Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Where are you in the Harvard application process?

I'm applying next year, just reading this thread to prepare
38
12%
Applying this year, I got an extension on my application
1
0%
I applied and haven't gotten a JS1 yet
64
20%
I applied and got a JS1, but haven't had it yet.
7
2%
I had my JS1 but I'm waiting for a magical phone call
43
13%
Already had my JS2, just here to help
62
19%
Waitlisted
61
19%
Dinged D:
49
15%
 
Total votes: 325

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:58 pm

I just can't believe JSJK is winning lol. Well actually I can. :D

User avatar
Gary
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Gary » Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:59 pm

Good morning people! Today, we get into harvard :)
sending positive vibes to the universe as per my moms advice

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:00 pm

Gary wrote:Good morning people! Today, we get into harvard :)
sending positive vibes to the universe as per my moms advice


God. I read that as "Today, I got into harvard"

User avatar
wtrc
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby wtrc » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:04 pm

Runoff, final round, voting poll.

BE A PART OF HISTORY!

User avatar
Gary
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Gary » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:05 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
Gary wrote:Good morning people! Today, we get into harvard :)
sending positive vibes to the universe as per my moms advice


God. I read that as "Today, I got into harvard"


Haha sorry. Don't worry my excitement would be much more apparent if I was actually accepted

User avatar
applelover
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby applelover » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:06 pm

wtrc wrote:Runoff, final round, voting poll.

BE A PART OF HISTORY!



I want to change my vote!!!

User avatar
db1990
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:55 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby db1990 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:08 pm

lawschool22 wrote:I just can't believe JSJK is winning lol. Well actually I can. :D


Ahahaha, yes!

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:11 pm

Come on people, who wants to type more than three letters if they get waitlisted. The fewer letters you type, the sooner you can log off TLS and get to the bar.

JSW FTW

User avatar
midwest17
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby midwest17 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:20 pm

TCR is that thank you notes aren't necessary for JS1s, right?

Edit: I don't mind sending one, but I don't want to bother them with even more emails when my interviewer said that this was a busy time for them.
Last edited by midwest17 on Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:21 pm

midwest17 wrote:TCR is that thank you notes aren't necessary for JS1s, right?


Correct. Per KB.

User avatar
wtrc
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby wtrc » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:22 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
midwest17 wrote:TCR is that thank you notes aren't necessary for JS1s, right?


Correct. Per KB.


Definitely not necessary, but can't hurt... I sent one (to the main admissions office email, don't GoogleStalk your interviewer to find their personal one) and I heard it's prob just placed in the file.

User avatar
wtrc
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby wtrc » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:31 pm

lawschool22 wrote:Come on people, who wants to type more than three letters if they get waitlisted. The fewer letters you type, the sooner you can log off TLS and get to the bar.

JSW FTW


I do agree with this sentiment, actually.

04102014
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby 04102014 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:32 pm

JSJK storming through the gates 8)

User avatar
JD1776
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:08 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby JD1776 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:40 pm

lawschool22 wrote:JSW FTW


+1

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:41 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates 8)


I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?" :(

User avatar
wtrc
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby wtrc » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:43 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates 8)


I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?" :(


While I also support JSW, you are contractually bound by using whichever wins the poll. Sorry :(

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:44 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates 8)


I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?" :(


:lol:

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby koalacity » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:46 pm

JD1776 wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:JSW FTW


+1

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:47 pm

wtrc wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates 8)


I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?" :(


While I also support JSW, you are contractually bound by using whichever wins the poll. Sorry :(


Damn contracts.

User avatar
bbkk
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby bbkk » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:50 pm

JSW sounds like a thing, like JS1 & JS2. While JSjk sounds like a joke, imho.

Crap I voted for the wrong one. :|

User avatar
neprep
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby neprep » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:51 pm

I support JSjk because it's euphonious to my immature text-parlance ears, but I don't understand what it means. Is it, like, JS is saying "You thought you would get in when you got that JS1 but jk…you're not that special"?

User avatar
lawschool22
Posts: 3875
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby lawschool22 » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:52 pm

neprep wrote:I support JSjk because it's euphonious to my immature text-parlance ears, but I don't understand what it means. Is it, like, JS is saying "You thought you would get in when you got that JS1 but jk…you're not that special"?


See that's my quibble, it's somewhat ambiguous. It could also be used for a denial. (I hope you guys know I'm not taking this seriously :lol: )

User avatar
chneyo
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby chneyo » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:54 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

Kimikho
Posts: 3971
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby Kimikho » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:57 pm

neprep wrote:I support JSjk because it's euphonious to my immature text-parlance ears, but I don't understand what it means. Is it, like, JS is saying "You thought you would get in when you got that JS1 but jk…you're not that special"?


exactly. that's why it's amazing.

hi nep

sup_stan
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 3:08 am

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Postby sup_stan » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:59 pm

JkS2!
























































































Is it too late to vote for this to represent the crowd with no JS2 post JS1?




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 7 guests