WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

How old are you?

21-
11
12%
22-23
27
29%
24-26
38
40%
27-30
14
15%
30+
4
4%
 
Total votes: 94

Anna_Donovan_WUSTL
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 6:55 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Anna_Donovan_WUSTL » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:52 pm

After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:53 pm

Anna_Donovan_WUSTL wrote:After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!


If I tell you my name and fess up, will you just give me a full ride?

User avatar
Lebrarian_Booker
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Lebrarian_Booker » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:54 pm

Anna_Donovan_WUSTL wrote:After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!


Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen! I'll be here all cycle :lol: :lol: :lol:

Edit: In case attax isn't trolling (as I feel somewhat bad) LeBrarian_Booker=Anna_Donovan_WUSTL

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:56 pm

Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
Anna_Donovan_WUSTL wrote:After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!


Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen! I'll be here all cycle :lol: :lol: :lol:

Edit: In case attax isn't trolling (as I feel somewhat bad) LeBrarian_Booker=Anna_Donovan_WUSTL


I was trolling haha, but delinked my LSN, softs, and GPA just in the slight off chance I was wrong :P

User avatar
Fiero85
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Fiero85 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:56 pm

Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
Anna_Donovan_WUSTL wrote:After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!


Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen! I'll be here all cycle :lol: :lol: :lol:


:x You...killed off Ms. Anna...you bastard!

:wink:

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:57 pm

Fiero85 wrote:
Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
Anna_Donovan_WUSTL wrote:After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!


Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen! I'll be here all cycle :lol: :lol: :lol:


:x You...killed off Ms. Anna...you bastard!

:wink:


We got at least 2 solid pages of fun out of that though. 180 LEb, 180.

User avatar
Fiero85
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Fiero85 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:58 pm

Attax wrote:
Fiero85 wrote:
Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
Anna_Donovan_WUSTL wrote:After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!


Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen! I'll be here all cycle :lol: :lol: :lol:


:x You...killed off Ms. Anna...you bastard!

:wink:


We got at least 2 solid pages of fun out of that though. 180 LEb, 180.


+1 many times over

User avatar
cron1834
Posts: 1921
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby cron1834 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:59 pm

The maturity level has really dropped, and the creepiness factor has really taken off, in this thread :shock:

Step your game up, bros. Is this a K-JD thing? This was by far the chillest apps thread of the dozen or so I'm monitoring for a while there ...

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:59 pm

Fiero85 wrote:
Attax wrote:
Fiero85 wrote:
Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen! I'll be here all cycle :lol: :lol: :lol:


:x You...killed off Ms. Anna...you bastard!

:wink:


We got at least 2 solid pages of fun out of that though. 180 LEb, 180.


+1 many times over


#noregrets


we can use hashtags now. Right guys? Please please please

User avatar
Lebrarian_Booker
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Lebrarian_Booker » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:02 pm

cron1834 wrote:The maturity level has really dropped, and the creepiness factor has really taken off, in this thread :shock:

Step your game up, bros. Is this a K-JD thing? This was by far the chillest apps thread of the dozen or so I'm monitoring for a while there ...


Well, 2 years out of UG actually with 2 years professional WE...maturity...one does not simply become mature :)

also, yes very much #noregrets

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:03 pm

Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
cron1834 wrote:The maturity level has really dropped, and the creepiness factor has really taken off, in this thread :shock:

Step your game up, bros. Is this a K-JD thing? This was by far the chillest apps thread of the dozen or so I'm monitoring for a while there ...


Well, 2 years out of UG actually with 2 years professional WE...maturity...one does not simply become mature :)

also, yes very much #noregrets


KJD here who owns his own business dealing with professional people (yes trying to stay ambiguous on purpose). My maturity level doesn't have to stop me from having a little trolling fun.

User avatar
Lebrarian_Booker
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Lebrarian_Booker » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:04 pm

Attax wrote:
Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
cron1834 wrote:The maturity level has really dropped, and the creepiness factor has really taken off, in this thread :shock:

Step your game up, bros. Is this a K-JD thing? This was by far the chillest apps thread of the dozen or so I'm monitoring for a while there ...


