Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Legally Blonde is on WE again right now if anyone is looking to pass the time with thoughts of HLS!
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Watched it last weekend. My mom walked into the living room when the closing scene was on, looked at me, and said, "You're obcessed."NoDayButToday wrote:Legally Blonde is on WE again right now if anyone is looking to pass the time with thoughts of HLS!
- ShrimpToastMasters
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
i'm very impressed and not at all surprisedscoobers wrote:i know moreShrimpToastMasters wrote:Wow! You know so many IRL (or as IRL as FB is anyways...)jingosaur wrote:
So I was not active at all in the October Waiting Thread until the very last week because I was super super busy the first couple weeks. I PWed a couple of times, but only when lots of other people have PWed. I'm also FB friends, or was at one point, with Philly, Tea, and Armed.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
HLS can claim my 1499th post — but #1500 will go to my personal favorite…
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Have to say that I didn't see this one coming. You're probably breaking JS' heart right now. I suspect it's not often she loses out to Cornell.neprep wrote:HLS can claim my 1499th post — but #1500 will go to my personal favorite…
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
She's too busy reading all the "Where are the JS2's?" posts and laughing to have seen nep's post.koalacity wrote:Have to say that I didn't see this one coming. You're probably breaking JS' heart right now. I suspect it's not often she loses out to Cornell.neprep wrote:HLS can claim my 1499th post — but #1500 will go to my personal favorite…
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
All of my postslawschool22 wrote:She's too busy reading all the "Where are the JS2's?" posts and laughing to have seen nep's post.koalacity wrote:Have to say that I didn't see this one coming. You're probably breaking JS' heart right now. I suspect it's not often she loses out to Cornell.neprep wrote:HLS can claim my 1499th post — but #1500 will go to my personal favorite…
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I will be right there with you once my JS1 is overapplelover wrote:All of my postslawschool22 wrote:She's too busy reading all the "Where are the JS2's?" posts and laughing to have seen nep's post.koalacity wrote:Have to say that I didn't see this one coming. You're probably breaking JS' heart right now. I suspect it's not often she loses out to Cornell.neprep wrote:HLS can claim my 1499th post — but #1500 will go to my personal favorite…
- Jessasaurus
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
It's hard to say. So the average time between JS1 and JS2 for November admits (per our spreadsheet) is 20 days. But that does not meant here won't be another wave of JS2's of which you are a part. It could easily just be them wanting to conduct some more JS1's before making another round of decisions, and you may well be in consideration for that second wave of JS2's.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
At this point, since we don't have any data on who has been denied or wait-listed, it is really hard to say what the timing means in relation to denials and wait-lists.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
ughhhhhhh i hate this boat...lawschool22 wrote:It's hard to say. So the average time between JS1 and JS2 for November admits (per our spreadsheet) is 20 days. But that does not meant here won't be another wave of JS2's of which you are a part. It could easily just be them wanting to conduct some more JS1's before making another round of decisions, and you may well be in consideration for that second wave of JS2's.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
At this point, since we don't have any data on who has been denied or wait-listed, it is really hard to say what the timing means in relation to denials and wait-lists.
but thanks for the feedback ls22!
- lastsamurai
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So, I fully expected to be in that boat as well, so I did a little digging in last year's thread. I found 2 users who reported JS1 invites in the first two waves that were accepted in the second round of JS2s. There was another who interviewed in the first group who heard back on March 25th.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
I'd say there's no reason to lose hope. hth
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Yep, as long as you haven't been denied it means you're still in the race. As they continue to develop a picture of the class I am sure they consider and re-consider people for whom they have yet to make a decision.lastsamurai wrote:So, I fully expected to be in that boat as well, so I did a little digging in last year's thread. I found 2 users who reported JS1 invites in the first two waves that were accepted in the second round of JS2s. There was another who interviewed in the first group who heard back on March 25th.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
I'd say there's no reason to lose hope. hth
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:46 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Ditto. I've more or less accepted that I'll be WL'd at this point. My interview went well and my softs are strong, but I guess HLS is very much a # game at the end of the day.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
Last edited by Humbert Humbert on Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
bless you.lastsamurai wrote:So, I fully expected to be in that boat as well, so I did a little digging in last year's thread. I found 2 users who reported JS1 invites in the first two waves that were accepted in the second round of JS2s. There was another who interviewed in the first group who heard back on March 25th.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
I'd say there's no reason to lose hope. hth
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I don't know if this is 100% true. I have seen some very well-qualified applicants from a numbers perspective be denied, and some definite reaches be accepted. Obviously it is not pervasive, but you see it enough that it seems like they are looking at more than just the numbers. Also, the content of the interviews we have seen so far leads me to believe that they are interested in other aspects of the application outside of the numbers.Humbert Humbert wrote:Ditto. I've more or less accepted that I'll be WL'd at this point. My interview went well and my softs are strong, but I guess HLS is very much a # game at the end of the day.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:20 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Yeah, I totally agree. I do not have very strong numbers (not above the 50% for either LSAT or GPA), but I think my work experience, LORs and a very specific focus on what I want to do post-graduate school were what got me into Harvard. They're definitely shifting away from just accepting ppl with high numbers.So wouldn't lose hope at all.lawschool22 wrote:I don't know if this is 100% true. I have seen some very well-qualified applicants from a numbers perspective be denied, and some definite reaches be accepted. Obviously it is not pervasive, but you see it enough that it seems like they are looking at more than just the numbers. Also, the content of the interviews we have seen so far leads me to believe that they are interested in other aspects of the application outside of the numbers.Humbert Humbert wrote:Ditto. I've more or less accepted that I'll be WL'd at this point. My interview went well and my softs are strong, but I guess HLS is very much a # game at the end of the day.andapieceoftoast wrote:I'm in this boat -- pls weigh in someone!Jessasaurus wrote:Soooo if I had my JS1 in the first week of November and haven't gotten a JS2, it's likely I'll be waitlisted or rejected right?
