Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
midrangejumper
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:38 am
Post
by midrangejumper » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:26 pm
savanna wrote:midrangejumper wrote:savanna wrote:poodles123 wrote:I don't know if anyone's clarified this yet on this thread, but I just called UF and asked them what the difference is between "under review, decision pending" and "reviewed, decision pending". She said that there is no difference and they both mean the same thing- they're holding onto the application until the end of March/early April. Just thought I'd share.
I think I might call bullshit. If there's no difference, then why would they input two different phrases..??? Seems weird to me. Maybe they just don't want to let us know that one answer means "no" and the other means "WL?"
no more tar pic?
I deleted it after the terror that was inflicted in me from the "admissions superstar" thread.Ahaha..I'm new to message boards..I never know avatars were so bad!
haha ya i would never put up a pic of myself on here! (and im always amazed that people do to be quite honest with you)
though it makes spotting out TLS'ers that you go to LS with a lot easier
-
midrangejumper
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:38 am
Post
by midrangejumper » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:26 pm
Boyk1182 wrote:savanna wrote:poodles123 wrote:I don't know if anyone's clarified this yet on this thread, but I just called UF and asked them what the difference is between "under review, decision pending" and "reviewed, decision pending". She said that there is no difference and they both mean the same thing- they're holding onto the application until the end of March/early April. Just thought I'd share.
I think I might call bullshit. If there's no difference, then why would they input two different phrases..??? Seems weird to me. Maybe they just don't want to let us know that one answer means "no" and the other means "WL?"
If you're right, "Under review" = Hold; "Reviewed" = Rejected
That way I'd have a shot still lol
wow, you actually might be onto something here....
-
Boyk1182
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:24 am
Post
by Boyk1182 » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:29 pm
midrangejumper wrote:Boyk1182 wrote:savanna wrote:poodles123 wrote:I don't know if anyone's clarified this yet on this thread, but I just called UF and asked them what the difference is between "under review, decision pending" and "reviewed, decision pending". She said that there is no difference and they both mean the same thing- they're holding onto the application until the end of March/early April. Just thought I'd share.
I think I might call bullshit. If there's no difference, then why would they input two different phrases..??? Seems weird to me. Maybe they just don't want to let us know that one answer means "no" and the other means "WL?"
If you're right, "Under review" = Hold; "Reviewed" = Rejected
That way I'd have a shot still lol
wow, you actually might be onto something here....
Naw, I think it's all the same really... We're their backups regardless of what it says (as long as they don't send rejection letters)
-
midrangejumper
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:38 am
Post
by midrangejumper » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:34 pm
Boyk1182 wrote:midrangejumper wrote:
Naw, I think it's all the same really...
We're their backups regardless of what it says (as long as they don't send rejection letters)
"I never even got the chance to be some drunk college guy's last resort!!" -Meg Griffin
-
98234872348
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm
Post
by 98234872348 » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:37 pm
.
Last edited by
98234872348 on Thu May 19, 2011 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
pappujd
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:58 am
Post
by pappujd » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:39 pm
I am "Under Review; Decision Pending" since 2/26... I was wondering if it is a good idea to write a LOCI in this situation.
Thanks.
-
midrangejumper
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:38 am
Post
by midrangejumper » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:41 pm
pappujd wrote:I am "Under Review; Decision Pending" since 2/26... I was wondering if it is a good idea to write a LOCI in this situation.
Thanks.
i proposed this earlier, and people seemed to think waiting til you ACTUALLY are given a WL is the best idea
-
Boyk1182
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:24 am
Post
by Boyk1182 » Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:42 pm
mistergoft wrote: If you're right, "Under review" = Hold; "Reviewed" = Rejected
Actually several people on this board went from "Reviewed by committee; Decision Pending" to "Letter in Transit" and received acceptances, so it does not mean rejected...
I know, it was wishful thinking since mine says "Under Review..."
