Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Have you been admitted?

Yes
76
21%
No
288
79%
 
Total votes: 364

BillsFan9907
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby BillsFan9907 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:46 am

Sorry guys lack of sleep. You guys are just tooling on it bring the same status for so long?

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:50 am

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

love4life29
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:51 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby love4life29 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:57 am

gottago wrote:Did somebody publish the LSN stats of how many people get S, given that they got H/Y/both?


I don't think so. But I would be realllllllly shocked if someone got H and Y and not S.

User avatar
EquallyWrong
Posts: 3213
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby EquallyWrong » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:03 pm

muzzy wrote:
EquallyWrong wrote:
muzzy wrote:
EquallyWrong wrote:c'mon Stanford, where is the catharsis?
it's a wait list, of course,...or worse!
let's not be simple, this is an increasingly bad omen...
but I can't help holding on to an impossible expectation.
eck, who needs your Eden like environs and chummy entrepreneurial ubermenschen.
(to be recited with bitterness and clothing disheveled after a night of carousing: shirts half tucked and hair half mussed while a chorus of affluent and well groomed princes of the Ivy League types shake their heads in pitying disapproval)
Act II: Miraculous Acceptance featuring Stanford Dean of Admissions making congratulatory phone call in contralto to high soprano, followed by ballad in which applicant begs for continuing financial aid.
This is your LOCI, right? I think this will sew things up nicely.

I don't think so, not without the climatic third act: dance of the SCOTUS clerkship.
Obviously S should break new ground and offer dance interviews.

the bigger hurdle is that it's written to be performed entirely in the nude. we're going for a tone of hardcore Stravinsky inspired, in part, by the tradition of the whirling dervish. some scenes the Lord Chamberlain would be unlikely to approve of, to say the least...but sure, Stanford likes its rabble rousers and radicals.

NapoleonXV
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby NapoleonXV » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:18 pm

love4life29 wrote:
gottago wrote:Did somebody publish the LSN stats of how many people get S, given that they got H/Y/both?


I don't think so. But I would be realllllllly shocked if someone got H and Y and not S.


I got H and Y, but my S has been submitted for review since mid Sept T T

gottago
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby gottago » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:26 pm

edit
Last edited by gottago on Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:29 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lastsamurai
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2013 11:17 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby lastsamurai » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:32 pm

gottago wrote:
NapoleonXV wrote:
love4life29 wrote:
gottago wrote:Did somebody publish the LSN stats of how many people get S, given that they got H/Y/both?


I don't think so. But I would be realllllllly shocked if someone got H and Y and not S.


I got H and Y, but my S has been submitted for review since mid Sept T T


lol yep. been sitting on S forever, even though HY both came back in ~30 days. but I remember someone did an analysis of how many sweep, how many get HY but not S, HS but not Y, etc.


It's out there somewhere, but dude (or dudette), just go to Y

User avatar
bhs12
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby bhs12 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:33 pm

NapoleonXV wrote:
love4life29 wrote:
gottago wrote:Did somebody publish the LSN stats of how many people get S, given that they got H/Y/both?


I don't think so. But I would be realllllllly shocked if someone got H and Y and not S.


I got H and Y, but my S has been submitted for review since mid Sept T T


I got Yale and Stanford, but not Harvard-- not even an interview. I have a pretty strong guess as to why this is, but I imagine this is the least common 2 of 3 configuration.

User avatar
aboutmydaylight
Posts: 580
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby aboutmydaylight » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:33 pm

I'd imagine most Y --> H but just numerically looking at the acceptance/matriculation numbers the other groups probably don't overlap as much as people think.

User avatar
drawstring
Posts: 1933
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby drawstring » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:35 pm

All I remember from those figures is that 80 percent who got YLS got HLS, and 67 percent who got SLS got HLS.

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:37 pm

love4life29 wrote:
gottago wrote:Did somebody publish the LSN stats of how many people get S, given that they got H/Y/both?


I don't think so. But I would be realllllllly shocked if someone got H and Y and not S.


well you better hurry up and withdraw and go to Y

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:38 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
drawstring
Posts: 1933
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby drawstring » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:38 pm

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=214093&start=1000

vzapana wrote:
i did this for the harvard thread, but i think this thread would enjoy this information too

data dump, using LSN figures from three application cycles (2009-2012):

464 H admits
114 Y admits
182 S admits
Total: 760 offers

CROSS-ADMITS = 166 total (receiving 382 offers)
50 HYS
3 YS, no H
71 HS, no Y
42 HY, no S

50, or 9.2%, of the admits are offered admission to all three.
116, or 21.3%, of the admits are offered admission to two of the schools.
378, or 69.5%, of the admits are offered admission to only one of the schools. (Of these, 301 were offered admission to Harvard, 58 to Stanford and 19 to Yale, according to my calculations.)

