Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Have you been admitted?

Yes
76
21%
No
288
79%
 
Total votes: 364

User avatar
teampeeta
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby teampeeta » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:00 pm

To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.

User avatar
koalacity
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby koalacity » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:03 pm

teampeeta wrote:To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.

Yeah, I'm hoping that moving up the ASW was intentional and that they'll be doing things a bit differently this year to try to boost their yield and/or shore up their medians/class earlier. But I really have no idea.

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:04 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

texasgirl67
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:31 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby texasgirl67 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:05 pm

[quote="muzzy"][quote="teampeeta"]To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.[/quote][img]http://gifrific.gifrific.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ryan-point-agree-the-office.gif[/img]
Optimism. 8)[/quote]

Wow, best one I've seen in awhile. You're my hero

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:11 pm

looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions

User avatar
Dr.Zer0
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Dr.Zer0 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:12 pm

james.bungles wrote:looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions



Actually someone posted a rejection with a 1/27 complete date a couple of pages ago.

User avatar
bhs12
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby bhs12 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:15 pm

[quote="texasgirl67"][quote="muzzy"][quote="teampeeta"]To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.[/quote][img]http://gifrific.gifrific.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/ryan-point-agree-the-office.gif[/img]
Optimism. 8)[/quote]

Wow, best one I've seen in awhile. You're my hero[/quote]





I'll try to do some recon at ASW. FWIW, I think that this scenario seems quite plausible.

User avatar
Chalupa-Batman
Posts: 101
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 5:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Chalupa-Batman » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:17 pm

Dr.Zer0 wrote:
james.bungles wrote:looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions



Actually someone posted a rejection with a 1/27 complete date a couple of pages ago.

Yeah, I'm sure they've sent out some auto-decisions, but I think it's plausible that they're still getting to the later apps that required complete review. I'm complete 1/8 and still waiting for what it's worth.

User avatar
teampeeta
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby teampeeta » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:17 pm

muzzy wrote:
teampeeta wrote:To be fair, the ASW is earlier this year than in previous years. All this talk about straight acceptances being done after today is just conjecture. There could be some acceptances into April- there usually are.
--ImageRemoved--
Optimism. 8)


Lol. I am trying to put my sarcastic self on a shelf and keep hope alive. This week has been rough. We could all use some Stanford love, Faye.

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:19 pm

Dr.Zer0 wrote:
james.bungles wrote:looking on LSN, basically none of the people who applied from ~Jan 10 to whenever their deadline was have heard anything yet, so unless they are planning on WLing everyone who applied late, I'm guessing there will be some more decisions



Actually someone posted a rejection with a 1/27 complete date a couple of pages ago.


true, there are a few rejects for late january completes, but no decisions for Feb completes or the vast majority of Jan applicants

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:20 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
andapieceoftoast
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby andapieceoftoast » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:31 pm

Tried to find a gif I could steal of Leslie Knope saying
"Everybody pants now. Pants, pants, pants, pants"

But I couldn't

(cue someone else who's more tech savvy)

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:38 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
andapieceoftoast
Posts: 439
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby andapieceoftoast » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:49 pm

muzzy wrote:
andapieceoftoast wrote:(cue someone else who's more tech savvy)
Image

Stanford, I'm clearly adept at posting gifs and would be at home in Silicon Valley.


1) Thank you for this.
2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby muzzy » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:58 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bhs12
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby bhs12 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:59 pm

muzzy wrote:
andapieceoftoast wrote:1) Thank you for this.
:wink:
andapieceoftoast wrote:2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.
Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.


+100 for this throwback to middle school French!

User avatar
Brettanomyces
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:08 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Brettanomyces » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:00 pm

muzzy wrote:
andapieceoftoast wrote:1) Thank you for this.
:wink:
andapieceoftoast wrote:2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.
Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.


LUH-VA-LEE!

jjmaple8
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 4:00 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby jjmaple8 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:03 pm

Brettanomyces wrote:
muzzy wrote:
andapieceoftoast wrote:1) Thank you for this.
:wink:
andapieceoftoast wrote:2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.
Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.


LUH-VA-LEE!


Did anyone else watch Téléfrançais with that horribly creepy talking pineapple? That thing gave me the heebie-jeebies.

User avatar
bhs12
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:03 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby bhs12 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:20 pm

jjmaple8 wrote:
Brettanomyces wrote:
muzzy wrote:
andapieceoftoast wrote:1) Thank you for this.
:wink:
andapieceoftoast wrote:2) EVERY time I see a post by you, I think to myself "Bonjouuurrr, je suis le grand Muzzy. Je suis la jeune fille!"
I always wondered why the girl said "I am the young girl"...like she's talking in 3rd person or something.
Muzzy was weird. But he ate clocks and that pretty much makes up for everything.


LUH-VA-LEE!


Did anyone else watch Téléfrançais with that horribly creepy talking pineapple? That thing gave me the heebie-jeebies.


Yeah! It had a beak, as I remember it

User avatar
vuthy
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby vuthy » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:21 pm

Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92

Wiggly
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:19 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Wiggly » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:23 pm

...
Last edited by Wiggly on Sun May 25, 2014 3:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
teampeeta
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby teampeeta » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:25 pm

JSWright101 wrote:
vuthy wrote:Is this a real S waitlist? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/dreday92


I don't think so....152 LSAT WL? He'd have to be an URM and have cured cancer.


No way it's real.

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:29 pm

look at those softs (AA and strong other softs), looks at least plausible, although I haven't heard of Stanford WLing anyone else yet..

kathj06
Posts: 216
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:50 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby kathj06 » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:38 pm

I mean I guess someone could message him but I don't know why someone would make that up, unless it was an accident.

User avatar
Jessasaurus
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Jessasaurus » Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:39 pm

kathj06 wrote:I mean I guess someone could message him but I don't know why someone would make that up, unless it was an accident.


Some people just want to watch the world burn




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ad34964n, christinaxcarrie, jackstraw92, jer0689, laurlaur2112, lawschoolapp1987, smashbash, Thomas Hagan, ESQ., tinafeyclone and 39 guests