Page 9 of 29

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:01 pm
by dreamofNYC
The Dark Kite wrote:Just received a follow up email re: scholarship money! Woop. Comes in a neat little printable PDF as part of their efforts to go green. I can respect that. Again: good luck, y'all!
Congratulations!

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:27 pm
by pompoms
Received log-in info for the Accepted Students Site but still no scholarship offer. My guess is that means I am NOT getting one :|

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:27 pm
by gbelle
pompoms wrote:Received log-in info for the Accepted Students Site but still no scholarship offer. My guess is that means I am NOT getting one :|
I'm in the same situation... pretty disappointing
edit: that may sound bratty, but it's the only way I could justify it at this point....

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:39 pm
by kris4842
So my status date just changed, does that mean a decision will be coming soon?

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:08 pm
by JDByron31
kris4842 wrote:So my status date just changed, does that mean a decision will be coming soon?
Mine did too... hopefully?

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:08 pm
by kris4842
I hope...good luck

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:22 pm
by zienhal
https://twitter.com/KathrynForLaw (Fordham Law Director of Admissions)

Decisions coming out "later today"... LET'S DO THIS!

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:52 pm
by angels2fly
Is a date change a pre-req to a decision? I applied on 12/16 and went complete on 01/06 due to pending LSAT.

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:05 pm
by zienhal
I had an October LSAT score and went complete soon after I applied (12/2) but then my date changed by itself on 1/6. So I'm not sure what the date changes mean. Although, I do know the University of Maryland says on their application status checker page that date changes are for administrative purposes and that they don't affect application decisions.

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 10:08 pm
by rutgers17
zienhal wrote:https://twitter.com/KathrynForLaw (Fordham Law Director of Admissions)

Decisions coming out "later today"... LET'S DO THIS!
looks like she was trolling us... :evil:

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 10:24 am
by kris4842
I got my denial yesterday :evil:

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 10:27 am
by The Dark Kite
kris4842 wrote:I got my denial yesterday :evil:
Sorry to hear that, man. #'s? (you can PM)

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 11:12 am
by CJ Cregg
Checking in - want to go here so badly! Submitted my application on 12/28..

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:26 pm
by ArcticDeckie
Waitlisted with LSAT/GPA just barely below medians, even with unique WE. In for the long run, I guess.

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 10:09 pm
by The Dark Kite
ArcticDeckie wrote:Waitlisted with LSAT/GPA just barely below medians, even with unique WE. In for the long run, I guess.
Good luck man. WL is always better than a rejection IMO. Give it time, I think schools don't understand just how low apps/matriculation are gonna be this cycle...

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:11 am
by AJB
Did anyone solicit a fee waiver from Fordham?

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:39 am
by lawskewl13
The Dark Kite wrote:
ArcticDeckie wrote:Waitlisted with LSAT/GPA just barely below medians, even with unique WE. In for the long run, I guess.
Good luck man. WL is always better than a rejection IMO. Give it time, I think schools don't understand just how low apps/matriculation are gonna be this cycle...
Is it just me or does Fordham seem to be a little unrealistic in the applicants they've been admitting based on LSN? Looks like they've WLed almost everyone who has their target stats...

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:40 am
by bpc2110
In via email yesterday. 3.55/167

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:27 am
by ZipWhenSheMoves
lawskewl13 wrote:
The Dark Kite wrote:
ArcticDeckie wrote:Waitlisted with LSAT/GPA just barely below medians, even with unique WE. In for the long run, I guess.
Good luck man. WL is always better than a rejection IMO. Give it time, I think schools don't understand just how low apps/matriculation are gonna be this cycle...
Is it just me or does Fordham seem to be a little unrealistic in the applicants they've been admitting based on LSN? Looks like they've WLed almost everyone who has their target stats...
yea, I agree. They only seem to be admitting people in the high 160s...trying I guess to net all the NYU hopefuls who don't really have a shot (hi guys!) It seems pretty ridiculous to me...they're going to end up with an entering class that was almost entirely off of the waitlist I'll bet. Or a class of only 25 students.

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:27 am
by gbelle
ZipWhenSheMoves wrote:
lawskewl13 wrote:
The Dark Kite wrote:
ArcticDeckie wrote:Waitlisted with LSAT/GPA just barely below medians, even with unique WE. In for the long run, I guess.
Good luck man. WL is always better than a rejection IMO. Give it time, I think schools don't understand just how low apps/matriculation are gonna be this cycle...
Is it just me or does Fordham seem to be a little unrealistic in the applicants they've been admitting based on LSN? Looks like they've WLed almost everyone who has their target stats...
yea, I agree. They only seem to be admitting people in the high 160s...trying I guess to net all the NYU hopefuls who don't really have a shot (hi guys!) It seems pretty ridiculous to me...they're going to end up with an entering class that was almost entirely off of the waitlist I'll bet. Or a class of only 25 students.
I was admitted with a 162. Don't lose hope just yet.

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:40 am
by Ed2020
Waitlisted 1/8. Honestly very flattered: 158/3.6

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:43 am
by anyriotgirl
AJB wrote:Did anyone solicit a fee waiver from Fordham?
I tried-- they only do need based.

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:54 am
by The Dark Kite
gbelle wrote: I was admitted with a 162. Don't lose hope just yet.
+1
lawskewl13 wrote: Is it just me or does Fordham seem to be a little unrealistic in the applicants they've been admitting based on LSN? Looks like they've WLed almost everyone who has their target stats...
A lot of people are trying to be able to predict law school admissions and honestly: it's been impossible so far. I got in with a scholarship with target numbers, no WL, no nothing.. most of these schools are primarily concerned with yield... my application was very convincing as to why I would likely attend if accepted, and I think that definitely factored in.. along with a lot of strong softs and decent numbers.

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 3:09 pm
by MrsHello
anyriotgirl wrote:
AJB wrote:Did anyone solicit a fee waiver from Fordham?
I tried-- they only do need based.
I got a fee waiver after I emailed their admissions and asked for one. All the schools I applied to gave me a fee waiver (Northwestern/ St. John's/ Fordham) after emailing their Admissions Office. It NEVER hurts to ask. :wink:

Re: Fordham c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)

Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 3:15 pm
by krispymenudo
MrsHello wrote:
anyriotgirl wrote:
AJB wrote:Did anyone solicit a fee waiver from Fordham?
I tried-- they only do need based.
I got a fee waiver after I emailed their admissions and asked for one. All the schools I applied to gave me a fee waiver (Northwestern/ St. John's/ Fordham) after emailing their Admissions Office. It NEVER hurts to ask. :wink:

I solicited fee waivers from EVERY school I applied to minus Stanford and UCLA. I receive financial aid and am paying my UG tuition myself (but I'm sure if you are receiving financial aid at all this will work). I wrote out a letter saying I wanted to apply but was already denied to LSAC fee waiver and couldn't afford to pay more than $25 bucks for each school and attached my financial aid statement as a PDF. I got emailed back within the next 3 days by all of them. I don't think they're all that stingy with fee waivers, you just need to express an individual and genuine interest to them.