WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

How old are you?

21-
11
12%
22-23
27
29%
24-26
38
40%
27-30
14
15%
30+
4
4%
 
Total votes: 94

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:10 pm

I just want to remind everyone to please write-in me for 1L SBA, tyia #campaigning

User avatar
PourMeTea
Posts: 6508
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 am

Post removed.

Postby PourMeTea » Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:29 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by PourMeTea on Thu May 07, 2015 11:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:32 pm

I did not submit a candidate statement, just campaign slogan: I won't take your booze

User avatar
mann124
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby mann124 » Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:35 pm

is it just my section, or are there are lot of people on addy?

User avatar
chuckbass
Posts: 9957
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby chuckbass » Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:42 pm

mann124 wrote:is it just my section, or are there are lot of people on addy?

what is that in reference to?

User avatar
mann124
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2014 3:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby mann124 » Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:53 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:
mann124 wrote:is it just my section, or are there are lot of people on addy?

what is that in reference to?


self-evident, no?

User avatar
chuckbass
Posts: 9957
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby chuckbass » Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:54 pm

mann124 wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:
mann124 wrote:is it just my section, or are there are lot of people on addy?

what is that in reference to?


self-evident, no?

Oh god who are you?

User avatar
SCHT4107
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:52 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby SCHT4107 » Mon Oct 13, 2014 3:01 pm

Has anyone found additional Baker exams?

User avatar
DoveBodyWash
Posts: 3087
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby DoveBodyWash » Thu Oct 23, 2014 1:32 pm

mann124 wrote:is it just my section, or are there are lot of people on addy?

assume everyone is on addy
SCHT4107 wrote:Has anyone found additional Baker exams?

Baker releases them when it gets closer to exam time

SowhatsNU
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby SowhatsNU » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:37 am

sublime wrote:
MagicMike80 wrote:KONIG

This was my best grade of the year and it came as a total surprise. It doesn't matter if you read or don't read, like the guy or hate the guy, participate or don't participate, this is going to be your most nerve-wracking and frustrating exam to study for because it's unclear if he even knows what he's looking for. I honestly did not even do practice exams because I had no idea what a model answer would look like or how to discuss it with other people in the class. For those of you in section D who also have Tamanaha, get ready to change gears and quickly. Those two professors could not be more polar opposites.

That being said, Konig does tip his hand during the term. He spends 15 minutes going through the facts of each case because he's a historian by blood, and his understanding of property law is that it is very fact specific. So when you're practicing, don't get caught up in the legal principle and perfectly expressing it - the Sprankling version will do. The important part is understanding which facts are critical, and how slight tweaks to them change the entire hypothetical. The tweaking was the difference between people that were median and the people that did exceptionally. Konig wants to hear a bunch of hypotheticals he hasn't even put in the question. If you go off on a tangent about what would happen if people in the problem died, or got divorced, or were crossing their fingers when they made certain promises, you're actually starting to think like him. And may god have mercy on your soul.

Also, general tip, when a professor starts speaking in another language or laughing at his own jokes, take notes.



Konig was my worst doctrinal grade, but this is credited. I tried to treat it like a LS exam. Don't.



Hi, sorry to bother you but I saw this and was hoping you could please elaborate? I have Konig now and I went to him yesterday and he said his test will be like any other law school test and you should approach it the same way. Is that incorrect? If you don't mind me asking, what approach to the test do you think is best?

Thanks in advance for your help, I really appreciate it, and hope you've got an amazing SA at somewhere like cravath!

Life2good893
Posts: 133
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:22 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Life2good893 » Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:06 pm

Got a very large scholarship offer yesterday... normal to send a thank you email?

User avatar
LET'S GET IT
Posts: 1299
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby LET'S GET IT » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:20 pm

Life2good893 wrote:Got a very large scholarship offer yesterday... normal to send a thank you email?


I would say skip the thank you. Totally unnecessary and, I think, not normal. Also, this is last year's thread. This year's is:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=233695

adil91
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:54 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby adil91 » Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:21 pm

ooops nvm
Last edited by adil91 on Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chuckbass
Posts: 9957
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby chuckbass » Tue Mar 03, 2015 2:25 pm

adil91 wrote:In this

Just went complete today

3.4 167, how much money do you think I'll get?

How long does it usually take for a decision?

Look above, go to the new thread




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aquinas, Assasindowntheavenue, AZnative, DumbHollywoodActor, govlife, lakers3, Leliana, Long shot hero, nslaw123, warmcherrysoda, Yahoo [Bot] and 30 guests