Re: Stanford Law Applicants c/o 2021
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 9:20 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=282156
As a 174 person, can’t say I agree. Haha.Platopus wrote:I think it's probably just a sample size thing, since I have a hard time believing people 1 point higher are just getting complacent, especially since 175+ also sees a little boost. It's just a weird, very encouraging anomaly.rachelac wrote:Plus maybe people with numbers that strong usually apply as K-JD? If I'd had a slightly higher GPA I might've been more likely to consider it, but it seems like Stanford really likes WE#gobroncos wrote:I do also wonder to what extent complacency really does set in among folks with really great numbers. We’d never be able to actually know or quantify that, but maybe it really is that better applicants tend more toward laziness or even self-aggrandizement in their PS, etc. making them WL candidates rather than admits even as folks with lower numbers get in.principalagent wrote:
I suppose they are worried about numbers like every other school and assume 174s would start jumping ship to Harvard and Yale. That number is also Hamilton/Rubenstein territory and maybe they’re attempting to mitigate that risk.
I mean the difference between these (even adjusting the first to 4.0 173 the difference is pretty pronounced:Platopus wrote:You can zoom in on the graphs on LSN. Doing so may illuminate there there a lot more data points that you just aren't seeing.maybeman wrote: Have you guys noticed the discrepancy between the LSN GPA/LSAT grid and MyLSN? I don't know if I'm plugging things in incorrectly or they somehow use different data sets, but the acceptance percentages are different. MyLSN is way more optimistic about my numbers
thank you so much!! This makes me feel a little less awful about my chancesPlatopus wrote:The MyLSN results are only showing the applicants who applied before December. Goes to reason that if you apply Dec-Feb you run a higher risk of riding a WLmaybeman wrote:I mean the difference between these (even adjusting the first to 4.0 173 the difference is pretty pronounced:Platopus wrote:You can zoom in on the graphs on LSN. Doing so may illuminate there there a lot more data points that you just aren't seeing.maybeman wrote: Have you guys noticed the discrepancy between the LSN GPA/LSAT grid and MyLSN? I don't know if I'm plugging things in incorrectly or they somehow use different data sets, but the acceptance percentages are different. MyLSN is way more optimistic about my numbers
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/gpa-3.9/lsat-173
http://mylsn.info/55m7x8/
DistrictDisaster wrote:Submitted yesterday! I did just one extra essay - I felt like one was perfect for me and doing two would be a try-hard moment they'd easily detect. Fingers crossed....
Someone please correct me if this isn't the case at Stanford, but anytime before Thanksgiving is generally considered early in the cycle. It shouldn't be a problem.tuna_wasabi wrote:Guys, how big of a disadvantage will I face if I submit the Stanford app on early November?
Feeling queasy right now...
Especially given that they usually don't admit people until after the New Year, I can't imagine applying in November will be any issue. They'll almost certainly have reviewed your file by the time the first decisions are rendered. A November application shouldn't be any problem.DowsingForAJD wrote:Someone please correct me if this isn't the case at Stanford, but anytime before Thanksgiving is generally considered early in the cycle. It shouldn't be a problem.tuna_wasabi wrote:Guys, how big of a disadvantage will I face if I submit the Stanford app on early November?
Feeling queasy right now...
That's terrible! I hope everything is okay with your living situation.texasreznikoff wrote:stanford outlaws just inadvertently outed me to my dad by sending stuff to my home address that he then opened without my permission
and all for nothing, since i would never even get in!
texasreznikoff wrote:stanford.
it’s all good, i’m not there and he appears to think it was a mistakeSopranoSaxophone wrote:That's terrible! I hope everything is okay with your living situation.texasreznikoff wrote:stanford outlaws just inadvertently outed me to my dad by sending stuff to my home address that he then opened without my permission
and all for nothing, since i would never even get in!