Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Next JS2 wave(s) will be...

Monday 3/27
2
2%
Tuesday 3/28
18
17%
Wednesday 3/29
35
33%
Thursday 3/30
13
12%
Friday 3/31
29
27%
Saturday 4/1
10
9%
 
Total votes: 107

User avatar
chandhi

Gold
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby chandhi » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:14 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!

Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....

LOL this is beautiful. Who is doing this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_schoo ... ted_States

VapidP

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby VapidP » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:15 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!

Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....


What is this wiki?

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1297
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:18 pm

VapidP wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!

Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....


What is this wiki?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_schoo ... ted_States

VapidP

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby VapidP » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:20 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
VapidP wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Shit Ya'll UT is in the wiki changing everything back to T14 as we speak!

Looks like they don't know how to update a map though....


What is this wiki?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_schoo ... ted_States


Hmm either it changed back, or I'm seeing a cached page because GT is still there.

User avatar
ood's_brother

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ood's_brother » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:30 pm

Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.

User avatar
KateMcKitten

Bronze
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby KateMcKitten » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:36 pm

appind wrote:is that you submitted 1/9 but didn't complete till Feb because they were waiting on some score or rec? many applied after that and went complete in jan. Wondering why apps go complete out of order.

Sorry for delayed response on this. Nope, all my LORs were submitted to LSAC in October and I took the December LSAT, so everything was clear on my end by 1/9. Maybe LSAC had a delay on sending some parts over? I have honestly no idea why some apps go complete very quickly and others take over a month.

CenterFringe

Bronze
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:30 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby CenterFringe » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:37 pm

Looks like T-13 is the new T-14? Judging from the wiki anyway.

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16642
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby Rigo » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:41 pm

ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.

Hahah please do

User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby Kinch08 » Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:20 pm

ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.


Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.

nonononono

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:46 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby nonononono » Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:39 pm

Kinch08 wrote:
ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.


Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.


Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand delivered

User avatar
hellohalo

Silver
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby hellohalo » Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:41 pm

CenterFringe wrote:Looks like T-13 is the new T-14? Judging from the wiki anyway.


+1 no T14 for 10? years

User avatar
ood's_brother

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ood's_brother » Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:50 pm

nonononono wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.


Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.


Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand delivered


My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/

User avatar
ashrice13

Gold
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ashrice13 » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:10 pm

ood's_brother wrote:
nonononono wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.


Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.


Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand delivered


My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/

Send a follow up arrangement? Make sure the card states "I believe me last arrangement went to the worker's lounge. This was not the intent. Please only deliver to adcomms."

User avatar
ood's_brother

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ood's_brother » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:13 pm

ashrice13 wrote:
ood's_brother wrote:
nonononono wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.


Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.


Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand delivered


My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/

Send a follow up arrangement? Make sure the card states "I believe me last arrangement went to the worker's lounge. This was not the intent. Please only deliver to adcomms."

I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.

User avatar
Future Ex-Engineer

Silver
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby Future Ex-Engineer » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:16 pm

ood's_brother wrote:
ashrice13 wrote:
ood's_brother wrote:
nonononono wrote:
Kinch08 wrote:
ood's_brother wrote:Should I email Harvard letting them know I'm in at a higher ranked school (S) and would appreciate an expedited decision from them?

They've rejected all my previous advances, but now I'm the hawt girl at the dance.


Yeah, let them know you got into Stanford and they'll create a special expedited JS2 wave just for you. Make sure you emphasize the fact that Stanford is now a "higher ranked school" in your e-mail. I would use those exact words, if I were you. Don't forget to include a downloadable virtual edible arrangement.


Please don't do this. A downloadable virtual edible arrangement is not the way to go. It has to be hand delivered


My mom. Already tried that. I'm guessing it just went to the workers lounge. :/

Send a follow up arrangement? Make sure the card states "I believe me last arrangement went to the worker's lounge. This was not the intent. Please only deliver to adcomms."

I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.


bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers gender

canafsa

Bronze
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby canafsa » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:17 pm

.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ood's_brother

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ood's_brother » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:19 pm

mrgstephe wrote:

bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers gender


Nah brah, it's MAGA times. Trump consolidated all genders and regulations. Only two ✌.

User avatar
ashrice13

Gold
Posts: 1792
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ashrice13 » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:22 pm

canafsa wrote:
mrgstephe wrote:
ood's_brother wrote: I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.


bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers gender


That's why I refer to everyone as "zher" until they tell me otherwise.

Replace the He/She pronoun with "It" I believe this is the most PC way to move forward with your card and fruit delivery.

User avatar
Future Ex-Engineer

Silver
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby Future Ex-Engineer » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:22 pm

ashrice13 wrote:
canafsa wrote:
mrgstephe wrote:
ood's_brother wrote: I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.


bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers gender


That's why I refer to everyone as "zher" until they tell me otherwise.

Replace the He/She pronoun with "It" I believe this is the most PC way to move forward with your card and fruit delivery.


I hope they include our hard hitting analysis on the next piece published that cites TLS

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1907
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby Pozzo » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:27 pm

ashrice13 wrote:
canafsa wrote:
mrgstephe wrote:
ood's_brother wrote: I can't remember my interviewer's name. I only remember her race, gender, and I can probably make a good guess at her weight. Should I include this? Would it come off the wrong way? I just want it to go where it needs to.


bro. it's 2017 you cant just assume your interviewers gender


That's why I refer to everyone as "zher" until they tell me otherwise.

Replace the He/She pronoun with "It" I believe this is the most PC way to move forward with your card and fruit delivery.

Nope - gotta go with the third person "they"

User avatar
ood's_brother

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ood's_brother » Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:34 pm

Will let y'all know if edible arrangements reaches out to me for sponsorship. I may not even have to throw my life away at law school.

alpinespring

New
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 2:59 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby alpinespring » Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:40 pm

.
Last edited by alpinespring on Wed Mar 08, 2017 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ood's_brother

Bronze
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby ood's_brother » Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:54 pm

alpinespring wrote:HLS should immediately fire its Admissions Director.

What a lousy job must she/he have done for the ranking to drop to #3


Not cool dude. They are great people. I assume you were being sarcastic. :cry:

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/02/27/i ... abilities/
(disclaimer: those people no longer work at HLS)

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16642
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby Rigo » Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:19 pm


User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Postby R. Jeeves » Tue Mar 07, 2017 9:05 pm

^ that happened in like 2013



Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot] and 5 guests