Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Just saw in my LSN feed that someone was accepted to Harvard 30 minutes ago and I almost had a heart attack.
Turns out it was some dude admitted in December updating his profile.
Turns out it was some dude admitted in December updating his profile.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
There were a total of 44 JS1 days reported in the spreadsheet, plus 1 for today, giving you 45. There are 5 JS2 days. So 11.1% of JS1 days also had JS2's. But I'm not sure how surprising that is, since we know JS1's come out much more frequently. I think the takeaway is that the one doesn't really influence the other. Meaning if you have JS1's come out that doesn't predict JS2's later in the day nor does it preclude it. Also don't forget this is all just correlation we are looking at.IrishJew wrote: Sincee you're already doing the analysis, what about the other way? What percent of JS1 days have other news on them?
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I almost had a heart attack reading the first sentence of your post.IrishJew wrote:Just saw in my LSN feed that someone was accepted to Harvard 30 minutes ago and I almost had a heart attack.
Turns out it was some dude admitted in December updating his profile.
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I know i'm probably not getting a JS1 but it doesn't stop me from getting my stupid hopes up every time they go out.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Yeah, makes sense. IT's too bad LSN doesn't keep track of JS1s; I'd really like to do a similar analysis for January 2013. But I think we've clearly seen that this cycle's timing seems to be rather different from last year's, so that may actually be counter-productive.lawschool22 wrote:There were a total of 44 JS1 days reported in the spreadsheet, plus 1 for today, giving you 45. There are 5 JS2 days. So 11.1% of JS1 days also had JS2's. But I'm not sure how surprising that is, since we know JS1's come out much more frequently. I think the takeaway is that the one doesn't really influence the other. Meaning if you have JS1's come out that doesn't predict JS2's later in the day nor does it preclude it. Also don't forget this is all just correlation we are looking at.IrishJew wrote: Sincee you're already doing the analysis, what about the other way? What percent of JS1 days have other news on them?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JS1
Last edited by fivestarfolds on Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So I looked at the spreadsheet data again, but a little differently.IrishJew wrote:Yeah, makes sense. IT's too bad LSN doesn't keep track of JS1s; I'd really like to do a similar analysis for January 2013. But I think we've clearly seen that this cycle's timing seems to be rather different from last year's, so that may actually be counter-productive.lawschool22 wrote:There were a total of 44 JS1 days reported in the spreadsheet, plus 1 for today, giving you 45. There are 5 JS2 days. So 11.1% of JS1 days also had JS2's. But I'm not sure how surprising that is, since we know JS1's come out much more frequently. I think the takeaway is that the one doesn't really influence the other. Meaning if you have JS1's come out that doesn't predict JS2's later in the day nor does it preclude it. Also don't forget this is all just correlation we are looking at.IrishJew wrote: Sincee you're already doing the analysis, what about the other way? What percent of JS1 days have other news on them?
We have a total of 87 individual JS2 dates in the spreadsheet (obviously there are multiple for each of the 6 actual days JS2's have come out). Of those, 64 JS2 dates occurred on a day where there were JS1's. So if you look at it this way, 74% of the total JS2's released (per the spreadsheet) occurred on a day with JS1's.
Again, this probably speaks more to the fact that there have been 45 "JS1 days" since 10/31 (first JS1 in the spreadsheet) out of 55ish business days since that time, so again it's likely random. But still interesting.
- Pneumonia
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
lawschool22 wrote:Congrats! Lots of good new so far today. Let's hope they don't decide to "balance" that out this afternoon lolPneumonia wrote:JS1 invite today, complete in the second week of December. High LSAT, very low (for H) GPA.
Thanks, i'm happy to be in such illustrious company.The-Specs wrote:Yah!!! That's what I'm talkin' 'bout!Pneumonia wrote:JS1 invite today, complete in the second week of December. High LSAT, very low (for H) GPA.
Congrats Pneumonia.
ETA: Also, post 775, this one's for you Pneumonia.
Good luck to those waiting on JS2's!
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.lawschool22 wrote:So I looked at the spreadsheet data again, but a little differently.IrishJew wrote:Yeah, makes sense. IT's too bad LSN doesn't keep track of JS1s; I'd really like to do a similar analysis for January 2013. But I think we've clearly seen that this cycle's timing seems to be rather different from last year's, so that may actually be counter-productive.lawschool22 wrote:There were a total of 44 JS1 days reported in the spreadsheet, plus 1 for today, giving you 45. There are 5 JS2 days. So 11.1% of JS1 days also had JS2's. But I'm not sure how surprising that is, since we know JS1's come out much more frequently. I think the takeaway is that the one doesn't really influence the other. Meaning if you have JS1's come out that doesn't predict JS2's later in the day nor does it preclude it. Also don't forget this is all just correlation we are looking at.IrishJew wrote: Sincee you're already doing the analysis, what about the other way? What percent of JS1 days have other news on them?
