i just laughed out loud in the office at your avatar/handle. good work , although i dont know how you expect people to take anything you say seriouslyagentzer0 wrote:2/4 is definitely a batch of admits. They're due, they said they plan on more calls this week, and everyone who has posted stats looks good for acceptance. My $.02
U Chicago 2010 Forum
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
- rockchalk86
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
I'm not sold that this is exclusively an acceptance batch.... I hope it is though. I have had amazing luck this cycle so maybe it will continue.
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:46 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+1Torvon wrote:I'm pretty sure the only people with UR 2/4 update are those who were complete in November and December. I don't think it's a good or bad sign, just a sign that the decision is coming.
While most people's stats in this batch are trending toward good or very good, there's enough variability and with (seemingly) almost everyone complete in Nov/Dec receiving a 2/4 update, it seems too good to be true that we'll all receive acceptances
With that said, I really hope I'm wrong!
- opus127
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:04 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Along the same lines, does anyone have thoughts about the sheer size of this batch? Is it really possible they could admit all of us, especially considering the number of applications they haven't even gotten to yet?
I guess we should all know soon, at least. Here's hoping for lots of phone calls tomorrow!
I guess we should all know soon, at least. Here's hoping for lots of phone calls tomorrow!
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
It's almost definite that not all the UR 2/4s are acceptances. The 2/4 UR basically means you went into committee review which is where they will decide in, out, WL.
At least, IMO.
At least, IMO.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:49 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Got the update today, too. 171/3.75, complete 12/1 -> UR 1/26 -> 2/1 -> 2/4. It took forever to go UR, but things seem to be moving along pretty speedily. I'm crossing my fingers...
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
You know what buddy, I'm a pessimistic fellow. Let me continue thinking that I'm gonna get WLed.blue5385 wrote:But then what kind of review were people in before the 2/4 update? It seems like almost everyone had a prior update.JollyGreenGiant wrote:It's almost definite that not all the UR 2/4s are acceptances. The 2/4 UR basically means you went into committee review which is where they will decide in, out, WL.
At least, IMO.
( )
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I was complete 11/12 ----> ur 1/11 ----> ur 2/4. Stats are 178/3.75. Wishful thinking is so powerful but I hope you guys are right that 2/4s are admits!
- opus127
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:04 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Wait a minute. Aren't you the one who told me (a couple weeks back now) that our quick turnaround between UR dates meant we'd get in for sure? I like the old thinking better.JollyGreenGiant wrote: You know what buddy, I'm a pessimistic fellow. Let me continue thinking that I'm gonna get WLed.
( )
- TheWire
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
updated to UR 2/4
LSN link in profile
good luck to those waiting
LSN link in profile
good luck to those waiting
- JollyGreenGiant
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I was living in la la land. Then some 173 3.8+ guy on here got WLed.eas331 wrote:Wait a minute. Aren't you the one who told me (a couple weeks back now) that our quick turnaround between UR dates meant we'd get in for sure? I like the old thinking better.JollyGreenGiant wrote: You know what buddy, I'm a pessimistic fellow. Let me continue thinking that I'm gonna get WLed.
( )
I may have dreamt that, but it was a pretty damn real dream if not true.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dontstopbelivin
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
pretty sure I'm not getting in, even with the 2/4 UR update (please prove me wrong Chicago!)
Last edited by dontstopbelivin on Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Did any of the people who updated to 1/12 right before the 1/13 decisions not get accepted?
- monkeygirl
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:52 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Complete in November, UR 1/29, 2/4
Non-traditional student
166/3.67, but I might be considered URM (both for my ethnicity and for my ragingly liberal career goals).
How does Chicago let people know about acceptances?
Non-traditional student
166/3.67, but I might be considered URM (both for my ethnicity and for my ragingly liberal career goals).
How does Chicago let people know about acceptances?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Decidedly not URM.monkeygirl wrote:Complete in November, UR 1/29, 2/4
Non-traditional student
166/3.67, but I might be considered URM (both for my ethnicity and for my ragingly liberal career goals).
How does Chicago let people know about acceptances?
And phone call for acceptances. Email for rejects and WLs.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- holybartender
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I'm curious about this well.AngryAvocado wrote:Did any of the people who updated to 1/12 right before the 1/13 decisions not get accepted?
- homestyle28
- Posts: 2362
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 12:48 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Chiming in here UR 12/? (Honestly, don't remember the exact date, like the 12th maybe?) --> 1/11--> 2/4
175/ 3.07 GPA (but a couple grad degrees with 3.9+ FWIW) I'm guessing WL
175/ 3.07 GPA (but a couple grad degrees with 3.9+ FWIW) I'm guessing WL
- monkeygirl
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:52 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Thanks, crackberry!crackberry wrote:Decidedly not URM.monkeygirl wrote:Complete in November, UR 1/29, 2/4
Non-traditional student
166/3.67, but I might be considered URM (both for my ethnicity and for my ragingly liberal career goals).
How does Chicago let people know about acceptances?
And phone call for acceptances. Email for rejects and WLs.
I actually had an adviser tell me NOT to apply to Chicago because they were "too conservative." Clearly, I didn't listen to her, but I've always wondered if I would fit in, seeing as I've turned more idealistic as I've gotten older.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
1. Couldn't tell if you were being facetious.monkeygirl wrote:Thanks, crackberry!
I actually had an adviser tell me NOT to apply to Chicago because they were "too conservative." Clearly, I didn't listen to her, but I've always wondered if I would fit in, seeing as I've turned more idealistic as I've gotten older.
2. The underlined is the opposite direction most people take. What's the saying? "If you're not liberal when you're young, you don't have a heart. If you're not conservative when you're old, you don't have a brain." Something like that.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
#2 is Churchill.crackberry wrote:1. Couldn't tell if you were being facetious.monkeygirl wrote:Thanks, crackberry!
I actually had an adviser tell me NOT to apply to Chicago because they were "too conservative." Clearly, I didn't listen to her, but I've always wondered if I would fit in, seeing as I've turned more idealistic as I've gotten older.
2. The underlined is the opposite direction most people take. What's the saying? "If you're not liberal when you're young, you don't have a heart. If you're not conservative when you're old, you don't have a brain." Something like that.
- holybartender
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:06 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Churchill I think.crackberry wrote:1. Couldn't tell if you were being facetious.monkeygirl wrote:Thanks, crackberry!
I actually had an adviser tell me NOT to apply to Chicago because they were "too conservative." Clearly, I didn't listen to her, but I've always wondered if I would fit in, seeing as I've turned more idealistic as I've gotten older.
2. The underlined is the opposite direction most people take. What's the saying? "If you're not liberal when you're young, you don't have a heart. If you're not conservative when you're old, you don't have a brain." Something like that.
edit- blasts
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Knew it.Kretzy wrote:#2 is Churchill.crackberry wrote:1. Couldn't tell if you were being facetious.monkeygirl wrote:Thanks, crackberry!
I actually had an adviser tell me NOT to apply to Chicago because they were "too conservative." Clearly, I didn't listen to her, but I've always wondered if I would fit in, seeing as I've turned more idealistic as I've gotten older.
2. The underlined is the opposite direction most people take. What's the saying? "If you're not liberal when you're young, you don't have a heart. If you're not conservative when you're old, you don't have a brain." Something like that.
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Just checking in,
UR 1/11 ---> 2/4
UR 1/11 ---> 2/4
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login