Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Post
by BigAristotle » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:07 am
betasteve wrote:Vandypepe wrote:SMU has definitely yield protected its way out of some quality students.
I guess that's why it's ranked where it is now.
Looking at LSN over the past years - data doesn't support the assertion that they yield protect.
Betasteve is correct. I noticed a 172/2.2 WL, Accept, and a few 164 low 3.x and 2.x WLs, & 166, 3.36 reject over the past few years lends itself that SMU does not YP, and are LSAT whores.
Rachyk wrote:Does anybody know what time the acceptance calls generally went out? Also did the status checker actually change before it happened? Mine has unfortunately been stuck on complete since 1/22
Does anyone know the answer to this?
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Post
by chadwick218 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:10 am
betasteve wrote:Vandypepe wrote:SMU has definitely yield protected its way out of some quality students.
I guess that's why it's ranked where it is now.
Looking at LSN over the past years - data doesn't support the assertion that they yield protect.
+1 ... agreed ... per LSN going back 4 years, the lowest LSAT score to be rejected was a 158 and the lowest GPA with an LSAT score of at least 158 or higher to be rejected was a 3.36 ...
-
sapereaude2012
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:11 pm
Post
by sapereaude2012 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:27 pm
My theory is that SMU isn't YP'ing but that they have admitted the high numbers that they want for their medians right now, and are waiting to send out admissions to people that don't really help or hurt until they see who is depositing.
If more people with 165 and 3.75 have deposited, they might be more willing to take a 160 3.8 than if the majority of their 165+ scores have been withdrawing. So not really YP in the traditional sense, but essentially the same thing. Somewhat secure their medians, and then let people in as soon as they've done this. Any thoughts?
-
OasisFan
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:48 pm
Post
by OasisFan » Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:32 pm
sapereaude2012 wrote:My theory is that SMU isn't YP'ing but that they have admitted the high numbers that they want for their medians right now, and are waiting to send out admissions to people that don't really help or hurt until they see who is depositing.
If more people with 165 and 3.75 have deposited, they might be more willing to take a 160 3.8 than if the majority of their 165+ scores have been withdrawing. So not really YP in the traditional sense, but essentially the same thing. Somewhat secure their medians, and then let people in as soon as they've done this. Any thoughts?
Ordinarily that is what the "Evening Program" is for though, it's for the students they really liked, but whose numbers would hurt their medians. I think with the PT rankings coming out, some schools are beginning to adopt the same rigid LSAT based admissions practices for their Part-Time programs as well.
-
Rachyk
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:07 am
Post
by Rachyk » Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:48 pm
Well its 3 and still no sign of any phone calls............I guess we are all stuck waiting another week.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
sapereaude2012
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 8:11 pm
Post
by sapereaude2012 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 4:55 pm
betasteve wrote:sapereaude2012 wrote:My theory is that SMU isn't YP'ing but that they have admitted the high numbers that they want for their medians right now, and are waiting to send out admissions to people that don't really help or hurt until they see who is depositing.
If more people with 165 and 3.75 have deposited, they might be more willing to take a 160 3.8 than if the majority of their 165+ scores have been withdrawing. So not really YP in the traditional sense, but essentially the same thing. Somewhat secure their medians, and then let people in as soon as they've done this. Any thoughts?
This sounds like the strategy of every single law school trying to raise their numbers.
Well kind of, but most schools don't leave a large portion of applicants hanging with no response beyond deposit deadlines.
-
Lizzy081881
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:07 pm
Post
by Lizzy081881 » Fri Apr 17, 2009 6:10 pm
So is it the consensus that if we haven't heard yet we may still have a shot? When do they usually send out rejection letters? I'm so nervous!!!
-
eamonbriggs08
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:10 pm
Post
by eamonbriggs08 » Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:35 am
Lizzy081881 wrote:So is it the consensus that if we haven't heard yet we may still have a shot? When do they usually send out rejection letters? I'm so nervous!!!
I think we all are. eek!
-
Go_Canucks!!
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:30 am
Post
by Go_Canucks!! » Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:36 am
Oasis...I'm still hoping you'll get in. What other schools have you applied to ?
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
OasisFan
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:48 pm
Post
by OasisFan » Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:50 am
Go_Canucks!! wrote:Oasis...I'm still hoping you'll get in. What other schools have you applied to ?
I appreciate it...this cycle has been pretty unforgiving to me.
In: Miami
Maybe: American, Tulane
Out: Texas, Baylor (Fall and Summer)
Not Heard: UH, SMU, Maryland, Texas Tech
3.66 and a 159
-
Go_Canucks!!
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:30 am
Post
by Go_Canucks!! » Sat Apr 18, 2009 8:05 pm
Dude congrats !!!! Don't sweat SMU, because you got into a great law school down there in Florida. Did you get a scholarship ?
