Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:58 pm

I just can't believe JSJK is winning lol. Well actually I can.

Gary · Post by **Gary** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:59 pm

Good morning people! Today, we get into harvard

sending positive vibes to the universe as per my moms advice

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:00 pm

Gary wrote:Good morning people! Today, we get into harvard
sending positive vibes to the universe as per my moms advice

God. I read that as "Today, I got into harvard"

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:04 pm

Runoff, final round, voting poll.

BE A PART OF HISTORY!

Gary · Post by **Gary** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:05 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
Gary wrote:Good morning people! Today, we get into harvard
sending positive vibes to the universe as per my moms advice
God. I read that as "Today, I got into harvard"

Haha sorry. Don't worry my excitement would be much more apparent if I was actually accepted

applelover · Post by **applelover** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:06 pm

wtrc wrote:Runoff, final round, voting poll.

BE A PART OF HISTORY!

I want to change my vote!!!

db1990 · Post by **db1990** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:08 pm

lawschool22 wrote:I just can't believe JSJK is winning lol. Well actually I can.

Ahahaha, yes!

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:11 pm

Come on people, who wants to type more than three letters if they get waitlisted. The fewer letters you type, the sooner you can log off TLS and get to the bar.

JSW FTW

midwest17 · Post by **midwest17** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:20 pm

TCR is that thank you notes aren't necessary for JS1s, right?

Edit: I don't mind sending one, but I don't want to bother them with even more emails when my interviewer said that this was a busy time for them.

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:21 pm

midwest17 wrote:TCR is that thank you notes aren't necessary for JS1s, right?

Correct. Per KB.

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:22 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
midwest17 wrote:TCR is that thank you notes aren't necessary for JS1s, right?
Correct. Per KB.

Definitely not necessary, but can't hurt... I sent one (to the main admissions office email, don't GoogleStalk your interviewer to find their personal one) and I heard it's prob just placed in the file.

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:31 pm

lawschool22 wrote:Come on people, who wants to type more than three letters if they get waitlisted. The fewer letters you type, the sooner you can log off TLS and get to the bar.

JSW FTW

I do agree with this sentiment, actually.

04102014 · Post by **04102014** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:32 pm

JSJK storming through the gates

JD1776 · Post by **JD1776** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:40 pm

lawschool22 wrote:JSW FTW

+1

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:41 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates

I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?"

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:43 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates
I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?"

While I also support JSW, you are contractually bound by using whichever wins the poll. Sorry

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:44 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates
I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?"

koalacity · Post by **koalacity** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:46 pm

JD1776 wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:JSW FTW
+1

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:47 pm

wtrc wrote:
lawschool22 wrote:
ohpobrecito wrote:JSJK storming through the gates
I'll use JSW until the day I die. And my death will probably come from explaining to people what JSW means 1,000,000 times. They'll be like, "oh, so that's just the same thing as a JSJK?"
While I also support JSW, you are contractually bound by using whichever wins the poll. Sorry

Damn contracts.

bbkk · Post by **bbkk** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:50 pm

JSW sounds like a thing, like JS1 & JS2. While JSjk sounds like a joke, imho.

Crap I voted for the wrong one.

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:51 pm

I support JSjk because it's euphonious to my immature text-parlance ears, but I don't understand what it means. Is it, like, JS is saying "You thought you would get in when you got that JS1 but jk…you're not that special"?

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:52 pm

neprep wrote:I support JSjk because it's euphonious to my immature text-parlance ears, but I don't understand what it means. Is it, like, JS is saying "You thought you would get in when you got that JS1 but jk…you're not that special"?

See that's my quibble, it's somewhat ambiguous. It could also be used for a denial. (I hope you guys know I'm not taking this seriously

)

chneyo · Post by **chneyo** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:54 pm

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:57 pm

neprep wrote:I support JSjk because it's euphonious to my immature text-parlance ears, but I don't understand what it means. Is it, like, JS is saying "You thought you would get in when you got that JS1 but jk…you're not that special"?

exactly. that's why it's amazing.

hi nep

sup_stan · Post by **sup_stan** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:59 pm

JkS2!

Is it too late to vote for this to represent the crowd with no JS2 post JS1?

Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum

Where are you in the Harvard application process?

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Register for access!

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Register now!

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?