WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

How old are you?

21-
11
12%
22-23
27
29%
24-26
38
40%
27-30
14
15%
30+
4
4%
 
Total votes: 94

User avatar
chuckbass
Posts: 9957
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby chuckbass » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:47 am

We are 18, go bears.

User avatar
Ricky-Bobby
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Ricky-Bobby » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:49 am

peachesthedoge wrote:
cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr-law-school-rankings/

We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.



wait is this official??

Would Spivey lie to us? I think not.

It can't be official yet because the rankings aren't released to the public until tomorrow.

User avatar
isuperserial
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:49 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby isuperserial » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:52 am

peachesthedoge wrote:
cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr-law-school-rankings/

We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.



wait is this official??


I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.

User avatar
rion91
Posts: 962
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby rion91 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:58 am

Wow kudos to WUSTL! Looks like Tamanaha is working some magic :lol:

User avatar
MikeSpivey
Posts: 2607
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby MikeSpivey » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:04 pm

isuperserial wrote:
peachesthedoge wrote:
cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr-law-school-rankings/

We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.



wait is this official??


I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.


Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.

I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.

Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!

User avatar
chuckbass
Posts: 9957
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby chuckbass » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:06 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
isuperserial wrote:
peachesthedoge wrote:
cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr-law-school-rankings/

We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.



wait is this official??


I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.


Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.

I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.

Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!

Thanks for the clarification Spivey! And damn that two way tie at 146 is rough...

User avatar
bound
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby bound » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:15 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
isuperserial wrote:
peachesthedoge wrote:
cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr-law-school-rankings/

We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.



wait is this official??


I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.


Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.

I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.

Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!



That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?

pauly_biegler
Posts: 160
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 6:54 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby pauly_biegler » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:36 pm

wow great news. WUSTL on the up and up.

User avatar
JustHawkin
Posts: 1753
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby JustHawkin » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:37 pm

Austinbound wrote:That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?

Get on your twitter grind and follow Spivey.

User avatar
bound
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby bound » Mon Mar 10, 2014 12:39 pm

JustHawkin wrote:
Austinbound wrote:That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?

Get on your twitter grind and follow Spivey.



Lol the rest still aren't posted on twitter.

User avatar
CookieDough
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby CookieDough » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:16 pm

This changes everything!


No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.

User avatar
Ricky-Bobby
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Ricky-Bobby » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:39 pm

CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!


No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.

Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.

Boom. I win.

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:41 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
isuperserial wrote:
peachesthedoge wrote:
cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr-law-school-rankings/

We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.



wait is this official??


I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.


Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.

I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.

Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!


Congrats to WUSTL on the rise, this is exciting news for the school!

User avatar
CookieDough
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby CookieDough » Mon Mar 10, 2014 1:45 pm

Ricky-Bobby wrote:
CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!


No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.

Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.

Boom. I win.


Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.

User avatar
wittyhandle
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:23 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby wittyhandle » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:08 pm

CookieDough wrote:
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!


No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.

Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.

Boom. I win.


Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.


:shock:

User avatar
Ricky-Bobby
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Ricky-Bobby » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:11 pm

wittyhandle wrote:
CookieDough wrote:
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!


No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.

Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.

Boom. I win.


Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.


:shock:

It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.

User avatar
JustHawkin
Posts: 1753
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby JustHawkin » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:13 pm

Ricky-Bobby wrote:
wittyhandle wrote:
CookieDough wrote:Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.


:shock:

It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.

Bahahaha

User avatar
cron1834
Posts: 1918
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby cron1834 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:22 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
isuperserial wrote:
peachesthedoge wrote:
cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr-law-school-rankings/

We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.



wait is this official??


I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.


Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.

I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.

Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!


T-147 4lyfe 8)

User avatar
CookieDough
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby CookieDough » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:34 pm

Ricky-Bobby wrote:
wittyhandle wrote:
CookieDough wrote:
Ricky-Bobby wrote:
Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.

Boom. I win.


Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.


:shock:

It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.


:lol: fair

User avatar
BlackCanary
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby BlackCanary » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:36 pm

You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.

User avatar
Ditka747
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:02 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Ditka747 » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:37 pm

BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.


Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.

User avatar
Lebrarian_Booker
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Lebrarian_Booker » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:38 pm

BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.


As someone who lives in Minnesota I can confirm

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 1303
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby yossarian » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:39 pm

Ditka747 wrote:
BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.


Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.


These are now available at every major suburb of every t50 metro in the nation. The Californians have won.

User avatar
JustHawkin
Posts: 1753
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby JustHawkin » Mon Mar 10, 2014 2:42 pm

Ditka747 wrote:
BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.


Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.

You. I like you.

User avatar
nickpapagiorgio
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:05 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby nickpapagiorgio » Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:02 pm

Has anyone interviewed with Will Fruhwirth? The web site lists him as an admissions coordinator. I have an interview scheduled with this fellow for tomorrow.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”