Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Where are you in the Harvard application process?

I'm applying next year, just reading this thread to prepare
38
12%
Applying this year, I got an extension on my application
1
0%
I applied and haven't gotten a JS1 yet
64
20%
I applied and got a JS1, but haven't had it yet.
7
2%
I had my JS1 but I'm waiting for a magical phone call
43
13%
Already had my JS2, just here to help
62
19%
Waitlisted
61
19%
Dinged D:
49
15%
 
Total votes: 325

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:16 pm

Gary wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:Post 1600:

JSW FTW


lol i thought this meant you were waitlisted and i had a panic attack...


Well I probably will get waitlisted, I just hope when I do I can announce it using the superior acronym. :)

User avatar
neprep
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby neprep » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:17 pm

The-Specs wrote:
neprep wrote:
abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw


Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.


Vitriol?? Nep, I thought we were making such progress! :D


Image

I was team JSW all along, but deliberately made poor arguments in favor of JSjk that were meant to be at once ironic to those that got them and convincing those who didn't to go with its rival.

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:17 pm

neprep wrote:
The-Specs wrote:
neprep wrote:
abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw


Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.


Vitriol?? Nep, I thought we were making such progress! :D


Image

I was team JSW all along, but deliberately made poor arguments in favor of JSjk that were meant to be at once ironic to those that got them and convincing those who didn't to go with its rival.


Fooled me :)

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby koalacity » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:18 pm

neprep wrote:lucillewink.gif

I was team JSW all along, but deliberately made poor arguments in favor of JSjk that were meant to be at once ironic to those that got them and convincing those that didn't to go with its rival.

THE PLOT THICKENS

User avatar
neprep
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby neprep » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:19 pm

I mean come on, I was literally making APPEALS TO EMOTION. That only works on Boston Legal.

User avatar
chneyo
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby chneyo » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:20 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The-Specs
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby The-Specs » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:20 pm

I feel like I am watching a twisted version of this last presidential election with Romney winning the Republican Primary but then getting CRUSHED by Obama in the general election.

The only problem here is that JSW is Obama this time around but would have been a combination of Gingrich and Santorum in the previous round…i guess every analogy breaks down eventually.

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:21 pm

Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:22 pm

scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


:cry: :cry:

User avatar
The-Specs
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby The-Specs » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:22 pm

neprep wrote:I mean come on, I was literally making APPEALS TO EMOTION. That only works on Boston Legal.


LOL

But this is the Harvard thread so maybe you can see why I would think that what works in Boston Legal would seem to work here.

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:23 pm

We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby koalacity » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:24 pm

lawschool22 wrote:We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.

Egregious anti-Stanford trolling.

User avatar
andapieceoftoast
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby andapieceoftoast » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:24 pm

scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


Phew --- FRIENDS 8)

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:24 pm

lawschool22 wrote:We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.


Taffy got a Stanford letter to fill out her hys sweep

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:25 pm

koalacity wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.

Egregious anti-Stanford trolling.


I didn't apply because GPA. So I have no idea what's going on over there lol.

User avatar
05062014
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby 05062014 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:25 pm

scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


Does this not sound like a mean girl ? I rest my case

User avatar
The-Specs
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby The-Specs » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:26 pm

andapieceoftoast wrote:
scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


Phew --- FRIENDS 8)


Logic fail pieceoftoast, all we can know for certainty is that if you do NOT like JSJK that you canNOT befriends. We can't be certain that you will be friends with Scoobs just because you like JSJK. hth

I love you though!

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:26 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


:cry: :cry:


You still stand a chance of being scoobsjk'd ;)

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:27 pm

The-Specs wrote:
andapieceoftoast wrote:
scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


Phew --- FRIENDS 8)


Logic fail pieceoftoast, all we can know for certainty is that if you do NOT like JSJK that you canNOT befriends. We can't be certain that you will be friends with Scoobs just because you like JSJK. hth

I love you though!


Logic fail anyone who likes toast is my friend

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:28 pm

scoobers wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


:cry: :cry:


You still stand a chance of being scoobsjk'd ;)


I don't know what that is but I like it :lol:

User avatar
neprep
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby neprep » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:29 pm

abdistotle wrote:
scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


Does this not sound like a mean girl ? I rest my case


Perhaps, but not a mean girl from Mean Girls. Regina George doesn't make her criteria for selecting friends and foes (a) public and (b) easy.

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:30 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
scoobers wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend :evil:


:cry: :cry:


You still stand a chance of being scoobsjk'd ;)


I don't know what that is but I like it :lol:


I thought about making it something like "I'll just pretend to be your friend but not really" a la mean girls but let's be real that's not really my thing.

I think it is more "lol jk you are all my friends ilu all"

User avatar
Gary
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Gary » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:31 pm

ughhhhlafdkjasldfk;jsadasdfskajdfksjaklf

sorry i have to express my feelings about the lack of movement somewhere

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:32 pm

A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.

So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:33 pm

lawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.

So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.


We are so friends again




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 20171lhopeful, elcamino4, Exabot [Bot], kdonohue, Long shot hero, LtotheB, Pomegranate27, SNightHighlights, spursforever and 17 guests