- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:57 pm
That being said, I can offer two data points gleaned from the '17 thread:
- No (myself)
- Yes (clouded.memory)
As to your other question, no Top 10 (or T-14 for that matter) has this "requirement".
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:55 am
Unless your recommender has specific and personal knowledge of SLS and can credibly argue why you and SLS are a particularly good match, a targeted letter isn't going to do anything. If the letter will just include boilerplate restatements of crap from the SLS website or, worse, just substitute "Stanford Law School" for "law school" in the non-targeted LOR, don't bother.
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
ti malice's comments seem spot-on.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 07marie05, 20171lhopeful, 206488476, _split, A_Faus95, aalvez, adozendoughnuts, AJ1010, AllHailKingMao, Anon.y.mousse., ashrice13, Assasindowntheavenue, aw_1234, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], blahblah123, blelwoods, Blue664, celticsfan, chichi1992, CPA-->JD, curry1, dasq5511, dddddd90, dietcoke1, Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash, drjekyllope, gizmo1024, Google Adsense [Bot], HennessyVSOP, heyitslj, hoyasaxa13, hydrohect, Instrumental, intlbr, JC2017, jessmeesh, jprath2, jurisdoctor2020, JustWannaGraduate, kamy123, KeeshyCarey0909, Keilz, kokno, Kopetz, kvnrogers, laqueredup, lawlzschool, lawschool2016nyc, LawTweet, LegalAAA, Legallylawyer2020, lilikoillama, longsh0305, ls_2020, meghanmarkle, mintchocolatechip, MSNbot Media, mtf612, myrik, nickles96, nimbus cloud, nonononono, NotAGolfer, PinqueHat, potterotter, proteinshake, pz37, resipsaloq2, Sarastro, scoot456, sittykitty, Smc1994, Smeag91, sonyco, Studybuddy17, Tazewell, thehours, TheManinBlack051, tripleS, unrelated, utnyc44, Watababe, Yahoo [Bot], yhchoi1687 and 161 guests