Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.

Have you been admitted?

Yes
76
21%
No
288
79%
 
Total votes: 364

User avatar
Jessasaurus
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Jessasaurus » Wed Feb 12, 2014 4:32 pm

Oh man time to obsess over my status checker.

edit: sorry specs and jd... best of luck to you guys

User avatar
Ren
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:42 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Ren » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:28 pm

Oh man, reaaaally sorry to all the dinged applicants today!

Do we think it is safe for the rest of us to assume we live to fight another day?

User avatar
Power_of_Facing
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Power_of_Facing » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:29 pm

Ren wrote:Oh man, reaaaally sorry to all the dinged applicants today!

Do we think it is safe for the rest of us to assume we live to fight another day?


Waaay too early for that.

User avatar
pseu
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:40 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby pseu » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:30 pm

Sorry to all the dings - I hope you all have the best of luck with your other options!

ejan1621
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:20 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby ejan1621 » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:32 pm

Wonder if there's any rhyme or reason to rejections going out. Early applicants maybe?

Moonlight
Posts: 753
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Moonlight » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:38 pm

All the dings had their status changed to DLS?

What's DLS stand for btw?

So does that mean UR is still a good sign here?

User avatar
drawstring
Posts: 1933
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby drawstring » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:39 pm

Moonlight wrote:All the dings had their status changed to DLS?

What's DLS stand for btw?

So does that mean UR is still a good sign here?


Decision letter sent

ejan1621 wrote:Wonder if there's any rhyme or reason to rejections going out. Early applicants maybe?


Hard to say just based on the tiny sample ITT, but Specs and JD were both early submitters, so maybe.

ejan1621
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:20 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby ejan1621 » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:42 pm

drawstring wrote:
Moonlight wrote:All the dings had their status changed to DLS?


ejan1621 wrote:Wonder if there's any rhyme or reason to rejections going out. Early applicants maybe?


Hard to say just based on the tiny sample ITT, but Specs and JD were both early submitters, so maybe.


Yeah, I hear you. I'm just in decision withdrawal and doing some random speculation to pass the time.

User avatar
charlie.black
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 3:11 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby charlie.black » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:42 pm

sorry to the dings :(

congrats on having some great options to soften the blow!

jdapplicant
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:05 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby jdapplicant » Wed Feb 12, 2014 8:29 pm

Moonlight wrote:All the dings had their status changed to DLS?

What's DLS stand for btw?

So does that mean UR is still a good sign here?



Yes, I would say that its a good sign if your status still reads UR.

And thanks everyone! Sorry to hear you're in the same boat as me Specs!

User avatar
Icecold62
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Icecold62 » Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:19 pm

Still UR. Alive for a little while longer at least....

User avatar
The-Specs
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby The-Specs » Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:23 pm

jdapplicant wrote:
Moonlight wrote:All the dings had their status changed to DLS?

What's DLS stand for btw?

So does that mean UR is still a good sign here?



Yes, I would say that its a good sign if your status still reads UR.

And thanks everyone! Sorry to hear you're in the same boat as me Specs!


Happy to be in good company jd. :)

User avatar
EquallyWrong
Posts: 3213
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby EquallyWrong » Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:24 pm

News of the day for me: Not rejected from Stanford.
Thank God, I can keep my pipe dreams alive for a bit longer...the sweet gentle opiate of being under review with no calls on my phone and my status checker free from hints of rejection. I am sorry to hear of anyone unceremoniously denied (congrats on Harvard), maybe it has braced your nerves and set you further on your inevitable path to legal greatness "But I, being poor, have only my dreams; / I have spread my dreams under your feet; / Tread softly because you tread on my dreams."

BillsFan9907
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby BillsFan9907 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:14 am

koalacity wrote:
bincognito wrote:Have dings gone out?

Not yet. Last year, the first dings reported on LSN were 2/14, and first on TLS were 2/20.


My understanding from the graph on page 1 is that acceptances should still come in the future, right?
Last edited by BillsFan9907 on Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The-Specs
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby The-Specs » Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:15 am

Seoulless wrote:
koalacity wrote:
bincognito wrote:Have dings gone out?

Not yet. Last year, the first dings reported on LSN were 2/14, and first on TLS were 2/20.


Once dings starts going out, that means there will be no more acceptances, right?


Wrong.

User avatar
midwest17
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby midwest17 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 4:18 am

The-Specs wrote:
Seoulless wrote:
koalacity wrote:
bincognito wrote:Have dings gone out?

Not yet. Last year, the first dings reported on LSN were 2/14, and first on TLS were 2/20.


Once dings starts going out, that means there will be no more acceptances, right?


Wrong.


Where do people come up with this stuff?

BillsFan9907
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby BillsFan9907 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:04 am

That was the impression I got from the back and forth several pages back. Checked the graph on the front page which clears everything up.

User avatar
gma221
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:45 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby gma221 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:16 pm

JUST GOT THE CALL!!!!!!!!! 9 a.m. PST.

171/3.5X/URM/almost 8 years WE. Dean Deal was exceedingly nice. I totally started crying on the phone with her. Still in utter shock. Cycle over for me, pretty much.

Wow.

User avatar
chneyo
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby chneyo » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:18 pm

...
Last edited by chneyo on Sat Feb 15, 2014 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Icecold62
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Icecold62 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:18 pm

gma221 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!!!!!!! 9 a.m. PST.

171/3.5X/URM/almost 8 years WE. Dean Deal was exceedingly nice. I totally started crying on the phone with her. Still in utter shock. Cycle over for me, pretty much.

Wow.


Congrats!

User avatar
musharraf
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 5:43 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby musharraf » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:19 pm

gma221 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!!!!!!! 9 a.m. PST.

171/3.5X/URM/almost 8 years WE. Dean Deal was exceedingly nice. I totally started crying on the phone with her. Still in utter shock. Cycle over for me, pretty much.

Wow.


Eish! Congratulations!!!

orangec90
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:57 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby orangec90 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:29 pm

gma221 wrote:JUST GOT THE CALL!!!!!!!!! 9 a.m. PST.

171/3.5X/URM/almost 8 years WE. Dean Deal was exceedingly nice. I totally started crying on the phone with her. Still in utter shock. Cycle over for me, pretty much.

Wow.


CONGRATS!!!!

complete date?

kartelite
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby kartelite » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:30 pm

Seoulless wrote:That was the impression I got from the back and forth several pages back. Checked the graph on the front page which clears everything up.


Okay seriously, the admissions deadline was LAST WEEK - do you really expect them to have gone through late applicants' files just because they started sending out rejections?

User avatar
gma221
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:45 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby gma221 » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:37 pm

orangec90 wrote:complete date?


Thanks, everyone! Complete date was 1/8.

User avatar
Power_of_Facing
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Postby Power_of_Facing » Thu Feb 13, 2014 1:52 pm

Not entirely sure if this is a new development, although I don't remember it being the case for earlier status checks...

The "If" that begins the sentence "If you have any questions, please contact the SLS Office of Admissions at admissions@law.stanford.edu" is now erroneously displayed at the top center (between the "Bio/Address/Demographics" box and the "Status" box) of my Applicant Status Report. Anyone else noticed this? I checked my status using two different browsers this morning, and the page was displayed the same way with each of them, so I think the glitch is on SLS's end.

Otherwise, there's been no change; I'm still under review.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blackpi, Ferrisjso, Google Feedfetcher, staypuff and 16 guests