Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Have you been admitted?

Yes
76
21%
No
288
79%
 
Total votes: 364

User avatar
fleurdelis2
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:22 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby fleurdelis2 » Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:18 pm

.
Last edited by fleurdelis2 on Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Scvaz7
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Scvaz7 » Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:23 pm

fleurdelis2 wrote:thoughts that have gone through my head as this cycle wears on:
- I want to move to California
- I wonder what's taking them so long
- Maybe the adcomms have outed me on TLS/LSN
- I must have said something dumb online
- I should have retaken my LSAT. REGRETS.


Never regret! Stay positive! :)

User avatar
lastsamurai
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby lastsamurai » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:35 am

fleurdelis2 wrote:thoughts that have gone through my head as this cycle wears on:
- I want to move to California
- I wonder what's taking them so long
- Maybe the adcomms have outed me on TLS/LSN
- I must have said something dumb online
- I should have retaken my LSAT. REGRETS.


You have 53 posts and you're worried about them outing you?

User avatar
Chalupa-Batman
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Chalupa-Batman » Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:29 am

lastsamurai wrote:
fleurdelis2 wrote:thoughts that have gone through my head as this cycle wears on:
- I want to move to California
- I wonder what's taking them so long
- Maybe the adcomms have outed me on TLS/LSN
- I must have said something dumb online
- I should have retaken my LSAT. REGRETS.


You have 53 posts and you're worried about them outing you?

Is outing on tls really a thing, even if you have 3000 posts? Would they put a note in your file saying that the candidate refreshed her/his status checker 26000 times and admitted to making a pact with Satan to gain admission?

Surely they have better things to do with their time, like maybe sending us decisions.

paperrev
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby paperrev » Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:21 am

So my mother, who is probably as anxious as I am, actually asked me if it were a bad idea to just email the admissions office and ask for a date for decisions. At the time, I said, prob not a good idea, but in my present state, it is sounding better and better...

User avatar
fleurdelis2
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:22 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby fleurdelis2 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:37 am

.
Last edited by fleurdelis2 on Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:10 am

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
andapieceoftoast
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby andapieceoftoast » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:29 am

muzzy wrote:
paperrev wrote:So my mother, who is probably as anxious as I am, actually asked me if it were a bad idea to just email the admissions office and ask for a date for decisions. At the time, I said, prob not a good idea, but in my present state, it is sounding better and better...
By all means, you should bug them. If I had to guess, though, they'll probably toe the line and say that they will render all decisions by the end of April.


I don't know if I would send an email. I'm sure they're going as fast as they can. It sucks, but honestly, I don't think sending them an email is going to get you your results faster and in theory could end up negatively affecting your chances. I'm not saying that I think it would negatively affect your chances, I'm just saying that it might. You've waited this long, might as well tough it out for another 2 weeks.
If you have something to add to your app though, you could probably parlay that into a question about timing.

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby koalacity » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:53 am

¿ someday ?

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby barrelofmonkeys » Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:58 am

koalacity wrote:¿ someday ?


hi koala

it is almost 9AM in palo alto

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby koalacity » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:13 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
koalacity wrote:¿ someday ?


hi koala

it is almost 9AM in palo alto

It's 9:15 AM. Do you know where our applications are?

User avatar
Chalupa-Batman
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Chalupa-Batman » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:15 pm

koalacity wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote:
koalacity wrote:¿ someday ?


hi koala

it is almost 9AM in palo alto

It's 9:15 AM. Do you know where our applications are?

Submitted for review, that's where.

User avatar
neprep
Posts: 1066
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby neprep » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:22 pm

koalacity wrote:¿ someday ?


It's okay, SLS. Don't let Koala dragoon you.

Image

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:52 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
wealtheow
Posts: 1034
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:45 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby wealtheow » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:57 pm

:(

User avatar
Typhoon24
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:09 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Typhoon24 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:57 pm

samford law email T_T

User avatar
NicCageOnline
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:36 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby NicCageOnline » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:58 pm

Typhoon24 wrote:samford law email T_T


+1 Dammit

92653
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby 92653 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:48 pm

Fwiw, there are about 230 in the 2017 Facebook group right now. I thought Stanford admitted closer to 400. Considering they have under 50% yield, maybe they're always super cautious and then take a huge chunk off of the waitlist. Either that, or rest assured they still have many more admissions left to make. Good luck folks :)

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:53 pm

92653 wrote:Fwiw, there are about 230 in the 2017 Facebook group right now. I thought Stanford admitted closer to 400. Considering they have under 50% yield, maybe they're always super cautious and then take a huge chunk off of the waitlist. Either that, or rest assured they still have many more admissions left to make. Good luck folks :)



this is from the LSN WL data thread:

Stanford: 10.8% (148 applicants on LSN did not withdraw from the waitlist, 16 eventually admitted)

So I don't think that's the case, also it would be best to compare the Facebook group to past FB group numbers instead of total admits, but I don't have those numbers

sorry to kill dreams lol

92653
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby 92653 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:56 pm

james.bungles wrote:
92653 wrote:Fwiw, there are about 230 in the 2017 Facebook group right now. I thought Stanford admitted closer to 400. Considering they have under 50% yield, maybe they're always super cautious and then take a huge chunk off of the waitlist. Either that, or rest assured they still have many more admissions left to make. Good luck folks :)



this is from the LSN WL data thread:

Stanford: 10.8% (148 applicants on LSN did not withdraw from the waitlist, 16 eventually admitted)

So I don't think that's the case, also it would be best to compare the Facebook group to past FB group numbers instead of total admits, but I don't have those numbers

sorry to kill dreams lol


Lol I'm not good with numbers, hence law school. But it could always be different this year!

User avatar
SordidLSATHistory
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby SordidLSATHistory » Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:59 pm

92653 wrote:Fwiw, there are about 230 in the 2017 Facebook group right now. I thought Stanford admitted closer to 400. Considering they have under 50% yield, maybe they're always super cautious and then take a huge chunk off of the waitlist. Either that, or rest assured they still have many more admissions left to make. Good luck folks :)


In that case, sounds like they could use all 150 of us :D !

The second half of the admit list probably just fell behind Faye's desk or something.

(Here's hoping... :cry: )

User avatar
rseaney
Posts: 393
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:53 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby rseaney » Mon Apr 14, 2014 2:36 pm

NicCageOnline wrote:
Typhoon24 wrote:samford law email T_T


+1 Dammit


hey #6 trial advocacy program doee ;)

baconwrapped
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:30 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby baconwrapped » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:35 pm


User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby koalacity » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:36 pm

baconwrapped wrote:Waitlist reported on LSN: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Yazzthelawyer

Came here to post this, haha.

Also, :shock:

baconwrapped
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:30 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby baconwrapped » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:41 pm

The lack of dates is killing me. It must have been today if it's accurate, right? :?: :| I don't know why I even speculate at this point but for the sake of consistency.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: applicationquestions, BobBoblaw, Keilz, mt77777, premalone, proteinshake, Tazewell and 16 guests