Well I probably will get waitlisted, I just hope when I do I can announce it using the superior acronym.Gary wrote:lol i thought this meant you were waitlisted and i had a panic attack...lawschool22 wrote:Post 1600:
JSW FTW
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
The-Specs wrote:Vitriol?? Nep, I thought we were making such progress!neprep wrote:Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw
I was team JSW all along, but deliberately made poor arguments in favor of JSjk that were meant to be at once ironic to those that got them and convincing those who didn't to go with its rival.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Fooled meneprep wrote:The-Specs wrote:Vitriol?? Nep, I thought we were making such progress!neprep wrote:Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw
I was team JSW all along, but deliberately made poor arguments in favor of JSjk that were meant to be at once ironic to those that got them and convincing those who didn't to go with its rival.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
THE PLOT THICKENSneprep wrote: lucillewink.gif
I was team JSW all along, but deliberately made poor arguments in favor of JSjk that were meant to be at once ironic to those that got them and convincing those that didn't to go with its rival.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I mean come on, I was literally making APPEALS TO EMOTION. That only works on Boston Legal.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I feel like I am watching a twisted version of this last presidential election with Romney winning the Republican Primary but then getting CRUSHED by Obama in the general election.
The only problem here is that JSW is Obama this time around but would have been a combination of Gingrich and Santorum in the previous round…i guess every analogy breaks down eventually.
The only problem here is that JSW is Obama this time around but would have been a combination of Gingrich and Santorum in the previous round…i guess every analogy breaks down eventually.
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
LOLneprep wrote:I mean come on, I was literally making APPEALS TO EMOTION. That only works on Boston Legal.
But this is the Harvard thread so maybe you can see why I would think that what works in Boston Legal would seem to work here.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Egregious anti-Stanford trolling.lawschool22 wrote:We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Phew --- FRIENDSscoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Taffy got a Stanford letter to fill out her hys sweeplawschool22 wrote:We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I didn't apply because GPA. So I have no idea what's going on over there lol.koalacity wrote:Egregious anti-Stanford trolling.lawschool22 wrote:We need some JS2's, Penn acceptances, or UChi acceptance, or this subforum is going to explode.
- 05062014
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Does this not sound like a mean girl ? I rest my casescoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Logic fail pieceoftoast, all we can know for certainty is that if you do NOT like JSJK that you canNOT befriends. We can't be certain that you will be friends with Scoobs just because you like JSJK. hthandapieceoftoast wrote:Phew --- FRIENDSscoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
I love you though!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You still stand a chance of being scoobsjk'dlawschool22 wrote:scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Logic fail anyone who likes toast is my friendThe-Specs wrote:Logic fail pieceoftoast, all we can know for certainty is that if you do NOT like JSJK that you canNOT befriends. We can't be certain that you will be friends with Scoobs just because you like JSJK. hthandapieceoftoast wrote:Phew --- FRIENDSscoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
I love you though!
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I don't know what that is but I like itscoobers wrote:You still stand a chance of being scoobsjk'dlawschool22 wrote:scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Perhaps, but not a mean girl from Mean Girls. Regina George doesn't make her criteria for selecting friends and foes (a) public and (b) easy.abdistotle wrote:Does this not sound like a mean girl ? I rest my casescoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I thought about making it something like "I'll just pretend to be your friend but not really" a la mean girls but let's be real that's not really my thing.lawschool22 wrote:I don't know what that is but I like itscoobers wrote:You still stand a chance of being scoobsjk'dlawschool22 wrote:scoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
I think it is more "lol jk you are all my friends ilu all"
- Gary
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
ughhhhlafdkjasldfk;jsadasdfskajdfksjaklf
sorry i have to express my feelings about the lack of movement somewhere
sorry i have to express my feelings about the lack of movement somewhere
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
We are so friends againlawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login