Hahah yes. I only brot it up to query how we would divvy you up since I had T and sublime had GLET'S GET IT wrote:cusenation wrote:that awkward moment when they have both greenfield and tamanahasublime wrote:Re sections, I am looking forward to finding out which one of you guys will be my protégés and which ones will belong to cuse. Lol
Don't they both have a reputation for being really good?
WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- LET'S GET IT
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Ah gotcha. Thought I might be missing something there.
- peachesthedoge
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:57 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
dat new poll swag
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I just want class off on Wednesdays or Fridays like some sections in the past
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Well Scott, C and D will have Fridays off this coming semester. And E will have Mondays off. No Wednesdays available. HTH
- peachesthedoge
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:57 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Fiero85 wrote:Well Scott, C and D will have Fridays off this coming semester. And E will have Mondays off. No Wednesdays available. HTH
fier0 how u kno dis
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Looked it up on the school website, yo.
- theletterj
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:47 pm
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Mondays off would be amazing also fiero you are a big nerd.peachesthedoge wrote:Fiero85 wrote:Well Scott, C and D will have Fridays off this coming semester. And E will have Mondays off. No Wednesdays available. HTH
fier0 how u kno dis
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Now that I've gone through this, I wish I hadn't seen it since now I want to choose what section I'm in.
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Pff Friday off >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday off
(Bar Review is Thursday night weekly)
But then again, those sections have an awful early week schedule so it evens out kinda.
And knowledge is power Scott. If that's nerdy, so be it
(Bar Review is Thursday night weekly)
But then again, those sections have an awful early week schedule so it evens out kinda.
And knowledge is power Scott. If that's nerdy, so be it
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
This lolscottidsntknow wrote:Now that I've gone through this, I wish I hadn't seen it since now I want to choose what section I'm in.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Despite the early classes, I think ideally I'd want section C because of the professors and Fridays off.Fiero85 wrote:This lolscottidsntknow wrote:Now that I've gone through this, I wish I hadn't seen it since now I want to choose what section I'm in.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Also the important thing to note is that there is a section F. This is not true of the c/o 2016 because of how small they were.
- njdevils2626
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
That leaves us at under 40 students per section. That's pretty damn smallscottidsntknow wrote:Also the important thing to note is that there is a section F. This is not true of the c/o 2016 because of how small they were.
- Fiero85
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Nah I thought that's around normal. 35 to 40 per section/class, twice that for paired classes.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- johnnyquest
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Hopeful that Will's statement of just over 200 students is correct, but if you use last year's numbers and add an extra average section, it'll give you about 227. It would still be under 40 per section though.njdevils2626 wrote:That leaves us at under 40 students per section. That's pretty damn smallscottidsntknow wrote:Also the important thing to note is that there is a section F. This is not true of the c/o 2016 because of how small they were.
-
- Posts: 6874
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by PourMeTea on Fri May 08, 2015 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- njdevils2626
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I think they're trying to duck underPourMeTea wrote:If a few students jump ship, do you think they'll be replaced 1 for 1, or will the administration try to get the class back under a certain size?
-
- Posts: 6874
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by PourMeTea on Fri May 08, 2015 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
PMT I don't think that'd be fair to the other TLSers though... you and I would hog all the A'sPourMeTea wrote:wordnjdevils2626 wrote:I think they're trying to duck underPourMeTea wrote:If a few students jump ship, do you think they'll be replaced 1 for 1, or will the administration try to get the class back under a certain size?
i hope they sequester all the TLSers into a single section
- johnnyquest
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
So many WUSTL TLSers. We're looking at an average of 5 TLSers per section.PourMeTea wrote: word
i hope they sequester all the TLSers into a single section
-
- Posts: 6874
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:32 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by PourMeTea on Fri May 08, 2015 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- johnnyquest
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I foresee many anonymous WUSTL-related posts.PourMeTea wrote:eugh there's no way to be incognito, is therejohnnyquest wrote:So many WUSTL TLSers. We're looking at an average of 5 TLSers per section.PourMeTea wrote: word
i hope they sequester all the TLSers into a single section
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login