Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

How Many Date Changes Have You Had?

0
36
15%
1
41
17%
2
53
22%
3
62
26%
4
20
8%
5+
30
12%
 
Total votes: 242

User avatar
ScottRiqui
Posts: 3640
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby ScottRiqui » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:06 am

pompoms wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.


Good advice, but your username/avatar make it *really* hard to take your scolding seriously. :lol:

edwardt1988
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby edwardt1988 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:08 am

pompoms wrote:
edwardt1988 wrote:
superdingle2000 wrote:
gigibeirne wrote:just random but i think its fun so bring this up
my interviewer was like super pretty so i google her up and found a clip about her introducing her firm to summer interns or sth..like broadcasting clip
the short clip heavily concentrated on her lips.......
so TLSer who underestimated GULC or mentioned Georgetttown,fuck youuuu all cuz GULC got beautiful blondies with decent medical background. lol



pics or it didnt happen





Just do it. You can't mention a IRL pretty girl on the interwebz and not post pictures. That's breaking the rules.




For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.


Not sure if you are working with her or not, but I'd hope you realize that that I was kidding, and nobody expects him to actually post a picture of her. Nor do I think that him calling her pretty is objectifying, but I can understand why it can be perceived like that

User avatar
pompoms
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:55 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby pompoms » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:23 am

ScottRiqui wrote:
pompoms wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.


Good advice, but your username/avatar make it *really* hard to take your scolding seriously. :lol:


I pity the fool who doesn't take Rachel Zane seriously.

NoDayButToday
Posts: 1031
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby NoDayButToday » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:25 am

.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

04102014
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby 04102014 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:33 am

What an exciting turn of events itt today.

NoDayButToday
Posts: 1031
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby NoDayButToday » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:37 am

.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

edwardt1988
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby edwardt1988 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:39 am

NoDayButToday wrote:I'm sorry to be ignorant, but what is "ITT?" I've seen this a lot.

In this thread

NoDayButToday
Posts: 1031
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby NoDayButToday » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:40 am

.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kidrobotLaw
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 9:28 am

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby kidrobotLaw » Tue Dec 10, 2013 3:56 pm

Anybody receive a letter today?

mec246
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:35 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby mec246 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:05 pm

kidrobotLaw wrote:Anybody receive a letter today?


I received an email. ED application being "deferred" until they have a "better sense of the overall applicant pool." They promise a final decision before Feb. 28.

Anyone else?

User avatar
Nucky
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:26 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Nucky » Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:32 pm

mec246 wrote:
kidrobotLaw wrote:Anybody receive a letter today?


I received an email. ED application being "deferred" until they have a "better sense of the overall applicant pool." They promise a final decision before Feb. 28.

Anyone else?



Not a peep here. Application has only been complete for a little over a week though.

snapdragon25
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:43 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby snapdragon25 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:42 pm

ScottRiqui wrote:
pompoms wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.


Good advice, but your username/avatar make it *really* hard to take your scolding seriously. :lol:


Seriously not looking forward to going to law school with these sexist douches who can't take women seriously because omg tits and hair and biology!11111

SparkyZZZ
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 12:55 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby SparkyZZZ » Tue Dec 10, 2013 5:57 pm

Mec246, check out this thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=199259

It should answer your questions. To briefly sum it up, being "held" is better than going straight to the wait list.

User avatar
ZipWhenSheMoves
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:46 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby ZipWhenSheMoves » Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:27 pm

snapdragon25 wrote:
ScottRiqui wrote:
pompoms wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.


Good advice, but your username/avatar make it *really* hard to take your scolding seriously. :lol:


Seriously not looking forward to going to law school with these sexist douches who can't take women seriously because omg tits and hair and biology!11111



Poms and Snap- thank you so much for saying this. Just added you both as friends on my profile (huge honor, I know :p)

But seriously, get it together people.

mec246
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 2:35 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby mec246 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:58 pm

SparkyZZZ wrote:Mec246, check out this thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=199259

It should answer your questions. To briefly sum it up, being "held" is better than going straight to the wait list.



Thank you! Very helpful.

cyoo
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:22 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby cyoo » Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:43 pm

Is 3 status updates with no interview request a good sign? I know that a few people got admitted after 3 updates and no interview, but was wondering if it's okay for me to expect something good...My last update was 12/9 by the way. thanks!

User avatar
Leo
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:58 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Leo » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:47 pm

Checking in.

User avatar
bloomingtea
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby bloomingtea » Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:54 am

,
Last edited by bloomingtea on Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Yea All Right
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Yea All Right » Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:56 am

Checking in, good luck to everyone applying!

LSAT: 168
GPA: 3.64

User avatar
gigibeirne
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:58 am

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby gigibeirne » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:49 am

-
Last edited by gigibeirne on Wed Dec 11, 2013 6:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gigibeirne
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:58 am

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby gigibeirne » Wed Dec 11, 2013 5:30 am

snapdragon25 wrote:
ScottRiqui wrote:
pompoms wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.


Good advice, but your username/avatar make it *really* hard to take your scolding seriously. :lol:


Seriously not looking forward to going to law school with these sexist douches who can't take women seriously because omg tits and hair and biology!11111



snap:its so funny how you distort original statement to fit in your archetypically imaginary villain sexiest image,who said 'tits or biology or hair' for fux sake..not sure if this is how you see women.
nice judgment and your high moral standpoint is sensationally cool.

EDIT: im totally okay with people pointing out the inappropriateness embodied in my snetence because its possible that people have different reaction and potentially will get offended,well im more than willing to admit my improprieties and apologize if it is.
but pointing outright' sexist douche' is absolutely hilarious and honestly yur level of ignorance is almost so cute that i can use it as a textbook mistake of modern phonies trying to establish their moral nobility by distinguishing themselves from other 'sexist douche' people using the engrained sexiest image already existed in their heads. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism
Last edited by gigibeirne on Wed Dec 11, 2013 6:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Wed Dec 11, 2013 5:57 am

gigibeirne wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.



[[[i can't even...]]]


it's really not a good idea to drunkpost in acceptance threads.
Last edited by Kimikho on Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

04102014
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby 04102014 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:57 am

What's going on here?

User avatar
andapieceoftoast
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby andapieceoftoast » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:02 am

scoobers wrote:
gigibeirne wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.



well im confused, would you be so kind to enlighten me that which part of my word indicate objectification of women.
since when spontaneous appreciation on women's appearances become objectifying women, like every single time i compliment some other fellow women sincerely, it will turn out to be some egregious discrimination against women.
just for random question...im wondering why would women be offended by seemingly friendly appreciation of their beautiness. is there a way women as a group or an individual be demeaned by it?because by objectification i guess it implies wrongful discrimination or demeaning its equal moral value as others or something.
but again, im by no means looking for a fight,just so confused miss, :oops: and i hate idiots who asking for pics,,could be just another random"ahh stunning" post


it's really not a good idea to drunkpost in acceptance threads.


^^ Haha this!

edwardt1988
Posts: 365
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm

Re: Georgetown c/o 2017 Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby edwardt1988 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:10 am

ohpobrecito wrote:What's going on here?

Some people have just become acquainted with the Internet I think




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Assasindowntheavenue, finaciardi, glockov, hoy456, itshandled, jjcorvino, malysh, mcvizz, metaxerox88, proteinshake, smartmoon and 25 guests