WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
2.9% tuition increase for Fall 2014
Brings total up to $49,752
Brings total up to $49,752
- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Well at least 3% is better than some schools. Still not awesome.cusenation wrote:2.9% tuition increase for Fall 2014
Brings total up to $49,752
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I really want them to use WUSTL more in their marketing but maybe they're smart and trying to avoid the inevitable WUSTLUT references...Lebrarian_Booker wrote:rion91 wrote: WUSTLUT?
ahahahahaha, I read that as meaning something TOTALLY different....
- Lebrarian_Booker
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
--ImageRemoved--
- couchpizza
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Usually within a few hours in my experience.couchpizza wrote:Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
- CookieDough
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
24 hours here with an apology for being late responding.scottidsntknow wrote:Usually within a few hours in my experience.couchpizza wrote:Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
That's cute that they consider 24 hours "late."CookieDough wrote:24 hours here with an apology for being late responding.scottidsntknow wrote:Usually within a few hours in my experience.couchpizza wrote:Anyone here ever email admissions? How long do they usually take to get back?
- couchpizza
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 8:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Lol cool, hopefully they get back to me tomorrow. Thanks for the info guys.
- rion91
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
This is goldLebrarian_Booker wrote:--ImageRemoved--
- njdevils2626
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- LET'S GET IT
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I'd agree. If you're trying to thank your interviewer it would make sense to just email them directly, and I really don't think that they'd mind at allLET'S GET IT wrote:I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LET'S GET IT
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Now that Scotty agrees with me I'm seriously reconsidering my opinion.scottidsntknow wrote:I'd agree. If you're trying to thank your interviewer it would make sense to just email them directly, and I really don't think that they'd mind at allLET'S GET IT wrote:I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- CookieDough
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Scotty is right 180% of the time.LET'S GET IT wrote:Now that Scotty agrees with me I'm seriously reconsidering my opinion.scottidsntknow wrote:I'd agree. If you're trying to thank your interviewer it would make sense to just email them directly, and I really don't think that they'd mind at allLET'S GET IT wrote:I vote for the personal e-mail.njdevils2626 wrote:Hey guys, quick question. I'm writing up a thank you follow-up email after my interview earlier today. I was wondering if I should send it to the admissions email or to the personal email of my interviewer? I'm thinking the latter is the proper route, but not 100% sure
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- BlackCanary
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I really thought I had accidentally sent mine before it was ready and was beyond horrified. Guess that's what's I get for writing it on my way to work.sublime wrote:Just make sure there aren't any typos.
And definitely send to the person who interviewed you.
- njdevils2626
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Thanks for confirming my first instinct guys, hoping for good news so I can join you all as admits soon!
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
".....I'm learning towards a career in transactional work..."sublime wrote: Hah. Cuse and I both definitely sent out cover letters to a shitton of firms that had typos. But it isn't likely than any would have hired us anyway. And it didn't appear that anyone actually read them. So fuck it, I guess.
Should have been "leaning towards"
That typo was literally in 9 out of 10 of my cover letters...epic fail.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LET'S GET IT
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Good luck! And Scotty, I was only joking.njdevils2626 wrote:Thanks for confirming my first instinct guys, hoping for good news so I can join you all as admits soon!
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- LET'S GET IT
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
So busy studying you didn't have time to proof read your cover letters? Yeah, go with that. Lol. Pretty sure I caught an even worse error in my PS after I sent it out to all the schools I applied to.sublime wrote:cusenation wrote:".....I'm learning towards a career in transactional work..."sublime wrote: Hah. Cuse and I both definitely sent out cover letters to a shitton of firms that had typos. But it isn't likely than any would have hired us anyway. And it didn't appear that anyone actually read them. So fuck it, I guess.
Should have been "leaning towards"
That typo was literally in 9 out of 10 of my cover letters...epic fail.
That attention to detail is clearly why we did well last semester.
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
/dedsublime wrote:cusenation wrote:".....I'm learning towards a career in transactional work..."sublime wrote: Hah. Cuse and I both definitely sent out cover letters to a shitton of firms that had typos. But it isn't likely than any would have hired us anyway. And it didn't appear that anyone actually read them. So fuck it, I guess.
Should have been "leaning towards"
That typo was literally in 9 out of 10 of my cover letters...epic fail.
That attention to detail is clearly why we did well last semester.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login