U Chicago 2010

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
zoey15
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:12 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby zoey15 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:08 pm

why am i still Complete 11/12? Anyone else?

Grr

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:15 pm

georgina wrote:
Helmholtz wrote:
Drew2010 wrote:Is there anyone with an UR date which didn't change?


Stuck at 12/21. :(


Stuck at UR 11/25!

+1. Man, it feels like I've been there forever. Submitted the first week of September and still UR 11/25.

I think this is a mixed batch, btw, but that is just pure speculation.
Last edited by crackberry on Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lermontov
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Lermontov » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:15 pm

Damn Chicago telemarketers to Hell!

Even though I didn't update along with everyone else. Still.

User avatar
Drew2010
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:21 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Drew2010 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:17 pm

crackberry wrote:
I think this is a mixed batch, btw, but that is just pure speculation.


I agree

CyLaw
Posts: 1557
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:59 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby CyLaw » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:19 pm

Drew2010 wrote:
crackberry wrote:
I think this is a mixed batch, btw, but that is just pure speculation.


I agree


Fairly confident this is a mixed batch. Doesn't chicago do most things in chronological order? So we should expect most batches to be a mixed.

seamonkey
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:46 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby seamonkey » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:21 pm

zoey15 wrote:why am i still Complete 11/12? Anyone else?

Grr


I'm in the same boat, zoey. :(

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:21 pm

CyLaw wrote:
Drew2010 wrote:
crackberry wrote:
I think this is a mixed batch, btw, but that is just pure speculation.


I agree


Fairly confident this is a mixed batch. Doesn't chicago do most things in chronological order? So we should expect most batches to be a mixed.

Yeah but the first batch was all acceptances and plenty of schools do a few batches of acceptances before rolling out the WL/rejects.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:22 pm

Hey georgina, when did you submit/go complete?

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:22 pm

oooooo.

i guess shaking the monitor worked!

UR 11/25 -- UR 1/12!
Last edited by gahthelaw on Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:23 pm

gahthelaw wrote:oooooo.

i guess shaking the monitor worked!

UR 11/15 -- UR 1/12!

I assume you meant UR 12/15? I think UR 11/25 was the first UR date...

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:23 pm

crackberry wrote:
gahthelaw wrote:oooooo.

i guess shaking the monitor worked!

UR 11/15 -- UR 1/12!

I assume you meant UR 12/15? I think UR 11/25 was the first UR date...

woops excited typo. hang on i'll go correct.

either way -- 11/25

rogerlodge
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:50 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby rogerlodge » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:24 pm

12/21 to 1/12

georgina
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby georgina » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:27 pm

crackberry wrote:Hey georgina, when did you submit/go complete?


10/8, 10/13. and you submitted september? maybe chicago got harvard's memo to leave you behind? strange.

User avatar
scribelaw
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby scribelaw » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:41 pm

They received my app Jan. 3. I'm in for long wait, alas.

Forgive a basic question: Can anyone provide insight on what U-Chi likes most?...For example, Northwestern like WE and LSAT splitters, Berkeley likes high GPAs and softs, UVA will let you in ED if you have a 3.9/164+.

Anything similar for Chicago?

User avatar
johnstuartmill
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 9:53 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby johnstuartmill » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:46 pm

Chicago is generally kind to high-LSAT splitters. It's also been hypothesized that they favor candidates who would be a good fit for Chicago's intellectual atmosphere.

User avatar
opus127
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:04 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby opus127 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:47 pm

seamonkey wrote:
zoey15 wrote:why am i still Complete 11/12? Anyone else?

Grr


I'm in the same boat, zoey. :(


Me, too. I'm hoping all the date changes today might mean they'll start looking at our batch soon.

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Helmholtz » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:49 pm

johnstuartmill wrote:Chicago is generally kind to high-LSAT splitters. It's also been hypothesized that they favor candidates who would be a good fit for Chicago's intellectual atmosphere.


It's a good thing I used such Brobdingnagian, well-excogitated wording in my PS!!

User avatar
tintin
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby tintin » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:04 pm

my UR date also just changed to 1/12. Does this have any meaning / historical precedent? I really doubt I am going to be getting into chicago hahaahha.

citydweller09
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:10 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby citydweller09 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:08 pm

Hmm, so it's 3, and nothing. Oh well.

User avatar
scribelaw
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby scribelaw » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:10 pm

tintin wrote:my UR date also just changed to 1/12. Does this have any meaning / historical precedent? I really doubt I am going to be getting into chicago hahaahha.


Congrats on the awesome cycle so far!

I bet you have a decent shot at U-Chi, too. That GPA is nice and shiny and you obviously have a good app package, to get into three T-10 schools already.

User avatar
Drew2010
Posts: 418
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:21 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Drew2010 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:12 pm

scribelaw wrote:
tintin wrote:my UR date also just changed to 1/12. Does this have any meaning / historical precedent? I really doubt I am going to be getting into chicago hahaahha.


Congrats on the awesome cycle so far!

I bet you have a decent shot at U-Chi, too. That GPA is nice and shiny and you obviously have a good app package, to get into three T-10 schools already.


No kidding.. I am quite jealous, to be quite honest..

User avatar
gahthelaw
Posts: 728
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby gahthelaw » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:12 pm

citydweller09 wrote:Hmm, so it's 3, and nothing. Oh well.


3:11 and no one has posted anything on TLS yet. we're forgetting the 90% of applicants that aren't on TLS, people who might call their parents before posting, and the fact that maybe whoever's making the phone calls just wanted to cup of coffee first. i wouldn't call today a wash yet. maybe in an hour, but not yet.

Amelie
Posts: 814
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby Amelie » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:14 pm

citydweller09 wrote:Hmm, so it's 3, and nothing. Oh well.


I can't handle these days when I think I may get a call........

User avatar
crackberry
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby crackberry » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:17 pm

georgina wrote:
crackberry wrote:Hey georgina, when did you submit/go complete?


10/8, 10/13. and you submitted september? maybe chicago got harvard's memo to leave you behind? strange.

Colluding bastards...

User avatar
js87
Posts: 434
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:42 pm

Re: U Chicago 2010

Postby js87 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 4:23 pm

UR updated to 1/11... Is this relevant for Chicago? Have people generally gotten acceptances after an update, or is it irrelevant?




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Nayanthika, siyuanff, SNightHighlights and 10 guests