Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
koalacity

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by koalacity » Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:42 pm

rutgers17 wrote:
caiti wrote:
koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0

Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
I submitted early Dec and just got an interview request, so I don't think that timeline will apply this year.
+1
Phew, this is a relief. Would the two of you mind sharing your complete dates (here or PM)?

User avatar
rutgers17

Bronze
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:43 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by rutgers17 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:44 pm

koalacity wrote:
rutgers17 wrote:
caiti wrote:
koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0

Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
I submitted early Dec and just got an interview request, so I don't think that timeline will apply this year.
+1
Phew, this is a relief. Would the two of you mind sharing your complete dates (here or PM)?
Complete 12/2 I believe and then 1/9 or so -- I cant quite remember but somewhere around that.

tls2175

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by tls2175 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:05 pm

Received an interview request last week 1/8 (interview later this week)

Submitted 11/2
Complete 11/5
UR1 11/27
UR2 (Invited for Interview) 1/8

Edit: Splitter - LSAT>75%/GPA<25%

User avatar
caiti

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:46 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by caiti » Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:02 pm

koalacity wrote:
rutgers17 wrote:
caiti wrote:
koalacity wrote:Found this other interview spreadsheet from last cycle that seems to have quite a few more entries than the other one: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... wdWc#gid=0

Also, that spreadsheet makes it look like December submits didn't get interview invites UNTIL MARCH :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
I submitted early Dec and just got an interview request, so I don't think that timeline will apply this year.
+1
Phew, this is a relief. Would the two of you mind sharing your complete dates (here or PM)?
Complete Dec 10 according to the email. (submitted 12/1.) I haven't been obsessively checking the status so I don't know when any UR dates were.

User avatar
HarvardHopeful

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:55 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by HarvardHopeful » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:00 pm

From the looks of LSN, most people who applied in September or October found out 1/23/13. I believe the year before that decisions went out earlier. What are everyone's predictions for this year's first big batch :?: :?:

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Blackjack45

New
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Blackjack45 » Wed Jan 15, 2014 9:03 pm

HarvardHopeful wrote:From the looks of LSN, most people who applied in September or October found out 1/23/13. I believe the year before that decisions went out earlier. What are everyone's predictions for this year's first big batch :?: :?:
I think the year before that (2012) was before they had this big of an interview process. So if last year (2013, the first year with the interview process) is any indicator of this year, I suspect next weekend (1/25/14) or later.

tls2175

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:09 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by tls2175 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:37 am

How personal am I supposed to get for the "if you could go back in time and change one thing" question during the interview? Is it enough to say I wish I had taken Chinese instead of French in high school or do I have to say something like, I wish I hadn't killed that man accidentally? (both examples are not real, of course)

Theopliske8711

Gold
Posts: 2213
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:21 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Theopliske8711 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:42 am

On Application Complete since 12/23/13. Ugh, this is getting irritating.

AGrafton

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by AGrafton » Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:44 am

tls2175 wrote:How personal am I supposed to get for the "if you could go back in time and change one thing" question during the interview? Is it enough to say I wish I had taken Chinese instead of French in high school or do I have to say something like, I wish I hadn't killed that man accidentally? (both examples are not real, of course)
This. My first thought when they asked was: plenty of things we're definitely not going to bring up during this conversation... I ended up going with something relating to my academic history, and didn't get into anything personal.

(also, the question was asked as "If you could name your biggest regret, what would it be?" during my interview).

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
lastsamurai

Silver
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by lastsamurai » Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:51 am

Mine was something like "if you could re-do one thing" so I went with a really great experience that I had and basically said that I would make it even better (with some specific things I would have changed) knowing what I know now. I think it's really important to stay positive in a question like this fwiw

User avatar
Balthy

Silver
Posts: 665
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Balthy » Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:55 am

lastsamurai wrote:Mine was something like "if you could re-do one thing" so I went with a really great experience that I had and basically said that I would make it even better (with some specific things I would have changed) knowing what I know now. I think it's really important to stay positive in a question like this fwiw
I couldn't have thought of such a positive framework for that answer. Thanks!

User avatar
midwest17

Gold
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by midwest17 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:43 pm

Balthy wrote:
lastsamurai wrote:Mine was something like "if you could re-do one thing" so I went with a really great experience that I had and basically said that I would make it even better (with some specific things I would have changed) knowing what I know now. I think it's really important to stay positive in a question like this fwiw
I couldn't have thought of such a positive framework for that answer. Thanks!
Doesn't really work if they ask the "regret" question though.

