Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:41 pm

China Spy wrote:My IRL friends think I'm nerotic for checking my checkers every morning. Then I read posts on TLS like the ones found on this page, and that's when I know I am still sane.

How does one measure sanity on TLS?

malleus discentium · Post by **malleus discentium** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:42 pm

Nonconsecutive wrote:
China Spy wrote:My IRL friends think I'm nerotic for checking my checkers every morning. Then I read posts on TLS like the ones found on this page, and that's when I know I am still sane.
How does one measure sanity on TLS?

Indeed. The inference is not that you are sane, merely that there are others like you

China Spy · Post by **China Spy** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:43 pm

Touché. Also I think we have out new poll question.

kershka · Post by **kershka** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:44 pm

I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.

Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom

China Spy · Post by **China Spy** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:45 pm

kershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.

Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom

Well I went an entire day w/o checking yesterday. But now I need to be on the lookout for that whole uppercase/lowercase email switch.

Nonconsecutive · Post by **Nonconsecutive** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:46 pm

kershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.

Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom

Classic displacement,

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:47 pm

kershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.

Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom

I haven't checked since I went complete

But I do periodically check my phone for missed messages

teenybean · Post by **teenybean** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:50 pm

I'm on campus now... I'm considering running a covert operation to "adjust" the admit list. I have black pantyhose in my car...

China Spy · Post by **China Spy** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:51 pm

teenybean wrote:I'm on campus now... I'm considering running a covert operation to "adjust" the admit list. I have black pantyhose in my car...

Prty sure Faye just read this msg and your cover is blown.

kershka · Post by **kershka** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:51 pm

China Spy wrote:
kershka wrote:I'm curious how many people ITT still check the SLS status checker regularly? I used to but since it never changes, I've sort of given up.

Now I just check my phone for missed messages every time I go to the bathroom
Well I went an entire day w/o checking yesterday. But now I need to be on the lookout for that whole uppercase/lowercase email switch.

The uppercase/lowercase is sadly no longer a thing, or at least it hasn't been for any of the admitted people thus far this cycle. We think that DLS will still indicate a waitlist or rejection, though obviously we cannot prove that since there haven't been any of either so far.

teenybean · Post by **teenybean** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:53 pm

lololol my cover isn't near blown (i've been savvy and particular with my words, plus my UG is really random)

drawstring · Post by **drawstring** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:55 pm

But now she knows you're coming! She'll be ready...........

China Spy · Post by **China Spy** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:57 pm

Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:58 pm

China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.

is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:59 pm

scoobers wrote:
China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.

eta: credit: bom

teenybean · Post by **teenybean** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:59 pm

drawstring wrote:But now she knows you're coming! She'll be ready...........

hmmm I'll settle for her knowing that WE'RE ALL GOING CRAZY HERE instead. This is too too long.

Kimikho · Post by **Kimikho** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:05 pm

barrelofmonkeys wrote:
scoobers wrote:
China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.
eta: credit: bom

<3

China Spy · Post by **China Spy** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:29 am

scoobers wrote:
China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.

Fails to consider that a selfie may involve using the timer on a camera rather than relying on monkeys.

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:46 am

China Spy wrote:
scoobers wrote:
China Spy wrote:Scoobs, I'm digging the duck face in your new selfie. Looks very authentic.
is it a selfie when someone else holds the camera? I've always wondered.
Fails to consider that a selfie may involve using the timer on a camera rather than relying on monkeys.

dumb but i laughed anyway

HarvardHopeful · Post by **HarvardHopeful** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:16 pm

ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!

koalacity · Post by **koalacity** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:17 pm

HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!

IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD

OMG CONGRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Howl · Post by **Howl** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:18 pm

HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!

IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD

CONGRATS!!!!!!

bbkk · Post by **bbkk** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:18 pm

HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!

IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD

OMG OMG Congrats!!!!!

Arrow4Christ · Post by **Arrow4Christ** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:20 pm

HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!

IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD

Congratulations!!!

barrelofmonkeys · Post by **barrelofmonkeys** » Fri Jan 31, 2014 2:20 pm

HarvardHopeful wrote:ITS BEGUN!!!! GET YOUR PHONES READY!

IN!!!!!! JUST GOT THE CALL 2 MINUTES AGO STILL SHAKING
Complete 11/7, 174 LSAT 3.9X K-JD

MAJOR congrats!

Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum

Have you been admitted?

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Register for access!

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Register now!

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?