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:46 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
lawschool22 wrote:
I don't know if this is 100% true. I have seen some very well-qualified applicants from a numbers perspective be denied, and some definite reaches be accepted. Obviously it is not pervasive, but you see it enough that it seems like they are looking at more than just the numbers. Also, the content of the interviews we have seen so far leads me to believe that they are interested in other aspects of the application outside of the numbers.
Thanks, appreciate it.wrote: Yeah, I totally agree. I do not have very strong numbers (not above the 50% for either LSAT or GPA), but I think my work experience, LORs and a very specific focus on what I want to do post-graduate school were what got me into Harvard. They're definitely shifting away from just accepting ppl with high numbers.So wouldn't lose hope at all.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Also check out the latest posts that took place today in Mike Spivey's thread "Ask a former admissions officer" - it should give a lot of hope to splitters as well.Humbert Humbert wrote:lawschool22 wrote:
I don't know if this is 100% true. I have seen some very well-qualified applicants from a numbers perspective be denied, and some definite reaches be accepted. Obviously it is not pervasive, but you see it enough that it seems like they are looking at more than just the numbers. Also, the content of the interviews we have seen so far leads me to believe that they are interested in other aspects of the application outside of the numbers.Thanks, appreciate it.wrote: Yeah, I totally agree. I do not have very strong numbers (not above the 50% for either LSAT or GPA), but I think my work experience, LORs and a very specific focus on what I want to do post-graduate school were what got me into Harvard. They're definitely shifting away from just accepting ppl with high numbers.So wouldn't lose hope at all.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Is there no column in the spreadsheet regarding the number of times people took the LSAT?
Any JS1s/JS2s with multiple LSATs, and what was the difference between the scores? If anyone is willing to share that information but doesn't want to do it here, you can PM me
Any JS1s/JS2s with multiple LSATs, and what was the difference between the scores? If anyone is willing to share that information but doesn't want to do it here, you can PM me
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
There is not. I was under this impression this did not have a huge effect on admissions, but if we think it should be added I can certainly do so.edwardt1988 wrote:Is there no column in the spreadsheet regarding the number of times people took the LSAT?
Any JS1s/JS2s with multiple LSATs, and what was the difference between the scores? If anyone is willing to share that information but doesn't want to do it here, you can PM me
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I thought the consensus is that it doesn't really matter except when it comes to HYS. I could be wrong thoughlawschool22 wrote:There is not. I was under this impression this did not have a huge effect on admissions, but if we think it should be added I can certainly do so.edwardt1988 wrote:Is there no column in the spreadsheet regarding the number of times people took the LSAT?
Any JS1s/JS2s with multiple LSATs, and what was the difference between the scores? If anyone is willing to share that information but doesn't want to do it here, you can PM me
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I took it three times, 164, 162, 176.edwardt1988 wrote:Is there no column in the spreadsheet regarding the number of times people took the LSAT?
Any JS1s/JS2s with multiple LSATs, and what was the difference between the scores? If anyone is willing to share that information but doesn't want to do it here, you can PM me
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
And boom goes the dynamite...The-Specs wrote:I took it three times, 164, 162, 176.edwardt1988 wrote:Is there no column in the spreadsheet regarding the number of times people took the LSAT?
Any JS1s/JS2s with multiple LSATs, and what was the difference between the scores? If anyone is willing to share that information but doesn't want to do it here, you can PM me
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login