Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:24 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Today is my 10th day on PT (went complete morning of the 7th), I'm super excited but have a feeling I'll wind up on the WL.
-
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:24 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yeah so I got put on Priority Reserve (3.4 173). Now I'm nervous about the rest of this cycle, I just want to get in somewhere in the T14
- samoby
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 12:44 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I know the feeling. :/Rangers5 wrote:Yeah so I got put on Priority Reserve (3.4 173). Now I'm nervous about the rest of this cycle, I just want to get in somewhere in the T14
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
/
Last edited by christobel on Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I missed the spreadsheet, just found it on an earlier page and adding my approx stats nowlawschool22 wrote:I have no idea how many people do overall, but your post inspired me to add some PT analytics to the Duke spreadsheet. Let me know if you guys think of any others.wtrc wrote:Do we at all know how many people get PT per cycle?
OP: Can you add the spreadsheet to the main post?
Also, the analytics are great- if you wanted to add them to the HLS spreadsheet I created if it's possible to do so without any real work on your end other than like copying and pasting would be awesome (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... mQWc#gid=0)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
When I get to a computer I'll take a look. It may be simple, but depends on how uniform the data people have entered is. I was going to do an HLS one, but since you have one already it may be better to add them to that.wtrc wrote:I missed the spreadsheet, just found it on an earlier page and adding my approx stats nowlawschool22 wrote:I have no idea how many people do overall, but your post inspired me to add some PT analytics to the Duke spreadsheet. Let me know if you guys think of any others.wtrc wrote:Do we at all know how many people get PT per cycle?
OP: Can you add the spreadsheet to the main post?
Also, the analytics are great- if you wanted to add them to the HLS spreadsheet I created if it's possible to do so without any real work on your end other than like copying and pasting would be awesome (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... mQWc#gid=0)
Also if you check the admissions forum there is a main thread I started with links to all of the spreadsheets I've created thus far.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 7:25 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
.
Last edited by ogardenn on Tue May 05, 2015 11:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
ogardenn wrote:Just got put on PT Reserve
174 / 3.6 (took LSAT 5 times; 165->174)
Wrote a short Why Duke
Very strong LoRs (including one from t6 law professor)
Above average soft
Hope this is not a general indicator of this cycle for me...
I'm confused. Do you guys think I'm YP'd? Many with higher numbers have gotten in and I even wrote Why Duke...
legit worried now.
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Got my LORs in and emailed a Why Duke.
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yes, you are totally YP'ed here. Don't worry. If you really want Duke and let them know through a LOCI, you'll get in. What is your top choice?ogardenn wrote:Just got put on PT Reserve
174 / 3.6 (took LSAT 5 times; 165->174)
Wrote a short Why Duke
Very strong LoRs (including one from t6 law professor)
Above average soft
Hope this is not a general indicator of this cycle for me...
I'm confused. Do you guys think I'm YP'd? Many with higher numbers have gotten in and I even wrote Why Duke...
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
wtrc wrote:Yes, you are totally YP'ed here. Don't worry. If you really want Duke and let them know through a LOCI, you'll get in. What is your top choice?ogardenn wrote:Just got put on PT Reserve
174 / 3.6 (took LSAT 5 times; 165->174)
Wrote a short Why Duke
Very strong LoRs (including one from t6 law professor)
Above average soft
Hope this is not a general indicator of this cycle for me...
I'm confused. Do you guys think I'm YP'd? Many with higher numbers have gotten in and I even wrote Why Duke...
Well I am interested in Duke and I got Priority reserve with 177, 3.6 on Thursday. Send them a LOCI that same day, so if they are really YP, we should find out soon(obv not conclusive cuz maybe they YP him, and they just don't like him, but still)
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Just curious- did you also have multiple retakes?edwardt1988 wrote:wtrc wrote:Yes, you are totally YP'ed here. Don't worry. If you really want Duke and let them know through a LOCI, you'll get in. What is your top choice?ogardenn wrote:Just got put on PT Reserve
174 / 3.6 (took LSAT 5 times; 165->174)
Wrote a short Why Duke
Very strong LoRs (including one from t6 law professor)
Above average soft
Hope this is not a general indicator of this cycle for me...
I'm confused. Do you guys think I'm YP'd? Many with higher numbers have gotten in and I even wrote Why Duke...
Well I am interested in Duke and I got Priority reserve with 177, 3.6 on Thursday. Send them a LOCI that same day, so if they are really YP, we should find out soon(obv not conclusive cuz maybe they YP him, and they just don't like him, but still)
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yeswtrc wrote:Just curious- did you also have multiple retakes?edwardt1988 wrote:wtrc wrote:Yes, you are totally YP'ed here. Don't worry. If you really want Duke and let them know through a LOCI, you'll get in. What is your top choice?ogardenn wrote:Just got put on PT Reserve
174 / 3.6 (took LSAT 5 times; 165->174)
Wrote a short Why Duke
Very strong LoRs (including one from t6 law professor)
Above average soft
Hope this is not a general indicator of this cycle for me...
I'm confused. Do you guys think I'm YP'd? Many with higher numbers have gotten in and I even wrote Why Duke...