Well, 2 years out of UG actually with 2 years professional WE...maturity...one does not simply become mature :)

also, yes very much #noregrets


KJD here who owns his own business dealing with professional people (yes trying to stay ambiguous on purpose). My maturity level doesn't have to stop me from having a little trolling fun.



"dealing with professional people" = working with clients in a business relationship
"dealing with professional people" = hitman

hmmm....yes, certainly ambiguous

lol ;)
Last edited by Lebrarian_Booker on Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:05 pm

Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
Attax wrote:
Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
cron1834 wrote:The maturity level has really dropped, and the creepiness factor has really taken off, in this thread :shock:

Step your game up, bros. Is this a K-JD thing? This was by far the chillest apps thread of the dozen or so I'm monitoring for a while there ...


Well, 2 years out of UG actually with 2 years professional WE...maturity...one does not simply become mature :)

also, yes very much #noregrets


KJD here who owns his own business dealing with professional people (yes trying to stay ambiguous on purpose). My maturity level doesn't have to stop me from having a little trolling fun.



"dealing with professional people" = working with clients in a business relationship
"dealing with professional people" = hitman

hmmm....yes, certainly ambiguous

lol ;)


Both would probably be good enough for acceptance!

1. Oh, he has good professional experience. This is really good!
2. Welp, better admit him so he doesn't kill us.

User avatar
Lebrarian_Booker
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Lebrarian_Booker » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:07 pm

can't argue with that logic

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:08 pm

I've obviously had this scenario planned out for years!

User avatar
Fiero85
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Fiero85 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:08 pm

cron1834 wrote:The maturity level has really dropped, and the creepiness factor has really taken off, in this thread :shock:

Step your game up, bros. Is this a K-JD thing? This was by far the chillest apps thread of the dozen or so I'm monitoring for a while there ...


Hmm Cron may have a point bros. I for one despise losing any chill points for any reason at any time.

So now that we've had a little fun to spice up a "blah" Monday: let the chill-session of this thread re-commence here and now...

(I'm by no means the boss so don't feel obliged to actually stop trolling. The Mods and Ms. Anne_Donovan make the calls around here :wink: )

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 1303
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby yossarian » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:10 pm

JustHawkin wrote:This is why we can't have nice things.


+1

User avatar
Fiero85
Posts: 1910
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Fiero85 » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:10 pm

Too lazy to quote but lolz to those last few posts above about maturity and the "hitman applicant dilemma" :lol:

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:11 pm

Fiero85 wrote:
cron1834 wrote:The maturity level has really dropped, and the creepiness factor has really taken off, in this thread :shock:

Step your game up, bros. Is this a K-JD thing? This was by far the chillest apps thread of the dozen or so I'm monitoring for a while there ...


Hmm Cron may have a point bros. I for one despise losing any chill points for any reason at any time.

So now that we've had a little fun to spice up a "blah" Monday: let the chill-session of this thread re-commence here and now...

(I'm by no means the boss so don't feel obliged to actually stop trolling. The Mods and Ms. Anne_Donovan make the calls around here :wink: )


I still don't think it is that bad. I mean yeah we googled her name, saw a linkedin at the top result and got a picture. That isn't really anything bad. And then obvious troll was obvious and we played along? Seemed like fairly chill to me but then again I didn't score 180 so my logic obv isn't perf. But I don't feel as if the trolling went on too long or too far. Leb outed pretty soon, but we got some laughs out of it (or at least I did). I didn't feel out of line, but eh may have been in which case I would apologize.

That being said, new poll: is attax a hitman or not a hitman?

User avatar
JustHawkin
Posts: 1754
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby JustHawkin » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:13 pm

yossarian71 wrote:
JustHawkin wrote:This is why we can't have nice things.


+1

Thank you for acknowledging the most coherent post ITT today!

:lol:

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22892
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:20 pm

Lebrarian_Booker wrote:
Anna_Donovan_WUSTL wrote:After further review of the activity in this forum, I think it come's as no surprise to many of you that we find it inappropriate to say the least.