User avatar
chneyo

Bronze
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by chneyo » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:47 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Tue Feb 11, 2014 11:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
lawschool22

Gold
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:53 pm

chneyo wrote:
lastsamurai wrote:Mine was something like "if you could re-do one thing" so I went with a really great experience that I had and basically said that I would make it even better (with some specific things I would have changed) knowing what I know now. I think it's really important to stay positive in a question like this fwiw
I'll say I wish I would've chosen a different TLS user name. Something clever that could have had a photo to go along with it. Like "Long Kneck of the Law" and then a photo of a giraffe holding a gavel or something. #lifesgreatregrets
Image
I am with you there. I chose this one to be ambiguous and somewhat anonymous and nondescript, but now I wish I had been way more creative.

User avatar
China Spy

Bronze
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by China Spy » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:57 pm

Checking in.

Slightly below 25th LSAT. Median GPA. Urm.

Hit submit yesterday. How late am I to the party?

User avatar
midwest17

Gold
Posts: 1685
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by midwest17 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:59 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
chneyo wrote:
lastsamurai wrote:Mine was something like "if you could re-do one thing" so I went with a really great experience that I had and basically said that I would make it even better (with some specific things I would have changed) knowing what I know now. I think it's really important to stay positive in a question like this fwiw
I'll say I wish I would've chosen a different TLS user name. Something clever that could have had a photo to go along with it. Like "Long Kneck of the Law" and then a photo of a giraffe holding a gavel or something. #lifesgreatregrets
Image
I am with you there. I chose this one to be ambiguous and somewhat anonymous and nondescript, but now I wish I had been way more creative.
I'm terrible at picking user names, especially because I wanted something completely unconnected to the rest of my online presence.

Kimikho

Gold
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Kimikho » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:00 pm

midwest17 wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
chneyo wrote:
lastsamurai wrote:Mine was something like "if you could re-do one thing" so I went with a really great experience that I had and basically said that I would make it even better (with some specific things I would have changed) knowing what I know now. I think it's really important to stay positive in a question like this fwiw
I'll say I wish I would've chosen a different TLS user name. Something clever that could have had a photo to go along with it. Like "Long Kneck of the Law" and then a photo of a giraffe holding a gavel or something. #lifesgreatregrets
Image
I am with you there. I chose this one to be ambiguous and somewhat anonymous and nondescript, but now I wish I had been way more creative.
I'm terrible at picking user names, especially because I wanted something completely unconnected to the rest of my online presence.
my username is literally the first word that popped in my head when creating the account.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
lastsamurai

Silver
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by lastsamurai » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:01 pm

midwest17 wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
chneyo wrote:
I'll say I wish I would've chosen a different TLS user name. Something clever that could have had a photo to go along with it. Like "Long Kneck of the Law" and then a photo of a giraffe holding a gavel or something. #lifesgreatregrets
Image
I am with you there. I chose this one to be ambiguous and somewhat anonymous and nondescript, but now I wish I had been way more creative.
I'm terrible at picking user names, especially because I wanted something completely unconnected to the rest of my online presence.
Completely agree...I wanted something nondescript and had just talked to a friend about the movie the last samurai. :oops:

User avatar
chneyo

Bronze
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by chneyo » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:03 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ricky-Bobby

Silver
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Ricky-Bobby » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:09 pm

lastsamurai wrote:
midwest17 wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
chneyo wrote:
I'll say I wish I would've chosen a different TLS user name. Something clever that could have had a photo to go along with it. Like "Long Kneck of the Law" and then a photo of a giraffe holding a gavel or something. #lifesgreatregrets
I am with you there. I chose this one to be ambiguous and somewhat anonymous and nondescript, but now I wish I had been way more creative.
I'm terrible at picking user names, especially because I wanted something completely unconnected to the rest of my online presence.
Completely agree...I wanted something nondescript and had just talked to a friend about the movie the last samurai. :oops:
I was watching Talladega Nights when I signed up. Figured I'd add the avatar to complete the package.

User avatar
chneyo

Bronze
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by chneyo » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:12 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:53 am, edited 2 times in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Instinctive

Bronze
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Instinctive » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:20 pm

Where is the Chicago interview guide again? I'm totally blanking :paperbagonhead:

User avatar
Ricky-Bobby

Silver
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by Ricky-Bobby » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:20 pm

Why is the UChi admissions twitter account talking about lunch with David Axelrod? Less lunch, more application review.

User avatar
wsparker

Bronze
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by wsparker » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:25 pm

Ricky-Bobby wrote:Why is the UChi admissions twitter account talking about lunch with David Axelrod? Less lunch, more application review.
+1

User avatar
esrom55

Bronze
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:43 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Post by esrom55 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 2:42 pm

Ricky-Bobby wrote:Why is the UChi admissions twitter account talking about lunch with David Axelrod? Less lunch, more application review.
How can you be so sure David Axelrod is not doing one of the admission interviews?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”