Page 8 of 18

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:34 pm
by bloomingtea
In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:50 pm
by Moltenmama
bloomingtea wrote:In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.
Congrats!

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:35 pm
by cpslo12
Accepted via email! Complete 11/20. Big splitter, feel free to PM for numbers.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:38 pm
by Ally Mcbeal
IN via email!!! Below 25th LSAT 3.6 GPA

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:02 pm
by bloomingtea
Moltenmama wrote:
bloomingtea wrote:In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.
Congrats!
Thanks :)! Are you waiting?

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:08 pm
by Moltenmama
bloomingtea wrote:
Moltenmama wrote:
bloomingtea wrote:In via email. At one median, other stat is above median. Submitted late December. No scholarship info yet.
Congrats!
Thanks :)! Are you waiting?
Yes. Impatiently. So much movement lately and still I wait. :(

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 6:12 pm
by gitguy
What is everyone here assuming to be the median? 2013 matriculants were 75th: 166 and 25th: 162 with no median disclosed.

I actually have a hunch that the median last year was 164. Can anyone debunk that?

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 6:39 pm
by BentleyLittle
gitguy wrote:What is everyone here assuming to be the median? 2013 matriculants were 75th: 166 and 25th: 162 with no median disclosed.

I actually have a hunch that the median last year was 164. Can anyone debunk that?
It was 164, I saw it on their aba report on their website. I think they'll probably try to raise it for US News purposes. I wonder how many full rides they see giving out this year.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:24 pm
by gitguy
BentleyLittle wrote:
gitguy wrote:What is everyone here assuming to be the median? 2013 matriculants were 75th: 166 and 25th: 162 with no median disclosed.

I actually have a hunch that the median last year was 164. Can anyone debunk that?
It was 164, I saw it on their aba report on their website. I think they'll probably try to raise it for US News purposes. I wonder how many full rides they see giving out this year.
Comforting. On a side note, this thread is really quiet this year compared to last.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:31 pm
by BentleyLittle
gitguy wrote:
BentleyLittle wrote:
gitguy wrote:What is everyone here assuming to be the median? 2013 matriculants were 75th: 166 and 25th: 162 with no median disclosed.

I actually have a hunch that the median last year was 164. Can anyone debunk that?
It was 164, I saw it on their aba report on their website. I think they'll probably try to raise it for US News purposes. I wonder how many full rides they see giving out this year.
Comforting. On a side note, this thread is really quiet this year compared to last.
Agreed. My first cycle was 11-12 and I remember TT schools that had over 20 pages at this point.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2014 10:54 pm
by bcoco9292
Ally Mcbeal wrote:IN via email!!! Below 25th LSAT 3.6 GPA
If you don't mind me asking, when did you apply?

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:48 am
by ManoftheHour
In via email!

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 1:20 am
by kobe1020
ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Congrats! What took you so long :D

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:27 am
by ManoftheHour
kobe1020 wrote:
ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Congrats! What took you so long :D
Applied late. Literally my last app.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 2:29 am
by kobe1020
ManoftheHour wrote:
kobe1020 wrote:
ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Congrats! What took you so long :D
Applied late. Literally my last app.
I submitted my last app this Monday

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 4:46 am
by Aequitas_
Checking in. From what I understand there is no status checker, correct?

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:29 am
by ohhdear
Aequitas_ wrote:Checking in. From what I understand there is no status checker, correct?
Correct.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:29 pm
by logicspeaks
Checking in! UCI will be my top choice with enough $. Good luck to everyone just checking in as well.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:36 pm
by gitguy
ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.

Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?

Must have been a good scholly package to eat those comments.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 12:32 am
by ManoftheHour
gitguy wrote:
ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.

Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?

Must have been a good scholly package to eat those comments.
I think you're confusing me with Dr. Dre, lol.

UCH is pretty TTTT though. I think UCI/UCD >>>>> UCH

I'd be a fool not to consider all options. :D

Nah man, PI or bust.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 12:50 am
by Brettanomyces
ManoftheHour wrote:
gitguy wrote:
ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.

Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?

Must have been a good scholly package to eat those comments.
I think you're confusing me with Dr. Dre, lol.

UCH is pretty TTTT though. I think UCI/UCD >>>>> UCH

I'd be a fool not to consider all options. :D

Nah man, PI or bust.
We all look alike.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 12:59 am
by ManoftheHour
Brettanomyces wrote:
ManoftheHour wrote:
gitguy wrote:
ManoftheHour wrote:In via email!
Hold the phones. I thought you were mulling over whether UCH or UCI were more TTT/TTTT.

Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?

Must have been a good scholly package to eat those comments.
I think you're confusing me with Dr. Dre, lol.

UCH is pretty TTTT though. I think UCI/UCD >>>>> UCH

I'd be a fool not to consider all options. :D

Nah man, PI or bust.
We all look alike.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Gitguy, I think this is your man:

http://top-law-schools.com/forums/membe ... e&u=109743
gitguy wrote: Ready to give in, attend UCI, and "represent the same rich/middle class/government/corporate people as everyone else" and "add another graduate to an already saturated market."?
Wtf. I don't remember saying any of that. Our tars do not even look the same...

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 4:06 pm
by bcoco9292
Would sending a LOCI be a bad idea if I have not heard back yet...went complete beginning of November.

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 4:49 pm
by kirbyb
bcoco9292 wrote:Would sending a LOCI be a bad idea if I have not heard back yet...went complete beginning of November.
I say it's a bad idea. LOCI is for WLs. You haven't been accepted yet but you also haven't been dinged. You're still alive!

Re: UC Irvine c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)

Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2014 4:57 pm
by BentleyLittle
I'll trade someone 9k at WUSTL for some more Irvine $$