WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
We are 18, go bears.
- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Would Spivey lie to us? I think not.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
It can't be official yet because the rankings aren't released to the public until tomorrow.
- isuperserial
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:49 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
- rion91
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Wow kudos to WUSTL! Looks like Tamanaha is working some magic
- ms9
- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chuckbass
- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Thanks for the clarification Spivey! And damn that two way tie at 146 is rough...MikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
- bound
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
MikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 6:54 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
wow great news. WUSTL on the up and up.
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Get on your twitter grind and follow Spivey.Austinbound wrote: That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?
- bound
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
JustHawkin wrote:Get on your twitter grind and follow Spivey.Austinbound wrote: That's awesome! I'm assuming the rest will be released with tomorrow's official March 11 release date?
Lol the rest still aren't posted on twitter.
- CookieDough
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Congrats to WUSTL on the rise, this is exciting news for the school!MikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CookieDough
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
- wittyhandle
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
CookieDough wrote:Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
- Ricky-Bobby
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.wittyhandle wrote:CookieDough wrote:Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.CookieDough wrote:This changes everything!
No but seriously if I worked at USC I'd be scared.
Boom. I win.
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
BahahahaRicky-Bobby wrote:It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.wittyhandle wrote:CookieDough wrote: Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
T-147 4lyfeMikeSpivey wrote:Yea I promise these are accurate as I actually have them in hand. For example, there is a two way tie at 146 between South Texas and Pacific (McGeorge). I don't think I could even make that up.isuperserial wrote:I trust Spivey. I mean, he's been wrong about some things in the past, but I honestly don't think he would post something this huge unless it was legit.peachesthedoge wrote:cusenation wrote:http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/usnwr- ... -rankings/
We're #18 now. Someone at USC is gonna get fired this week.
wait is this official??
I was like 0 for 37 on that LSAT release data but I did keep prefacing it "I don't know...I am just hearing this from this person or that person." There's no preface here, I would never throw these up on my website if I wasn't absolutely sure of them.
Long way of saying congrats WUSTL. This is real!
- CookieDough
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
fairRicky-Bobby wrote:It's only that warm because half the year the state is on fire.wittyhandle wrote:CookieDough wrote:Yeah it's actually been terrible here since I got back, so I won't argue. This time. Traffic everywhere and it was 75 degrees at 11pm yesterday... Gross.Ricky-Bobby wrote:
Just goes to show that California is awful and no one should ever live there.
Boom. I win.
- BlackCanary
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:39 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
- Ditka747
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:02 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lebrarian_Booker
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
As someone who lives in Minnesota I can confirmBlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
- yossarian
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
These are now available at every major suburb of every t50 metro in the nation. The Californians have won.Ditka747 wrote:Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
You. I like you.Ditka747 wrote:Too many luxurious dog hotels for this statement to be true.BlackCanary wrote:You guys are just jealous. California is easily the best state in the union.
- nickpapagiorgio
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:05 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Has anyone interviewed with Will Fruhwirth? The web site lists him as an admissions coordinator. I have an interview scheduled with this fellow for tomorrow.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login