Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:34 pm
In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=213970
Congrats!bloomingtea wrote:In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.
Thanks ! Are you waiting?Moltenmama wrote:Congrats!bloomingtea wrote:In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.
Yes. Impatiently. So much movement lately and still I wait.bloomingtea wrote:Thanks ! Are you waiting?Moltenmama wrote:Congrats!bloomingtea wrote:In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.
It was 164, I saw it on their aba report on their website. I think they'll probably try to raise it for US News purposes. I wonder how many full rides they see giving out this year.gitguy wrote:What is everyone here assuming to be the median? 2013 matriculants were 75th: 166 and 25th: 162 with no median disclosed.
I actually have a hunch that the median last year was 164. Can anyone debunk that?
Comforting. On a side note, this thread is really quiet this year compared to last.BentleyLittle wrote:It was 164, I saw it on their aba report on their website. I think they'll probably try to raise it for US News purposes. I wonder how many full rides they see giving out this year.gitguy wrote:What is everyone here assuming to be the median? 2013 matriculants were 75th: 166 and 25th: 162 with no median disclosed.
I actually have a hunch that the median last year was 164. Can anyone debunk that?
Agreed. My first cycle was 11-12 and I remember TT schools that had over 20 pages at this point.gitguy wrote:Comforting. On a side note, this thread is really quiet this year compared to last.BentleyLittle wrote:It was 164, I saw it on their aba report on their website. I think they'll probably try to raise it for US News purposes. I wonder how many full rides they see giving out this year.gitguy wrote:What is everyone here assuming to be the median? 2013 matriculants were 75th: 166 and 25th: 162 with no median disclosed.
I actually have a hunch that the median last year was 164. Can anyone debunk that?
If you don't mind me asking, when did you apply?Ally Mcbeal wrote:IN via email!!! Below 25th LSAT 3.6 GPA
Congrats! What took you so longManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Applied late. Literally my last app.kobe1020 wrote:Congrats! What took you so longManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
I submitted my last app this MondayManoftheHour wrote:Applied late. Literally my last app.kobe1020 wrote:Congrats! What took you so longManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Correct.Aequitas_ wrote:Checking in. From what I understand there is no status checker, correct?
Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
I think you're confusing me with Dr. Dre, lol.gitguy wrote:Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?
Must have been a good scholly package to eat those comments.
We all look alike.ManoftheHour wrote:I think you're confusing me with Dr. Dre, lol.gitguy wrote:Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?
Must have been a good scholly package to eat those comments.
UCH is pretty TTTT though. I think UCI/UCD >>>>> UCH
I'd be a fool not to consider all options.
Nah man, PI or bust.
Brettanomyces wrote:We all look alike.ManoftheHour wrote:I think you're confusing me with Dr. Dre, lol.gitguy wrote:Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?
Must have been a good scholly package to eat those comments.
UCH is pretty TTTT though. I think UCI/UCD >>>>> UCH
I'd be a fool not to consider all options.
Nah man, PI or bust.
Wtf. I don't remember saying any of that. Our tars do not even look the same...gitguy wrote: Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?
I say it's a bad idea. LOCI is for WLs. You haven't been accepted yet but you also haven't been dinged. You're still alive!bcoco9292 wrote:Would sending a LOCI be a bad idea if I have not heard back yet...went complete beginning of November.