In response: If you're an identifiable TLSer and you've already received your scholarship, we will be rescinding it. If you're an identifiable TLSer and have not received a scholarship, we will not be considering you for one.

What will we do with all this extra money? Why, give it to LeBrarian_Booker of course!


Thank you, thank you ladies and gentlemen! I'll be here all cycle :lol: :lol: :lol:

Edit: In case attax isn't trolling (as I feel somewhat bad) LeBrarian_Booker=Anna_Donovan_WUSTL

I will be the official party pooper: Dude, no trolling in the on-topics/alting. See you in a little while.

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 1303
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby yossarian » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:20 pm

Attax wrote:I still don't think it is that bad. I mean yeah we googled her name, saw a linkedin at the top result and got a picture. That isn't really anything bad. And then obvious troll was obvious and we played along? Seemed like fairly chill to me but then again I didn't score 180 so my logic obv isn't perf. But I don't feel as if the trolling went on too long or too far. Leb outed pretty soon, but we got some laughs out of it (or at least I did). I didn't feel out of line, but eh may have been in which case I would apologize.

That being said, new poll: is attax a hitman or not a hitman?


Well, yeah, that's bad. I know other nice things were said, so it wasn't exactly reducing her to her attractiveness, but she did not put her picture on her linked in for TLSers to ogle or make jokes. Commenting on someone's attractiveness, especially in a public forum, is a breach of socio-sexual contract. Just like kissing or hand-holding, there needs to be permission. It is a part of the sexual self that must be given, not taken. In fact, in some cases, it is enough to constitute sexual harassment.

Now look, you guys are my favorite, and I'm not trying to be a jerk. But, yes, yes, that was wrong.

User avatar
ManoftheHour
Posts: 3403
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby ManoftheHour » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:21 pm

A. Nony Mouse wrote:I will be the official party pooper: Dude, no trolling in the on-topics/alting. See you in a little while.


Does this mean he is banned?

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby Attax » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:24 pm

yossarian71 wrote:
Well, yeah, that's bad. I know other nice things were said, so it wasn't exactly reducing her to her attractiveness, but she did not put her picture on her linked in for TLSers to ogle or make jokes. Commenting on someone's attractiveness, especially in a public forum, is a breach of socio-sexual contract. Just like kissing or hand-holding, there needs to be permission. It is a part of the sexual self that must be given, not taken. In fact, in some cases, it is enough to constitute sexual harassment.

Now look, you guys are my favorite, and I'm not trying to be a jerk. But, yes, yes, that was wrong.


Oh no not a jerk, actually a good analysis and perspective. I guess so, someone did post her picture without her consent which should be respected (and I searched too, just didn't find it). But, I do think that a reasonable person would look at the thread after that point and see the rest was obviously trolling on both my end and Leb's end which may result in a temp ban for me as well. Oh well, gotta earn my stripes.

User avatar
ManoftheHour
Posts: 3403
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)

Postby ManoftheHour » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:26 pm

yossarian71 wrote:
Attax wrote:I still don't think it is that bad. I mean yeah we googled her name, saw a linkedin at the top result and got a picture. That isn't really anything bad. And then obvious troll was obvious and we played along? Seemed like fairly chill to me but then again I didn't score 180 so my logic obv isn't perf. But I don't feel as if the trolling went on too long or too far. Leb outed pretty soon, but we got some laughs out of it (or at least I did). I didn't feel out of line, but eh may have been in which case I would apologize.

That being said, new poll: is attax a hitman or not a hitman?


Well, yeah, that's bad. I know other nice things were said, so it wasn't exactly reducing her to her attractiveness, but she did not put her picture on her linked in for TLSers to ogle or make jokes. Commenting on someone's attractiveness, especially in a public forum, is a breach of socio-sexual contract. Just like kissing or hand-holding, there needs to be permission. It is a part of the sexual self that must be given, not taken. In fact, in some cases, it is enough to constitute sexual harassment.

Now look, you guys are my favorite, and I'm not trying to be a jerk. But, yes, yes, that was wrong.


I actually agree with this which is why although I partook in joking around, I did not quote the picture.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], nathjf, whodareswins, Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests