Top Law Schools

Hattori Hanzo wrote:

amsong wrote:

Hattori Hanzo wrote:IIRC additional LORs are submitted like the first 3 through LSAC. LOCI is sent directly.
LOCI: wait until you have something to say. They obviously know everybody on the WL or held would love to get in and not sending in a LOCI won't be interpreted as lack of interest.

Apologies, I was unclear -- from my view, LSAC is telling me that Harvard has been assigned the maximum number of LOR (3), so I don't currently see a way of sending an additional one through LSAC. No worries if you don't know anything about this, though, as I imagine the technical aspects of apps/additional info change slightly every year.

Re: LOCI: good to know.

Thank you again! Incidentally, I'm in the middle of a Tarantino marathon. Kill Bill is weird for me because I watched Part II before I knew Part I was even a movie (I don't know how that happened).

Yeah my info is from 2010 so things could have changed.

I was watching the Crazy 88 scene yesterday! What a movie :>

amsong wrote:Is two pages too long of an update on my activites + Why Harvard?

vzapana wrote:

amsong wrote:Is two pages too long of an update on my activites + Why Harvard?

yes. my college pre-law advisor once said that for any supplementary statement, never go beyond one page. otherwise, the adcomm will hate you.

broadstreet11 wrote:Got my invitation to join this party!

Lavitz wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:Got my invitation to join this party!

Who invited you? You belong in the JS1 party across the street.

broadstreet11 wrote:

Lavitz wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:Either way, I hope you get your JS2 and I my JS1 (and then JS2) out of this hold pile.

broadstreet11 wrote:

Lavitz wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:Got my invitation to join this party!

Who invited you? You belong in the JS1 party across the street.

Too kind sir. Not sure whether the multiple LSATs or late LSAT update hurt me. Either way, I hope you get your JS2 and I my JS1 (and then JS2) out of this hold pile.

helix23 wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:

Lavitz wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:Either way, I hope you get your JS2 and I my JS1 (and then JS2) out of this hold pile.

what's that supposed to mean?

Lavitz wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:

Lavitz wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:Got my invitation to join this party!

Who invited you? You belong in the JS1 party across the street.

Too kind sir. Not sure whether the multiple LSATs or late LSAT update hurt me. Either way, I hope you get your JS2 and I my JS1 (and then JS2) out of this hold pile.

I honestly believe it's just the late LSAT update. They know they have to re-evaluate your entire application in the context of this recent development. So maybe they just decided to let you know they were pushing you further down the list to give themselves enough time to do so.

I'm sure if they were willing to interview me, you'll get yours eventually.

broadstreet11 wrote:

helix23 wrote: what's that supposed to mean?

Just hope Lavitz comes out with a JS2...that's all. My fault, not as clear as it could've been.

broadstreet11 wrote:Thanks. Now that Columbia is onto real admissions talk, can this become the video game thread? After all, we have three more months.

Lavitz wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:Thanks. Now that Columbia is onto real admissions talk, can this become the video game thread? After all, we have three more months.

Lol, that's up to Helix. He rules this thread with an iron fist after all.

helix23 wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:

helix23 wrote: what's that supposed to mean?

Just hope Lavitz comes out with a JS2...that's all. My fault, not as clear as it could've been.

jk dawg

kingsfield69 wrote:

helix23 wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:

helix23 wrote: what's that supposed to mean?

Just hope Lavitz comes out with a JS2...that's all. My fault, not as clear as it could've been.

jk dawg

I hope you go to Harvard.

helix23 wrote:

broadstreet11 wrote:

helix23 wrote: what's that supposed to mean?

Just hope Lavitz comes out with a JS2...that's all. My fault, not as clear as it could've been.

jk dawg

rower23 wrote:Checking in, 3.73 174 and a Master's. Pretty good softs, but coming straight from undergrad/grad. No JS1

helix23 wrote:
ain't happening, brother, but I'm sure I'll see you in court one day. get your big boy litigation pants on!

rower23 wrote:Checking in, 3.73 174 and a Master's. Pretty good softs, but coming straight from undergrad/grad. No JS1

twinkletoes16 wrote:

rower23 wrote:Checking in, 3.73 174 and a Master's. Pretty good softs, but coming straight from undergrad/grad. No JS1

crap these are my stats, but no master's... so i'm likely going to be officially posting here soon if i avoid the ding pile