-
smiley26
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 5:21 pm
Post
by smiley26 » Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:46 am
Just FYI:
Out of Office: letter of continued interest for Dean Keehan - please forward as necessary
From: Keehan, Virginia (
vkeehan@mail.smu.edu)
Sent: Sun 4/19/09 7:45 AM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
I am out of the office on maternity leave. I will be returning at the end of May. Please e-mail
lawadmit@smu.edu for assistance in my absence.
-
kmcquire
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:56 pm
Post
by kmcquire » Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:36 pm
Rachyk wrote:
Does anybody know what time the acceptance calls generally went out? Also did the status checker actually change before it happened? Mine has unfortunately been stuck on complete since 1/22
Does anyone know the answer to this?
I got accepted a long ways back, I can't even remember what month it was, but I do remember that they called me on a Friday morning. I was accepted in the first round of applications with a 164 and a 3.6, but I withdrew my acceptance about a month ago, so I hope someone on here gets my spot!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
OasisFan
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:48 pm
Post
by OasisFan » Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:36 pm
smiley26 wrote:Just FYI:
Out of Office: letter of continued interest for Dean Keehan - please forward as necessary
From: Keehan, Virginia (
vkeehan@mail.smu.edu)
Sent: Sun 4/19/09 7:45 AM
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
I am out of the office on maternity leave. I will be returning at the end of May. Please e-mail
lawadmit@smu.edu for assistance in my absence.
Indeed...she mentioned this at her Evening Program Session, but I honestly don't know how much of a say so she has in the way they make decisions and stuff.
-
BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Post
by BigAristotle » Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:51 am
So discussion around the new USNWR rankings, SMU about the same at 49, same with Houston at 59, Baylor fell 10 to 65 though. Looks like Chadwick was right in his prediction for 2010.
Last edited by
BigAristotle on Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Post
by chadwick218 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:12 am
The pdf that I saw showed SMU falling to a tie at 49 ... gotta be honest here, given that Baylor fell to 65th, it really makes me think twice about attending Baylor ...
-
jadedV
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:06 pm
Post
by jadedV » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:43 am
I know rankings shouldn't mean that much, but I hate to see that SMU fell to #49. I really hope SMU does not fall out of the top 50. But that's just me.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
smiley87
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Post
by smiley87 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:45 am
what SMU needs to do is call back all accepted applicants with 164 and ~3.5 that have withdrawn and offer them more money.... i'd drop every other school for you in a heartbeat, smu. i can be your 25thpercentile!!! call mee!!! please!!! you're my first love!
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Post
by chadwick218 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:45 am
Part-Time Rankings:
1. GULC
2. GW
3. Fordham
4. American
5. GMU
6. Maryland
7. Temple
7. San Diego
9. Denver
10. Chicago Kent
link: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=69258
I am rather surprised that SMU is not on this list ...
-
BigAristotle
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:57 pm
Post
by BigAristotle » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:47 am
----------GPA----------LSAT-------Acceptance%---07 Grads Employed----Bar %
49. SMU--3.29-3.85---154-165-----29%------------81.4%-----------------92.6%
59. UofH--3.12-3.67---154-163-----29%------------80.2%-----------------89.9%
65. Baylor-3.39-3.79---156-162-----33%------------61.2%-----------------98.5%
15. UTexas-3.42-3.82--164-168-----25%------------96.8%-----------------88.5%
TTT
Texas Tech-3.2-3.7----154-159-----34%------------N/A--------------------90.3%
Just for comparison sake; that employment number is staggering though.
Last edited by
BigAristotle on Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Post
by chadwick218 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:52 am
Indeed, that's what did Baylor in this year ... if anything, I am now needing SMU to give me a call more than ever ...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
smiley87
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:00 pm
Post
by smiley87 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:57 am
do you think i could call smu back and said i was joking about withdrawing? my stats are in their median so i might help them out too....
and maybe possibly keep my scholarship if possible?! or is this a little shameless
-
chadwick218
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:15 pm
Post
by chadwick218 » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:04 am
smiley87 wrote:do you think i could call smu back and said i was joking about withdrawing? my stats are in their median so i might help them out too....
and maybe possibly keep my scholarship if possible?! or is this a little shameless
it's worth a try ... just spin it as a family situation is preventing your from attending college elsewhere ...
-
jadedV
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:06 pm
Post
by jadedV » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:24 am
Chadwick, I'm still surprised that they haven't called you yet. Do you think they're holding your application because they've recongized that you've applied twice before and did not attend?
-
jadedV
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:06 pm
Post
by jadedV » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:25 am
PS - Are a ton of Baylor 0L's going to try and jump ship to SMU now?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login