I don't think they should even have status checkers, they just stress people out... reminds me I have to go check mine
-
billykelly76
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:47 pm
Post
by billykelly76 » Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:32 pm
midrangejumper wrote:Edge427 wrote:Yeah, there seems to be three different "decision pending" categories, in no particular order:
Under Review by Committee
Under Review; Decision Pending
Reviewed by Committee; Decision Pending
who here is "under review; decision pending"
I am.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
Edge427
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:15 pm
Post
by Edge427 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:32 am
billykelly76 wrote:midrangejumper wrote:Edge427 wrote:Yeah, there seems to be three different "decision pending" categories, in no particular order:
Under Review by Committee
Under Review; Decision Pending
Reviewed by Committee; Decision Pending
who here is "under review; decision pending"
I am.
+1, with the batch of those who went blank.
Which btw, those who went blank seem to all be UR;DP
And the other group who changed the following week seem to all be "URbC"
-
carine44
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:23 pm
Post
by carine44 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:22 am
mistergoft wrote: If you're right, "Under review" = Hold; "Reviewed" = Rejected
Actually several people on this board went from "
Reviewed by committee; Decision Pending" to "Letter in Transit" and received acceptances, so it does not mean rejected...
Mine just changed to this...I don't want to be too confident but I'm a Florida resident with a 167/3.0/good softs and while I know my GPA is nothing to write home about, I would be surprised if I was rejected outright. I guess we'll see!
-
AJaKe
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:13 am
Post
by AJaKe » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:56 am
.
Last edited by
AJaKe on Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
chitown825
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:45 pm
Post
by chitown825 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:58 am
I also just changed to "Reviewed by committee; decision pending" right now
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
AJaKe
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:13 am
Post
by AJaKe » Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:59 am
.
Last edited by
AJaKe on Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
project40
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:03 pm
Post
by project40 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:00 pm
grr under review decision pending still
-
chitown825
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:45 pm
Post
by chitown825 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:02 pm
160/3.4 w/ outstanding softs and PS
Non resident.
-
AJaKe
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:13 am
Post
by AJaKe » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:05 pm
.
Last edited by
AJaKe on Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Matlock31
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:39 pm
Post
by Matlock31 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:09 pm
I also changed to reviewed by committee; decision pending...
-
Cal4future
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:14 pm
Post
by Cal4future » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:09 pm
It's basically a waitlist/reject list. If you notice on LSN they haven't rejected anyone yet.
While most people with this status are being outright rejected, some of them might be in a maybe pile.
These are my thoughts after talking to the admissions people down in titletown.
EDIT: If you call them and ask if it is appropriate to send a LOCI they will tell you no, that nothing will be added to your file after March 1. However, if you send it directly to the dean or acting dean they will add it for you and be very pleasant about it. Good luck everyone.
-
Rocky Estoppel
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:41 pm
Post
by Rocky Estoppel » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:15 pm
My status checker still says "Under Review by Committee" but the date changed from 3/2 to 3/5.
I'm guessing I'm going into a second round of review. Pure speculation though.
-
hotshotdre
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:22 pm
Post
by hotshotdre » Thu Mar 05, 2009 12:50 pm
Mine also changed to 3/5 and still says "Under Review by committee". I wonder what that means?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
savanna
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:56 pm
Post
by savanna » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:02 pm
I think it's pretty crappy that they haven't rejected ANYONE yet.Surely there are people who have applied that admissions know don't have a shot in hell..and yet they're still not sending rejection letters. I just don't understand the strategy.
-
jpin22
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:02 pm
Post
by jpin22 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:15 pm
I can understand not rejecting alot of people at first, because they probably use some of them for their gpa or lsat score or something that will help the overall class. It is strange that they havent rejected anyone yet but im sure they will be coming here soon.
-
Boyk1182
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:24 am
Post
by Boyk1182 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:16 pm
savanna wrote:I think it's pretty crappy that they haven't rejected ANYONE yet.Surely there are people who have applied that admissions know don't have a shot in hell..and yet they're still not sending rejection letters. I just don't understand the strategy.
I understand the strategey... they don't know that they're going to fill their class 100% full until enough people accept their offer. Theoretically they could screw themselves over if they reject those they expect to reject, and nobody takes an offer to go to their school with higher numbers. It's highly unlikely, but the school has no incentive to reject people early, just keep them waiting until they're happy with their matriculation, and then the 'thanks, but no thanks' letters start poruing out.
-
AJaKe
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:13 am
Post
by AJaKe » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:18 pm
.
Last edited by
AJaKe on Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login