Nonconsecutive wrote:hill wrote:in
3.9/175, no $$, bad sign?
Congrats on the acceptance!
Perhaps someone more familiar with CLS' tactics can elaborate, but I have no clue why there was no $ at all for you.
Yeah, that is odd, maybe it'll come later? My understanding was that the schollies were typically to candidates that would likely be taking HYS otherwise, and with those numbers I would think you'd at least cop one of those? Do you have any negative softs? Are you KJD?