fan of the cycle...hahahaha. :P
You just don't get it, do you? My distaste for you has nothing to do with how your cycle is going. It has everything to do with the fact that you are a douche who rubs his success in the face of others and refused to withdraw from schools he knew he wouldn't attend.
I wasn't speaking specifically to you.

What is "ibtb?"

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:08 pm
by ki3ngar0o
+1

go boo! :D

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:11 pm
by NancyBotwin
managamy wrote:What is "ibtb?"
You're about to find out. :lol:

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:14 pm
by mozhou7
managamy wrote:
mozhou7 wrote:
mozhou7 wrote:
uganik wrote:How many out there with a 1/12 UR and no call?

Have any 1/12's received emails with rejections/waitlists?
No call here...170&174/4.0
Let me take that back...

In via e-mail...no call...just like upenn.
Are you an international student?
Canadian

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:14 pm
by psychomohel
boo_pragmatism wrote:
managamy wrote:You should cheer up knowing that my phone was silent today too. (I was UR 12/31 and 01/13.) Chicago may be my first non-fan of the cycle...hahahaha. :P
You just don't get it, do you? My distaste for you has nothing to do with how your cycle is going. It has everything to do with the fact that you are a douche who rubs his success in the face of others and refused to withdraw from schools he knew he wouldn't attend.

+1

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:16 pm
by CardinalRules
NancyBotwin wrote:
managamy wrote:What is "ibtb?"
You're about to find out. :lol:
Ummm???? I'm terrible with acronyms.

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:17 pm
by NancyBotwin
Damn, apparently there's more than one "ibtb" now and I guessed the wrong one.

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:18 pm
by capitalacq
managamy wrote:
NancyBotwin wrote:
managamy wrote:What is "ibtb?"
You're about to find out. :lol:
Ummm???? I'm terrible with acronyms.
it will become clear soon enough and you'll have an "ahhh" moment

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:35 pm
by humdrum
georgina wrote:end of their business day. ugh; still UR 11/25
me too. I was originally complete 9/17 -> UR 9/29.

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:06 pm
by AngryAvocado
Well, I have some good news for those of us who didn't get a call today. According to LSN, U-Chi spread their first big wave of RD acceptances over 2 days the past couple of years. It does seem like this round is largely limited to people that went complete before November, though, so keep that in mind. The big wave for those of us who submitted in November didn't happen until a few weeks later (end of Jan last year, prob early February or so this year).

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:09 pm
by CardinalRules
AngryAvocado wrote:Well, I have some good news for those of us who didn't get a call today. According to LSN, U-Chi spread their first big wave of RD acceptances over 2 days the past couple of years. It does seem like this round is largely limited to people that went complete before November, though, so keep that in mind. The big wave for those of us who submitted in November didn't happen until a few weeks later (end of Jan last year, prob early February or so this year).
Thanks, Avocado!

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:18 pm
by thalassocrat
AngryAvocado wrote:Well, I have some good news for those of us who didn't get a call today. According to LSN, U-Chi spread their first big wave of RD acceptances over 2 days the past couple of years. It does seem like this round is largely limited to people that went complete before November, though, so keep that in mind. The big wave for those of us who submitted in November didn't happen until a few weeks later (end of Jan last year, prob early February or so this year).
According to their Twitter account they're finished for the week. Maybe there will be more on Tuesday, assuming they take Monday off.

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:29 pm
by squelp
In via email! Take that Penn waitlist!

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 9:34 pm
by Emma.
Helmholtz wrote:
managamy wrote:You should cheer up knowing that my phone was silent today too. (I was UR 12/31 and 01/13.) Chicago may be my first non-fan of the cycle...hahahaha. :P
ibtb
We can only hope....



...you, OTOH can do something about it!

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:28 pm
by thorntll
tintin wrote:
Vegas_Rebel wrote:
Image
that sums up how i feel right now!

i wish i could buy everyone in this thread a drink!!! i can't celebrate too hard tonight cuz I have work at 6am tomorrow....ah well!
Tin Tin, you have GOT to stop being so pessimistic! On every thread, you're like, "I'm getting rejected today, I know it." And then you get in! Let this be a lesson to you.

Re: U Chicago 2010

Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:30 pm
by thorntll
psychomohel wrote:
boo_pragmatism wrote:
managamy wrote:You should cheer up knowing that my phone was silent today too. (I was UR 12/31 and 01/13.) Chicago may be my first non-fan of the cycle...hahahaha. :P
You just don't get it, do you? My distaste for you has nothing to do with how your cycle is going. It has everything to do with the fact that you are a douche who rubs his success in the face of others and refused to withdraw from schools he knew he wouldn't attend.

+1
I'm sorry dude, but I have to agree with this. You may mean well, I don't know; it's hard to tell when you can't actually see the person. But damn, it comes off pretty bad.