20% of Harvard admits get into Yale
26% of Harvard admits gets into Stanford

47% of Yale admits get into Stanford
81% of Yale admits get into Harvard

29% of Stanford admits get into Yale
67% of Stanford admits get into Harvard

User avatar
drawstring
Posts: 1933
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby drawstring » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:40 pm

So bhs is very rare indeed.

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:40 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bhs12
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby bhs12 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:45 pm

drawstring wrote:So bhs is very rare indeed.


very "special" (wouldn't be the first time I've heard that).

User avatar
aboutmydaylight
Posts: 580
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby aboutmydaylight » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:45 pm

muzzy wrote:
drawstring wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=214093&start=1000

vzapana wrote:
i did this for the harvard thread, but i think this thread would enjoy this information too

data dump, using LSN figures from three application cycles (2009-2012):

464 H admits
114 Y admits
182 S admits
Total: 760 offers

CROSS-ADMITS = 166 total (receiving 382 offers)
50 HYS
3 YS, no H
71 HS, no Y
42 HY, no S

50, or 9.2%, of the admits are offered admission to all three.
116, or 21.3%, of the admits are offered admission to two of the schools.
378, or 69.5%, of the admits are offered admission to only one of the schools. (Of these, 301 were offered admission to Harvard, 58 to Stanford and 19 to Yale, according to my calculations.)

20% of Harvard admits get into Yale
26% of Harvard admits gets into Stanford

47% of Yale admits get into Stanford
81% of Yale admits get into Harvard

29% of Stanford admits get into Yale
67% of Stanford admits get into Harvard
Thanks, draw.

Anyone else surprised by bolded?


Not all that surprised though it does seem a little low. Also, I don't know how user calculated these figures but I'd imagine a lot of these people aren't even applying to YS at all just out of self selection (or is the data only for people who APPLIED to all 3?). That would boost YS relative to H. For example I got HS but didn't apply to Y. How does my data point look in that analysis?

gottago
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby gottago » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:47 pm

edit
Last edited by gottago on Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
wtrc
Posts: 2057
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby wtrc » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:50 pm

gottago wrote:
drawstring wrote:[url]


data dump, using LSN figures from three application cycles (2009-2012):

464 H admits
114 Y admits
182 S admits
Total: 760 offers



This is interesting as well.... four years of data on LSN nets only 114 Yale admits; 464 H admits? Assuming H consistently lets in 850 per year; and Y is 235 or so per year.... that means LSN only accounts for 15% or so of admits.

Does that mean every time an LSN acceptance is reported.. on average there are 6 or 7 not reported there? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby koalacity » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:50 pm

gottago wrote:yea that's what I was looking for. lol fuck. I was hoping that some recent good news would be a leading indicator for S but at least now I'm only slightly worse than a coin-flip whereas before I was only looking at 26%

Would you take S over YH, though?

esther0123
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:40 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby esther0123 » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:51 pm

:cry: I want closure (a good one).... are we just all expecting ding or wl right now? what's going ooon it's Apriillll

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby koalacity » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:52 pm

wtrc wrote:
gottago wrote:
drawstring wrote:[url]


data dump, using LSN figures from three application cycles (2009-2012):

464 H admits
114 Y admits
182 S admits
Total: 760 offers



This is interesting as well.... four years of data on LSN nets only 114 Yale admits; 464 H admits? Assuming H consistently lets in 850 per year; and Y is 235 or so per year.... that means LSN only accounts for 15% or so of admits.

Does that mean every time an LSN acceptance is reported.. on average there are 6 or 7 not reported there? :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

Yeah, ~15% is the figure I've heard before. TLS has notably more admits (and denies) reported than LSN, though-lots of people are too paranoid or too lazy or whatever to actually make/update a LSN account, but will post on TLS.

gottago
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby gottago » Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:54 pm

edit
Last edited by gottago on Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby koalacity » Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:00 pm

gottago wrote:
koalacity wrote:
gottago wrote:yea that's what I was looking for. lol fuck. I was hoping that some recent good news would be a leading indicator for S but at least now I'm only slightly worse than a coin-flip whereas before I was only looking at 26%

Would you take S over YH, though?


As of now probably not but you never know. I guess I won't be admitted in time for ASW (just lol) so I probably won't visit.

I say that because before getting Y I was sure I'd choose HLS even if I got Y, but after getting it I'm not so sure anymore and it's now 50/50. So maybe the same thing will happen with S.

I thought Y would be a moral victory but it's really exerting its pull

Just remember that there are people who would give their kidney and/or first-born children to have the chance to actually go to these schools. Collecting acceptances shouldn't be a thing.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blahblah123, darthlawyer, Lawschool305, Leliana, mm2368, patrickkpaul, Zoe107 and 36 guests