UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 10:15 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Finally got my email for the 13K. Email makes it sound like it's all we're getting from Hastings, everything else will come from federal?
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
No. Federal is loans only for law school.purplethunder wrote:Finally got my email for the 13K. Email makes it sound like it's all we're getting from Hastings, everything else will come from federal?
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:33 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Just got this email from Hastings (for those that got the 13k):
(Note: Please disregard this email if you have already received it. We are resending it because we have recently been made aware of a technical glitch that existed in our email system on the day it was originally sent. We apologize for any confusion this duplicate email may cause.)
If you're waiting on scholarship news you may want to see if it ended up in the spam filter.
(I had already received the initial email saying I got 13k)
(Note: Please disregard this email if you have already received it. We are resending it because we have recently been made aware of a technical glitch that existed in our email system on the day it was originally sent. We apologize for any confusion this duplicate email may cause.)
If you're waiting on scholarship news you may want to see if it ended up in the spam filter.
(I had already received the initial email saying I got 13k)
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Haha I was so excited for a second before I read the rest of that emailcalmenda wrote:Just got this email from Hastings (for those that got the 13k):
(Note: Please disregard this email if you have already received it. We are resending it because we have recently been made aware of a technical glitch that existed in our email system on the day it was originally sent. We apologize for any confusion this duplicate email may cause.)
If you're waiting on scholarship news you may want to see if it ended up in the spam filter.
(I had already received the initial email saying I got 13k)
- BlackCanary
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I initially thought they were rescinding all aid.Moonlight wrote: Haha I was so excited for a second before I read the rest of that email
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mac35352
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:17 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Didn't get either email. I emailed them asking about it and got no response. I think I see a huge RETAKE sign in my future. LoL
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:59 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
SO glad I read this as mine had gone to my junk mail! Got the 13k!
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
You should seek out people who retook in real life. Most haven't done well. TLS is a very different sample of people.mac35352 wrote:Didn't get either email. I emailed them asking about it and got no response. I think I see a huge RETAKE sign in my future. LoL
- Cal Trask
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:40 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I retook and got the exact same score.Moonlight wrote:You should seek out people who retook in real life. Most haven't done well. TLS is a very different sample of people.mac35352 wrote:Didn't get either email. I emailed them asking about it and got no response. I think I see a huge RETAKE sign in my future. LoL
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:33 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I retook and got the exact same score as well. I studied a ton the 2nd time.
- Dingo Starr
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:50 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Hastings better up their fin aid offers.
If Obama's proposed 2015 budget changes gain traction I am sorely screwed with only 13k off sticker and I bet I'm not the only one.
If Obama's proposed 2015 budget changes gain traction I am sorely screwed with only 13k off sticker and I bet I'm not the only one.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
[quote="Dingo Starr"]Hastings better up their fin aid offers.
If Obama's proposed 2015 budget changes gain traction I am sorely screwed with only 13k off sticker and I bet I'm not the only one.[/quote
What's going on for the 2015 budget?
And yea see there's 2 examples of retakes and no better. I have tons of friends in that boat too.
If Obama's proposed 2015 budget changes gain traction I am sorely screwed with only 13k off sticker and I bet I'm not the only one.[/quote
What's going on for the 2015 budget?
And yea see there's 2 examples of retakes and no better. I have tons of friends in that boat too.
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:33 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm afraid to even ask the link between the proposed budget and law school.
Hopefully this won't devolve into partisan bickering.
Hopefully this won't devolve into partisan bickering.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Devolve? We never got out of partisan bickering lol.calmenda wrote:I'm afraid to even ask the link between the proposed budget and law school.
Hopefully this won't devolve into partisan bickering.
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:33 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Only thing I have seen:
"The budget would make permanent the American Opportunity Tax Credit, benefiting about 11.5 million families and students with an average of more than $1,100 to help pay college costs. Another proposal would simplify tax treatment of 9 million Pell grant recipients."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-0 ... rowth.html
Is there something I am missing?
"The budget would make permanent the American Opportunity Tax Credit, benefiting about 11.5 million families and students with an average of more than $1,100 to help pay college costs. Another proposal would simplify tax treatment of 9 million Pell grant recipients."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-0 ... rowth.html
Is there something I am missing?
- Cal Trask
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:40 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm in the same boat, brother.Dingo Starr wrote:Hastings better up their fin aid offers.
If Obama's proposed 2015 budget changes gain traction I am sorely screwed with only 13k off sticker and I bet I'm not the only one.
- Dingo Starr
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:50 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Heads out of the sand, guys.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=225724
There are two other threads about it that you can find using searchwords PSLF or PAYE
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=225724
There are two other threads about it that you can find using searchwords PSLF or PAYE
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Systematic1
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:14 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Define well?Moonlight wrote:You should seek out people who retook in real life. Most haven't done well. TLS is a very different sample of people.mac35352 wrote:Didn't get either email. I emailed them asking about it and got no response. I think I see a huge RETAKE sign in my future. LoL
"From a scoring standpoint, test takers who repeat the LSAT increase their scores by an average of 2.8 points the second time they take the test, and increase by another 2.1 points the third time they take the test (as compared to the second time). While those are only averages, they suggest that sitting for the LSAT again is likely to bump up your score..."
http://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/lsa ... istics.cfm
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:33 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Thanks for the link. I quickly skimmed through the thread. If that budget passes I would be disappointed since I am interested/considering a public service job. With that said - a lot has to happen for it to pass and given the current situation in the house I'm not confident that would actually happen.
Also, the "head in the sand" comment is a bit over the top for this type of forum.
Also, the "head in the sand" comment is a bit over the top for this type of forum.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 1:41 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
anyone get the need access form acknowldegment email before getting a decision?
- Cal Trask
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:40 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I didn't, but they told me to apply for it before I received a decision. I wouldn't imagine that this has any bearing.tom_thumb wrote:anyone get the need access form acknowldegment email before getting a decision?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Powerscore is a LSAT prep company. What do you expect them to say? Also 2 points is within the Standard Deviation range.Systematic1 wrote:Define well?Moonlight wrote:You should seek out people who retook in real life. Most haven't done well. TLS is a very different sample of people.mac35352 wrote:Didn't get either email. I emailed them asking about it and got no response. I think I see a huge RETAKE sign in my future. LoL
"From a scoring standpoint, test takers who repeat the LSAT increase their scores by an average of 2.8 points the second time they take the test, and increase by another 2.1 points the third time they take the test (as compared to the second time). While those are only averages, they suggest that sitting for the LSAT again is likely to bump up your score..."
http://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/lsa ... istics.cfm
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 1:41 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
bearing on...?Cal Trask wrote:I didn't, but they told me to apply for it before I received a decision. I wouldn't imagine that this has any bearing.tom_thumb wrote:anyone get the need access form acknowldegment email before getting a decision?
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:33 am
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
My thoughts exactly. It does not surprise me that a test prep company would encourage people to retake (and pay for more test prep while they are at it). While I had the same score while taking it twice I have friends that improved but not by much. I had one friend who actually received a lower score the second time around. This is all anecdotal. To each their own but taking it twice was enough for me.
- Cal Trask
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:40 pm
Re: UC Hastings c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Your admission decision.tom_thumb wrote:bearing on...?Cal Trask wrote:I didn't, but they told me to apply for it before I received a decision. I wouldn't imagine that this has any bearing.tom_thumb wrote:anyone get the need access form acknowldegment email before getting a decision?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login