We have a total of 87 individual JS2 dates in the spreadsheet (obviously there are multiple for each of the 6 actual days JS2's have come out). Of those, 64 JS2 dates occurred on a day where there were JS1's. So if you look at it this way, 74% of the total JS2's released (per the spreadsheet) occurred on a day with JS1's.
Again, this probably speaks more to the fact that there have been 45 "JS1 days" since 10/31 (first JS1 in the spreadsheet) out of 55ish business days since that time, so again it's likely random. But still interesting.
Of course, even if JS2s come with JS1s, that doesn't mean that JS1s signal JS2s, since there are far more JS1 days than JS2 days. That leaves me wondering if JS1s come out mostly in large clumps with a few smaller batches here and there or if they are well-distributed. (Your recent posts imply that JS2s clump heavily, with 75% of them coming out on only 3 days while the other two days together only had about 25%. Do JS1s behave similarly?) If so, is one kind of "JS1 day" (heavy or light) more likely to be correlated with JS2s?
- Balthy
- Posts: 665
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
phillywc wrote: I know i'm probably not getting a JS1 but it doesn't stop me from getting my stupid hopes up every time they go out.
Same
And to add insult to injury i received a wave of TTT marketing emails today. Every time i heard the email noise i thought it was my beloved JS1.
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JS1s seem to come either in waves or at random times. Today definitely seems to have been a JS1 waveIrishJew wrote:Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.lawschool22 wrote:So I looked at the spreadsheet data again, but a little differently.IrishJew wrote:Yeah, makes sense. IT's too bad LSN doesn't keep track of JS1s; I'd really like to do a similar analysis for January 2013. But I think we've clearly seen that this cycle's timing seems to be rather different from last year's, so that may actually be counter-productive.lawschool22 wrote: There were a total of 44 JS1 days reported in the spreadsheet, plus 1 for today, giving you 45. There are 5 JS2 days. So 11.1% of JS1 days also had JS2's. But I'm not sure how surprising that is, since we know JS1's come out much more frequently. I think the takeaway is that the one doesn't really influence the other. Meaning if you have JS1's come out that doesn't predict JS2's later in the day nor does it preclude it. Also don't forget this is all just correlation we are looking at.
We have a total of 87 individual JS2 dates in the spreadsheet (obviously there are multiple for each of the 6 actual days JS2's have come out). Of those, 64 JS2 dates occurred on a day where there were JS1's. So if you look at it this way, 74% of the total JS2's released (per the spreadsheet) occurred on a day with JS1's.
Again, this probably speaks more to the fact that there have been 45 "JS1 days" since 10/31 (first JS1 in the spreadsheet) out of 55ish business days since that time, so again it's likely random. But still interesting.
Of course, even if JS2s come with JS1s, that doesn't mean that JS1s signal JS2s, since there are far more JS1 days than JS2 days. That leaves me wondering if JS1s come out mostly in large clumps with a few smaller batches here and there or if they are well-distributed. (Your recent posts imply that JS2s clump heavily, with 75% of them coming out on only 3 days while the other two days together only had about 25%. Do JS1s behave similarly?) If so, is one kind of "JS1 day" (heavy or light) more likely to be correlated with JS2s?
- patfeeney
- Posts: 438
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
California Southern and Savannah in the past hour.Balthy wrote:phillywc wrote: I know i'm probably not getting a JS1 but it doesn't stop me from getting my stupid hopes up every time they go out.
Same
And to add insult to injury i received a wave of TTT marketing emails today. Every time i heard the email noise i thought it was my beloved JS1.
[Edit 3:54] UC Irvine, Wayne, and OU since.
wah
Last edited by patfeeney on Mon Jan 13, 2014 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JS1 days are fairly well distributed. Here is the profile of the number of people with a JS1 per JS1 invite day:IrishJew wrote:
Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.
Of course, even if JS2s come with JS1s, that doesn't mean that JS1s signal JS2s, since there are far more JS1 days than JS2 days. That leaves me wondering if JS1s come out mostly in large clumps with a few smaller batches here and there or if they are well-distributed. (Your recent posts imply that JS2s clump heavily, with 75% of them coming out on only 3 days while the other two days together only had about 25%. Do JS1s behave similarly?) If so, is one kind of "JS1 day" (heavy or light) more likely to be correlated with JS2s?
Mode: 1
Medan: 2
Max: 11, Count: 1
Min: 1, Count:
Avg: 2.37
Std. Dev: 1.9
I don't think we can glean much from this. The one "wave" we had (with 11 people) was way back on 10/16, likely too early for any JS2's to come out that day.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- illyria
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:26 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Love the over-analyzation in the thread. Only thing keeping me sane at the moment
- nothingtosee
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 12:08 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Any 3.8x 173s complete 12/18 or before NOT have a JS1 yet? (yeah superspecific, but hey, what else are we here for?)
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I forgot about this part. If we remove the 12/23 JS2's (there were seven), which could be, as you say, tossed off before the holiday, then we arrive at a total of 64/80 JS2's going out on day's with JS1's, which puts us at 80%.IrishJew wrote:
Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.
Now we're just messing with the data ("two kinds of lies..."), but it's fun lol.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Gotcha. Didn't realize there are so many days with just one or two JS1s. Today feels like a lot, but maybe that's just because they keep getting discussed and congratulated. Either way I guess it isn't very predictive.lawschool22 wrote:JS1 days are fairly well distributed. Here is the profile of the number of people with a JS1 per JS1 invite day:IrishJew wrote:
Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.
Of course, even if JS2s come with JS1s, that doesn't mean that JS1s signal JS2s, since there are far more JS1 days than JS2 days. That leaves me wondering if JS1s come out mostly in large clumps with a few smaller batches here and there or if they are well-distributed. (Your recent posts imply that JS2s clump heavily, with 75% of them coming out on only 3 days while the other two days together only had about 25%. Do JS1s behave similarly?) If so, is one kind of "JS1 day" (heavy or light) more likely to be correlated with JS2s?
Mode: 1
Medan: 2
Max: 11, Count: 1
Min: 1, Count:
Avg: 2.37
Std. Dev: 1.9
I don't think we can glean much from this. The one "wave" we had (with 11 people) was way back on 10/16, likely too early for any JS2's to come out that day.
Now I just have to get myself a straw and a watch so I can suck it up and wait....
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So? What? You're saying JS2s are even more likely to come with JS1s than not?lawschool22 wrote:I forgot about this part. If we remove the 12/23 JS2's (there were seven), which could be, as you say, tossed off before the holiday, then we arrive at a total of 64/80 JS2's going out on day's with JS1's, which puts us at 80%.IrishJew wrote:
Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.
Now we're just messing with the data ("two kinds of lies..."), but it's fun lol.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Well if we remove 12/23 on the grounds that it's an "anomaly" and they were just trying to get them out before the holidays, then yes, the correlation increases to 80%. But I don't know that we can justify removing 12/23, so I think the correlation of 74% is more defensible.IrishJew wrote:So? What? You're saying JS2s are even more likely to come with JS1s than not?lawschool22 wrote:I forgot about this part. If we remove the 12/23 JS2's (there were seven), which could be, as you say, tossed off before the holiday, then we arrive at a total of 64/80 JS2's going out on day's with JS1's, which puts us at 80%.IrishJew wrote:
Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.
Now we're just messing with the data ("two kinds of lies..."), but it's fun lol.
It's all wild speculation to pass the time though, so it doesn't matter either way lol.
- jaesonko
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:22 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
JS1 today! Submitted first week of December, 172 / above 75th GPA.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I think even without removing 12/23 74% is interesting enough that you don't need to go manipulating data.lawschool22 wrote:Well if we remove 12/23 on the grounds that it's an "anomaly" and they were just trying to get them out before the holidays, then yes, the correlation increases to 80%. But I don't know that we can justify removing 12/23, so I think the correlation of 74% is more defensible.IrishJew wrote:So? What? You're saying JS2s are even more likely to come with JS1s than not?lawschool22 wrote:I forgot about this part. If we remove the 12/23 JS2's (there were seven), which could be, as you say, tossed off before the holiday, then we arrive at a total of 64/80 JS2's going out on day's with JS1's, which puts us at 80%.IrishJew wrote:
Not necessarily. Since only 3/5 JS2 days were JS1 days, randomness would predict something around 60%, so your finding of 75% could be significant. Perhaps their office has days that are primarily for notification and days that are primarily for review and other functions, and the other 25% of JS2s were just tossed off during downtime or before the holiday.
Now we're just messing with the data ("two kinds of lies..."), but it's fun lol.
It's all wild speculation to pass the time though, so it doesn't matter either way lol.
Anyway, yeah, it's all just an attempt to forget about the fact that we're a bunch of type-A overachievers who now have literally zero control over what happens to us.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Dang, this might take the record for most JS1's in the same day.jaesonko wrote:JS1 today! Submitted first week of December, 172 / above 75th GPA.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
It certainly is interesting, and sort of goes against the common fear/question of "so there were JS1's, does that mean no JS2's today?"IrishJew wrote:
I think even without removing 12/23 74% is interesting enough that you don't need to go manipulating data.
Anyway, yeah, it's all just an attempt to forget about the fact that we're a bunch of type-A overachievers who now have literally zero control over what happens to us.
- residentemma
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:54 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Does JS2 just mean an admissions decision via email?? I don't speak Harvard...
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Acceptance phone call for most. Internationals get it via email.residentemma wrote:Does JS2 just mean an admissions decision via email?? I don't speak Harvard...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login