Top Law Schools

Soooo....

I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.

Your questions answered: --LinkRemoved--

c0rpusdelicti wrote:Soooo....

I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.

OMG! EPIC! CONGRATULATIONS!

PoorOrpheus wrote:

c0rpusdelicti wrote:Soooo....

I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.

OMG! EPIC! CONGRATULATIONS!

AWESOME. There's hope for all of us

Big congrats!

Core wrote:

adameus wrote:maybe he will reject people via the blog.

That would be incredible.

yeah, he could just post a list.
The following people have been rejected. In an attempt to go green we're saving energy by not sending out multiple emails and just notifying everyone via this blog. You were all oustanding and we wish we could accept everyone, but sadly we cannot. I'm sure some of you will get into fantastic schools and some of you (those who had no business applying to Harvard in the first place) may end up at a TTT but good luck to you regardless.

JR.

The List:


Joe Schmoe (TLS name: JS235)
Jane Schmoe (TLS name :JS_Bomber_4)
...

c0rpusdelicti wrote:Soooo....

I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.

Kick-ass! Hopefully this means that the admissions train at Harvard is going to start moving again. . .

Another TLS shoutout from an HYS admissions dean! Now, where's Faye Deal?

Josh Rubenstein wrote:It seems like there are quite a few of you agonizing over being on hold, and many of you seem to have a lot of time to spend on TLS. Relax – there are still places open in the class, and these will be filled by people on hold or whose applications have not been reviewed yet.

Also, subtle pro- or anti-me trolling?!?!

Josh Rubenstein wrote:At this point, your application has been thoroughly reviewed. We’ve got a crack team here, and at least two of us have read your application.

crackberry wrote:Another TLS shoutout from an HYS admissions dean! Now, where's Faye Deal?

Josh Rubenstein wrote:It seems like there are quite a few of you agonizing over being on hold, and many of you seem to have a lot of time to spend on TLS. Relax – there are still places open in the class, and these will be filled by people on hold or whose applications have not been reviewed yet.

Also, subtle pro- or anti-me trolling?!?!

Josh Rubenstein wrote:At this point, your application has been thoroughly reviewed. We’ve got a crack team here, and at least two of us have read your application.

You attention whore!

c0rpusdelicti wrote:Soooo....

I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.

Wow! Congratulations! You give us hope.

c0rpusdelicti wrote:Soooo....

I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.

Boom! Nice work.

Did you have anything substantial in your LOCI that compelled JR to get you out of the hold group?

c0rpusdelicti wrote:Soooo....

I got my J.R.1 this morning! It's scheduled for next Tuesday. Submitted 11/04, Complete 11/12, Held on 1/27, LOCI sent last Wednesday/Thursday.

Congrats!

Sogui wrote:Did you have anything substantial in your LOCI that compelled JR to get you out of the hold group?

+1 I'm interested in knowing what schools want to see. Did you send a new LOR etc?

crackberry wrote:Another TLS shoutout from an HYS admissions dean! Now, where's Faye Deal?

Josh Rubenstein wrote:It seems like there are quite a few of you agonizing over being on hold, and many of you seem to have a lot of time to spend on TLS. Relax – there are still places open in the class, and these will be filled by people on hold or whose applications have not been reviewed yet.

Also, subtle pro- or anti-me trolling?!?!

Josh Rubenstein wrote:At this point, your application has been thoroughly reviewed. We’ve got a crack team here, and at least two of us have read your application.

dude, totally a pro-you troll haha

...

that is almost borderline mean nom

what was? i dont see anything

Thanks for the congrats, everyone. Truth be told, I probably wouldn't have thought to send a LOCI without TLS. So, thanks for that too!

lol at JR mentioning TLS. I'm glad he sees our pain

There has been a rejection:
http://harvard.lawschoolnumbers.com/app ... order=desc

PoorOrpheus wrote:There has been a rejection:
http://harvard.lawschoolnumbers.com/app ... order=desc

if you sort by last updated, there are as many as three!

JR made it seem like hold was actually a positive place to be in his blog. He put such a good spin on it that I now have some false hope.

JR, I was joking earlier and don't actually blame you for my wrist!

$1.99 wrote:JR made it seem like hold was actually a positive place to be in his blog. He put such a good spin on it that I now have some false hope.

really? his blog post actually made me a little sad.

JR wrote:In the last couple of weeks, I’ve started to go back through the holds. Some of you, we’ve already admitted; others have been asked to interview. Don’t freak out if that’s not you. This is a fairly long process, and it will take 6-8 weeks to go through all the applications, at which point some of the remaining holds be shifted to a wait-list.

the tls representation so far: 1 hold was admitted, and 1 hold got a jr1. JR's definition of "some" and "others" seem disheartening to me.

also, his portrayal of the jr1 didn't clear up any of the confusion surrounding the large group of jr1 holds.

PoorOrpheus wrote:There has been a rejection:
http://harvard.lawschoolnumbers.com/app ... order=desc

With almost identical numbers to me. That's discouraging.

well he seemed to imply that jr1 holds got the jr1s because they were more interesting to start with and they applied earlier in general, i think his definition of "some" is "very little".