snapdragon25 wrote: ScottRiqui wrote:
For the record, I work with her, your alumni interviewer. I suggest avoiding using your real name in the forums. This is not an appropriate line of discussion and objectifying a female attorney in a public forum is probably not anyone's best use of this thread...if you get me.
Good advice, but your username/avatar make it *really* hard to take your scolding seriously.
Seriously not looking forward to going to law school with these sexist douches who can't take women seriously because omg tits and hair and biology!11111
snap:its so funny how you distort original statement to fit in your archetypically imaginary villain sexiest image,who said 'tits
or biology or hair' for fux sake..not sure if this is how you see women.
nice judgment and your high moral standpoint is sensationally cool.
EDIT: im totally okay with people pointing out the inappropriateness embodied in my snetence because its possible that people have different reaction and potentially will get offended,well im more than willing to admit my improprieties and apologize if it is.
but pointing outright' sexist douche' is absolutely hilarious and honestly yur level of ignorance is almost so cute that i can use it as a textbook mistake of modern phonies trying to establish their moral nobility by distinguishing themselves from other 'sexist douche' people using the engrained sexiest image already existed in their heads. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism