Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- FuriousDuck
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 4:37 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
???
Last edited by Frozen98 on Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- FuriousDuck
- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Gary
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Does anyone know if this 3.8 GPA floor is rock solid? I'm very slightly lower, but my LSAT is well above the 75th. I apologize if this has been asked before, this is the only school whose thread I haven't followed because I didn't think I had a shot.
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
More than 25% of Stanford's class has less than a 3.8 GPA. They normally don't start accepting people with lower than a 3.8 until much later in the cycle and they can accept few people than Harvard so it's still a crapshoot for people like us (I have similar numbers) but you definitely have a chance.Gary wrote:Does anyone know if this 3.8 GPA floor is rock solid? I'm very slightly lower, but my LSAT is well above the 75th. I apologize if this has been asked before, this is the only school whose thread I haven't followed because I didn't think I had a shot.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Content Deleted
Last edited by Moonlight on Sat Jul 11, 2015 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- angels2fly
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think high 160s might have a shot? But I imagine it will be the same deal that evaluations and decisions on such applicants will be reserved for later on.Moonlight wrote:
Any chance for us reverse splitters?
- Gary
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks for the response jingo. Would a lack of California ties change your analysis?jingosaur wrote:More than 25% of Stanford's class has less than a 3.8 GPA. They normally don't start accepting people with lower than a 3.8 until much later in the cycle and they can accept few people than Harvard so it's still a crapshoot for people like us (I have similar numbers) but you definitely have a chance.Gary wrote:Does anyone know if this 3.8 GPA floor is rock solid? I'm very slightly lower, but my LSAT is well above the 75th. I apologize if this has been asked before, this is the only school whose thread I haven't followed because I didn't think I had a shot.
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I applied almost three weeks ago and still have no received my email containing my username and password to check the status of my application. Is that normal? What's the timeline for this thing?
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
That's actually an unusually long wait for Stanford. You might want to call them if you haven't received it by the 3 week mark. I assume you've checked your spam?Scvaz7 wrote:I applied almost three weeks ago and still have no received my email containing my username and password to check the status of my application. Is that normal? What's the timeline for this thing?
- thechancellor
- Posts: 584
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 1:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I got mine next day, although that was back in October. You're sure it didn't get filtered out by spam? If you've checked that, it may be to the point where its appropriate to call/email and ask... has anyone else had to do so?Scvaz7 wrote:I applied almost three weeks ago and still have no received my email containing my username and password to check the status of my application. Is that normal? What's the timeline for this thing?
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I check my spam regularly. I agree, I think it might be time to call.alex.cm wrote:I got mine next day, although that was back in October. You're sure it didn't get filtered out by spam? If you've checked that, it may be to the point where its appropriate to call/email and ask... has anyone else had to do so?Scvaz7 wrote:I applied almost three weeks ago and still have no received my email containing my username and password to check the status of my application. Is that normal? What's the timeline for this thing?
Has this happened to anyone else?
- Optimist Prime
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:28 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
So, just looking at the charts on the front page, looks like no news is good news for the month of February?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- residentemma
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Stanford is normally really quick with this. Just call/email them to make sure, can't hurtScvaz7 wrote:I check my spam regularly. I agree, I think it might be time to call.alex.cm wrote:I got mine next day, although that was back in October. You're sure it didn't get filtered out by spam? If you've checked that, it may be to the point where its appropriate to call/email and ask... has anyone else had to do so?Scvaz7 wrote:I applied almost three weeks ago and still have no received my email containing my username and password to check the status of my application. Is that normal? What's the timeline for this thing?
Has this happened to anyone else?
- teampeeta
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Historically, I believe some Dec/Jan submitters have received good news in February. But if you applied before mid-November, the only news you're likely to hear this month is the negative sort.Optimist Prime wrote:So, just looking at the charts on the front page, looks like no news is good news for the month of February?
- nothingtosee
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 12:08 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Any info anyone can give you is based primarily off mylsn.info and the school's published 25/50/75 cutoffs.Gary wrote:Thanks for the response jingo. Would a lack of California ties change your analysis?jingosaur wrote:More than 25% of Stanford's class has less than a 3.8 GPA. They normally don't start accepting people with lower than a 3.8 until much later in the cycle and they can accept few people than Harvard so it's still a crapshoot for people like us (I have similar numbers) but you definitely have a chance.Gary wrote:Does anyone know if this 3.8 GPA floor is rock solid? I'm very slightly lower, but my LSAT is well above the 75th. I apologize if this has been asked before, this is the only school whose thread I haven't followed because I didn't think I had a shot.
Play around here:
http://mylsn.info/dispresults.php
It's the best anyone can do.
http://mylsn.info/ah6jlz/
But I would say the odds are not in your favor. I would guess a good portion of those <3.8 GPAs are URM.
- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Wed Feb 12, 2014 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol just got that too
- goldenflash19
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1. Don't usually unsubscribe to these but making an exception this time.chneyo wrote:CURSES, SAMford!!
Bless you, STANford.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+100 lolgoldenflash19 wrote:+1. Don't usually unsubscribe to these but making an exception this time.chneyo wrote:CURSES, SAMford!!
Bless you, STANford.
- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol, me too. I'm thinking of starting a change.org petition to ban unsolicited communications from Samford on grounds of public health. My poor heart can't take anymore of this, especially now that we've entered the month where waitlist and rejections start going out.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Icecold62
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:40 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1Moonlight wrote:+100 lolgoldenflash19 wrote:+1. Don't usually unsubscribe to these but making an exception this time.chneyo wrote:CURSES, SAMford!!
Bless you, STANford.
- Jessasaurus
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+100kershka wrote:lol, me too. I'm thinking of starting a change.org petition to ban unsolicited communications from Samford on grounds of public health. My poor heart can't take anymore of this, especially now that we've entered the month where waitlist and rejections start going out.
- admiringatticus
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I cannot handle two emails from law schools that start with "S" within 15 minutes of each other. Darn you Samford and Stetson Law!!!
- Slytherpuff
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Unsubscribe x 1000admiringatticus wrote:I cannot handle two emails from law schools that start with "S" within 15 minutes of each other. Darn you Samford and Stetson Law!!!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login