Page 200 of 464

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:29 pm
by barrelofmonkeys
SteelPenguin wrote:At least Harvard was pretty fast with their rejection. Now I can go back to hating MA. GPA and LSAT both ~25%
using my 1999 to say :(

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:30 pm
by koalacity
SteelPenguin wrote:At least Harvard was pretty fast with their rejection. Now I can go back to hating MA. GPA and LSAT both ~25%
Sorry, SP :(.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:30 pm
by scoobysnax
Just got my JSNo a few minutes ago. Wish I had ED'd Columbia now :/

Submitted November, no JS1, 172/3.6X

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:31 pm
by lawschool22
scoobysnax wrote:Just got my JSNo a few minutes ago. Wish I had ED'd Columbia now :/

Submitted November, no JS1, 172/3.6X
:( Sorry to hear.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:31 pm
by Gary
phillywc wrote:
scoobers wrote:
drawstring wrote:Ya, so, I think I'm going to be staring at my inbox all day.
I've been scared to check my email ever since philly got WL from UVA :/
Yeah that changed my view on the cycle :/
I don't think you have to worry Philly. UVA doesn't really have a need for lsats over a 171, I think you'll be solid for CC :)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:31 pm
by midwest17
lawschool22 wrote:I wish they would just decide who was getting dings first, then send out a mass email wave. The slow drip of dings is just salt in the wound.
JS's way of expressing her hatred of TLS (because honestly, this doesn't impact anyone but us.)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:32 pm
by Nonconsecutive
SteelPenguin wrote:At least Harvard was pretty fast with their rejection. Now I can go back to hating MA. GPA and LSAT both ~25%
Sorry to hear :(

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:37 pm
by lawschool22
Obligatory:

I am very sorry about the dings, but before you go, please update your status in the spreadsheet. This will help current waiters and future generations of TLSers. It is greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:43 pm
by SparkyZZZ
Ding!

Totally knew it was coming...my only shot was a clerical error....

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:45 pm
by pompoms
Dinged as well

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:46 pm
by edwardt1988
pompoms wrote:Dinged as well
Sorry to hear that

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:51 pm
by wtrc
:( :(

Everyone dinged today is going to have quite amazing options anyway (and many already do).

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:56 pm
by pcthenls
ding dong my Harvard app is dead. I had no chance, but I am sorry to hear about some of you who got the email who have amazing numbers. You all will end up at amazing schools.

Good luck to those still waiting!

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:06 pm
by pompoms
edwardt1988 wrote:
pompoms wrote:Dinged as well
Sorry to hear that
Thanks! I was below both 25ths, but live in the area and had to give it a try.

Good luck everyone!

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:11 pm
by jlk411
lawschool22 wrote:
edwardt1988 wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Tariffs 172/3.46 apparently URM and got rejected :shock: :shock:
Yikes
+1

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:12 pm
by bayareabruin
.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:12 pm
by The-Specs
Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:14 pm
by wtrc
The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.

Sort of inclined to exercise dictatorial powers and do a runoff between the top two candidates :wink:

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:16 pm
by wtrc
Mort_the_Tort wrote:I'm so sorry to hear about the emails.

As I've gotten older, I've realized that what matters most is not where you go or what you're given but that wherever you go and whatever you're given, you kill it and you commit to doing your best. I know we'll all do great wherever we go, as long as we keep at and never give in.

Mort still standing... for now...
Seriously, who are you, and when can I buy you a beer?

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:17 pm
by lastsamurai
wtrc wrote:
The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.

Sort of inclined to exercise dictatorial powers and do a runoff between the top two candidates :wink:
Please do so that they JSMaybes can join the JSW camp and this can be settled once and for all.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:18 pm
by lawschool22
wtrc wrote:
The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.

Sort of inclined to exercise dictatorial powers and do a runoff between the top two candidates :wink:
I'd be down for that. But I can't decide if JSMaybes would be more inclined to vote for JSW or JSJK lol

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:18 pm
by gbelle
lawschool22 wrote:
wtrc wrote:
The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.

Sort of inclined to exercise dictatorial powers and do a runoff between the top two candidates :wink:
I'd be down for that. But I can't decide if JSMaybes would be more inclined to vote for JSW or JSJK lol
I voted for JSMaybe. But if I could, I'd like to switch my vote to JSJK

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:20 pm
by drawstring
JSW is pithy and to the point, but it's just so blah.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:20 pm
by The-Specs
Just two votes now...

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:21 pm
by edwardt1988
The great schism of 2014. JSJk vs JSW. I personally cannot trust nor befriend anyone who chooses JSW