Well I am interested in Duke and I got Priority reserve with 177, 3.6 on Thursday. Send them a LOCI that same day, so if they are really YP, we should find out soon(obv not conclusive cuz maybe they YP him, and they just don't like him, but still)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
So Duke is literally the only school that I know of that explicitly says in the instructions that they average multiple LSAT scores unless there is an addendum telling them why not to do so.
Did y'all write an addendum? It seems like the people getting putting on P.R. with high numbers all had multiple takes here? I am still in my 10 day period, but I also have multiple takes...
Did y'all write an addendum? It seems like the people getting putting on P.R. with high numbers all had multiple takes here? I am still in my 10 day period, but I also have multiple takes...
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
wtrc wrote:So Duke is literally the only school that I know of that explicitly says in the instructions that they average multiple LSAT scores unless there is an addendum telling them why not to do so.
Did y'all write an addendum? It seems like the people getting putting on P.R. with high numbers all had multiple takes here? I am still in my 10 day period, but I also have multiple takes...
That's a good point, but I think that if they average my LSAT scores it's still higher than their median.
But obv they could have different reasons for putting us on their PR, who knows.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 7:25 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
.edwardt1988 wrote:wtrc wrote:So Duke is literally the only school that I know of that explicitly says in the instructions that they average multiple LSAT scores unless there is an addendum telling them why not to do so.
Did y'all write an addendum? It seems like the people getting putting on P.R. with high numbers all had multiple takes here? I am still in my 10 day period, but I also have multiple takes...
That's a good point, but I think that if they average my LSAT scores it's still higher than their median.
But obv they could have different reasons for putting us on their PR, who knows.
Last edited by ogardenn on Tue May 05, 2015 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Ha, thanks. I'll stay away from predicting anything about my acceptances until I get one acceptance, lologardenn wrote:edwardt1988 wrote:wtrc wrote:So Duke is literally the only school that I know of that explicitly says in the instructions that they average multiple LSAT scores unless there is an addendum telling them why not to do so.
Did y'all write an addendum? It seems like the people getting putting on P.R. with high numbers all had multiple takes here? I am still in my 10 day period, but I also have multiple takes...
That's a good point, but I think that if they average my LSAT scores it's still higher than their median.
But obv they could have different reasons for putting us on their PR, who knows.
Didn't write an addendum -- didn't know they explicitly say they average scores.
My average score will be at their median.
edwardt1988, you know you will get into t6. Take me with you
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
From the app instructions:
Duke considers all LSAT scores that are submitted, in the context of the entire application (transcripts, personal statement, letters of recommendation, evidence of leadership and engagement, and other information). In the case of multiple test scores, data show that the average score is generally the most useful in predicting law school performance; however, Duke may place greater weight on a high score if the applicant provides compelling information about why that score is a better indication of his or her potential. If you feel that one or more of your test scores does not accurately reflect your ability or potential, please use the Miscellaneous Addendum attachment to explain this disparity.
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
That's very possible, the 3.6 is at the 25th percentile (3.59) essentially, just the LSAT is way over their 75th (170).slackademic wrote:What makes you guys think 3.6/174 is YP territory for Duke? I don't really think it is. If you are sincerely interested in them, you are definitely still in the hunt.
I haven't heard from them yet, on like day 5 of the 10 days now, so TBD soon
-
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
lol it isn't a yield protect. This is a splitterwtrc wrote:That's very possible, the 3.6 is at the 25th percentile (3.59) essentially, just the LSAT is way over their 75th (170).slackademic wrote:What makes you guys think 3.6/174 is YP territory for Duke? I don't really think it is. If you are sincerely interested in them, you are definitely still in the hunt.
I haven't heard from them yet, on like day 5 of the 10 days now, so TBD soon
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:38 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Scared now. Thanks gang.
I applied 11/15.
LSAT: 162 > 173
GPA: 4.0
Wrote a "Why Duke"
Wrote an addendum for the LSAT score
Any idea as to what I can expect? You guys seem to know much more about trends than I do.
I applied 11/15.
LSAT: 162 > 173
GPA: 4.0
Wrote a "Why Duke"
Wrote an addendum for the LSAT score
Any idea as to what I can expect? You guys seem to know much more about trends than I do.
- emmybee
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 7:03 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I'm not an expert, but I doubt Duke puts averaging into practice. Just anecdotally: I did not have an addendum and my 3 LSAT scores average to 167 but I got in. I think my fellow re-takers shouldn't worry so muchwtrc wrote:So Duke is literally the only school that I know of that explicitly says in the instructions that they average multiple LSAT scores unless there is an addendum telling them why not to do so.
Did y'all write an addendum? It seems like the people getting putting on P.R. with high numbers all had multiple takes here? I am still in my 10 day period, but I also have multiple takes...
- Pishee77
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:14 am
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Just submitted.
Wrote a short "why Duke"
PT. Going to be a long 10 days.
Wrote a short "why Duke"
PT. Going to be a long 10 days.
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Duke c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Went complete today under PT. An email for Duke said the Thanksgiving Holiday will not count as one of the ten days, so I won't get a decision until early December.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login