Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:29 pm
using my 1999 to saySteelPenguin wrote:At least Harvard was pretty fast with their rejection. Now I can go back to hating MA. GPA and LSAT both ~25%
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=214072
using my 1999 to saySteelPenguin wrote:At least Harvard was pretty fast with their rejection. Now I can go back to hating MA. GPA and LSAT both ~25%
Sorry, SP .SteelPenguin wrote:At least Harvard was pretty fast with their rejection. Now I can go back to hating MA. GPA and LSAT both ~25%
Sorry to hear.scoobysnax wrote:Just got my JSNo a few minutes ago. Wish I had ED'd Columbia now :/
Submitted November, no JS1, 172/3.6X
I don't think you have to worry Philly. UVA doesn't really have a need for lsats over a 171, I think you'll be solid for CCphillywc wrote:Yeah that changed my view on the cycle :/scoobers wrote:I've been scared to check my email ever since philly got WL from UVA :/drawstring wrote:Ya, so, I think I'm going to be staring at my inbox all day.
JS's way of expressing her hatred of TLS (because honestly, this doesn't impact anyone but us.)lawschool22 wrote:I wish they would just decide who was getting dings first, then send out a mass email wave. The slow drip of dings is just salt in the wound.
Sorry to hearSteelPenguin wrote:At least Harvard was pretty fast with their rejection. Now I can go back to hating MA. GPA and LSAT both ~25%
Sorry to hear thatpompoms wrote:Dinged as well
Thanks! I was below both 25ths, but live in the area and had to give it a try.edwardt1988 wrote:Sorry to hear thatpompoms wrote:Dinged as well
+1lawschool22 wrote:Yikesedwardt1988 wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Tariffs 172/3.46 apparently URM and got rejected
Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Seriously, who are you, and when can I buy you a beer?Mort_the_Tort wrote:I'm so sorry to hear about the emails.
As I've gotten older, I've realized that what matters most is not where you go or what you're given but that wherever you go and whatever you're given, you kill it and you commit to doing your best. I know we'll all do great wherever we go, as long as we keep at and never give in.
Mort still standing... for now...
Please do so that they JSMaybes can join the JSW camp and this can be settled once and for all.wtrc wrote:Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Sort of inclined to exercise dictatorial powers and do a runoff between the top two candidates
I'd be down for that. But I can't decide if JSMaybes would be more inclined to vote for JSW or JSJK lolwtrc wrote:Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Sort of inclined to exercise dictatorial powers and do a runoff between the top two candidates
I voted for JSMaybe. But if I could, I'd like to switch my vote to JSJKlawschool22 wrote:I'd be down for that. But I can't decide if JSMaybes would be more inclined to vote for JSW or JSJK lolwtrc wrote:Four votes away. FOUR VOTES.The-Specs wrote:Sorry to hear about all of the JSNo's. The question now is when the JSW's (and I used JSW and not JSJK advisedly) will start rolling out.
Sort of inclined to exercise dictatorial powers and do a runoff between the top two candidates