Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Have you been admitted?

Yes
76
21%
No
288
79%
 
Total votes: 364

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby barrelofmonkeys » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:34 pm

guys stop feeding trolls c'mon now
eta: was able to get on to status checker, still UR
Last edited by barrelofmonkeys on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chneyo
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby chneyo » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:35 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
vuthy
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby vuthy » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:36 pm

Still just UR, but I'm an early January submit.

User avatar
Slytherpuff
Posts: 2353
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Slytherpuff » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:36 pm

vuthy wrote:Still just UR, but I'm an early January submit.

+1

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:38 pm

cesium wrote:
IrishJew wrote:+1 I hope so! That would be nicer than the nasty letter I got from Harvard's IT department! (Who knew Harvard IT had so many lawyers?!)


Wow. What did the letter say? You don't have to divulge it completely, but what was the gist of the letter?


Ummm, OK. The gist of the letter was that I should stop logging into the status checker 2,000 times a second on four different computers. While it is true the Harvard website has a glitch whereby anyone who checks their status 1,000,009 times will be automatically admitted, they can come after me for damages and are legally entitled to deny my a meal plan should I matriculate.

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:41 pm

cesium wrote:
IrishJew wrote:+1 I hope so! That would be nicer than the nasty letter I got from Harvard's IT department! (Who knew Harvard IT had so many lawyers?!)


Wow. What did the letter say? You don't have to divulge it completely, but what was the gist of the letter?


Oh. While I was examining the letter from Harvard IT's legal team it fell into the fireplace and when I fished it out some glowing words appeared at the bottom! They read:
"PS Be careful when posting jokes on TLS because even though you may think it's obvious that absurd statements are not true it's very hard to convey tone on the internet and some people might take you seriously. One time this guy we knew had a friend or cousin who made jokes on TLS and his gerbil died the same day. If you have posted jokes on TLS, make sure to forward this letter to 5 friends within 24 hours or your gerbil might die too!"
Last edited by IrishJew on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JD1776
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:08 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby JD1776 » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:41 pm

Still UR as well. But with a mid-November complete date, the hammer might be falling soon on my sweet little head.

User avatar
PotenC
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:13 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby PotenC » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:42 pm

Hey guys just in case anyone was interested my friend got that call from Dean Deal this morning. Shout out to him.

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:43 pm

JD1776 wrote:Still UR as well. But with a mid-November complete date, the hammer might be falling soon on my sweet little head.


I am also still UR with early November submit. In the same boat as you, dude.

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby barrelofmonkeys » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:43 pm

PotenC wrote:Hey guys just in case anyone was interested my friend got that call from Dean Deal this morning. Shout out to him.


i will shout him out WHEN YOU PROVIDE HIS STATS/DATES.

congrats potenc's friend :)

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:44 pm

PotenC wrote:Hey guys just in case anyone was interested my friend got that call from Dean Deal this morning. Shout out to him.


Man, dings and admits on the same day. SMH. Vicarious congrats.

User avatar
chicky
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:14 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby chicky » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:44 pm

IrishJew wrote:
cesium wrote:
IrishJew wrote:+1 I hope so! That would be nicer than the nasty letter I got from Harvard's IT department! (Who knew Harvard IT had so many lawyers?!)


Wow. What did the letter say? You don't have to divulge it completely, but what was the gist of the letter?


Oh. While I was examining the letter from Harvard IT's legal team it fell into the fireplace and when I fished it out some glowing words appeared at the bottom! They read:
"PS Be careful when posting jokes on TLS because even though you may think it's obvious that absurd statements are not true it's very hard to convey tone on the internet and some people might take you seriously. One time this guy we knew had a friend or cousin who made jokes on TLS and his gerbil died the same day. If you have posted jokes on TLS, make sure to forward this letter to 5 friends within 24 hours or your gerbil might die too!"


Immaculate trolling. +180. Would read again.

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:45 pm

Honestly, do my posts count as trolling? I thought from the beginning they were patently ridiculous. Sorry for the folks I confused. :( :roll:

User avatar
chicky
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:14 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby chicky » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:46 pm

"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:48 pm

chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.


Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby barrelofmonkeys » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:49 pm

IrishJew wrote:
chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.


Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.


Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )

User avatar
JD1776
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:08 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby JD1776 » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:51 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
IrishJew wrote:
chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.


Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.


Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )


This is what rejections on Valentine's Day do to people haha.

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:52 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
IrishJew wrote:
chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.


Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.


Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )


Yeah, when I saw people asking me what the letter said I thought it was time to close it out. This is how balloon boys get started.

PS The Harvard login hack is real though.

PPS No. No it's not.

User avatar
chneyo
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby chneyo » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:53 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:55 pm

chneyo wrote:
So what DID the letter say?


It said:

"Dear Mr. Wycliff T. Sturgeon:
Chneyo = +1"

Very short and cryptic. What do you think it means?
Last edited by IrishJew on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Leo
Posts: 342
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:58 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Leo » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:55 pm

Using post 180 to say DLS, no call. Oh well, SLS was a long shot.

Submitted early November
3.7x / 171 / strong softs

User avatar
phillywc
Posts: 3043
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby phillywc » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:56 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
IrishJew wrote:
chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.


Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.


Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )

BOM gets a little ornery on Valentine's Day....

Why? Because she's at work and hasn't been able to watch house of cards yet, of course!

eta: trolling bom is always worth a post milestone
Last edited by phillywc on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

IrishJew
Posts: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby IrishJew » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:56 pm

Leo wrote:Using post 180 to say DLS, no call. Oh well, SLS was a long shot.

Submitted early November
3.7x / 171 / strong softs


Sorry, Doc Brown. That sucks.

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby barrelofmonkeys » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:58 pm

Leo wrote:Using post 180 to say DLS, no call. Oh well, SLS was a long shot.

Submitted early November
3.7x / 171 / strong softs


...fuck.

User avatar
barrelofmonkeys
Posts: 1906
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby barrelofmonkeys » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:58 pm

phillywc wrote:
barrelofmonkeys wrote:
IrishJew wrote:
Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.


Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )

BOM gets a little ornery on Valentine's Day....

Why? Because she's at work and hasn't been able to watch house of cards yet, of course!

eta: trolling bom is always worth a post milestone


love you too




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media and 3 guests