Top Law Schools

shntn wrote:

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:If you had told me in December that I would have absolutely NO new scholarship offers by mid-March, I'd call you crazy.

Looks like I'm the crazy one.

Do you still have that winerum I sent? Break it out if so.

LOL god, my memory is so terrible. Acquiring winerum now.

gatorgirl2012 wrote:Bumping

I know I am not alone in my misery. Who else has more than 5 apps pending out there in decision limbo?

7.

kaydee wrote:

gatorgirl2012 wrote:Bumping

I know I am not alone in my misery. Who else has more than 5 apps pending out there in decision limbo?

7.

+1

FlowBro wrote:

kaydee wrote:

gatorgirl2012 wrote:Bumping

I know I am not alone in my misery. Who else has more than 5 apps pending out there in decision limbo?

7.

+1

+2. Starting to get irritated by some that have been in review since dec/jan..

FlowBro wrote:

kaydee wrote:

gatorgirl2012 wrote:Bumping

I know I am not alone in my misery. Who else has more than 5 apps pending out there in decision limbo?

7.

+1

9 - applied late Nov/early Dec.

leximex21 wrote:

FlowBro wrote:

kaydee wrote:

gatorgirl2012 wrote:Bumping

I know I am not alone in my misery. Who else has more than 5 apps pending out there in decision limbo?

7.

+1

+2. Starting to get irritated by some that have been in review since dec/jan..

+1000000

I'm especially annoyed by those schools which I shouldn't have any problem being accepted into. It's frustrating!

I have not heard from Stanford, U of CHicago, BU, NU, and NYU. In the last couple of days i just heard from UVA(ding), Berkley(ding), Cornell(accept), BC9Accept), Columbia(held).....

pedestrian wrote:

FlowBro wrote:

kaydee wrote:

gatorgirl2012 wrote:Bumping

I know I am not alone in my misery. Who else has more than 5 apps pending out there in decision limbo?

7.

+1

9 - applied late Nov/early Dec.

Yeah I have 9 also...

7.[/quote]

+1[/quote]

9 - applied late Nov/early Dec.[/quote]

Yeah I have 9 also...[/quote]

I`m not even sure I want to hear anymore. The ones that are taking forever end up being Acceptances with laughable scholarships anyway...

----------

+1000000

I'm especially annoyed by those schools which I shouldn't have any problem being accepted into. It's frustrating![/quote]

Geez I had to double check that it wasn't me that posted this. WTF safeties!?!
I feel your frustration...

From what I've seen based on skimming LSN and the forum, UChicago and Stanford have been the worst...

pedestrian wrote:9

I'm going to stop complaining about my remaining 4...

..

sublime12089 wrote:.... Waiting on hearing from 16/18. That is my own damn fault though for waiting until super late to apply.

I've got about ten out as well, mostly dec/jan. Even my UG alma mater hasn't changed my status from "app complete 1/19"

sublime12089 wrote:.... Waiting on hearing from 16/18. That is my own damn fault though for waiting until super late to apply.

You just made me feel a whole a lot better about my 6 pending apps...although I applied in January..somewhat late...It has been 2 damn months though...

..

The problem with being slow to send out acceptances is that some of us have to make decisions on schools/schollies by april 1st ....I have 4 schools i am waiting on anything....no WL, Ding or acceptance. I realize that 3 of the schools I am somewhat of a long shot at, Chicago, Stanford, NU. Plus the scholarship info has not be sent out as fast also....

There is absolutely no reason why a religion is able to choose a new leader before a law school can choose whether to admit me or not.

wannabelawstudent wrote:There is absolutely no reason why a religion is able to choose a new leader before a law school can choose whether to admit me or not.

Any idea if it's common for out of staters to be accepted to state schools before in staters if each has "meh" numbers?

wannabelawstudent wrote:There is absolutely no reason why a religion is able to choose a new leader before a law school can choose whether to admit me or not.

morrissey wrote:Any idea if it's common for out of staters to be accepted to state schools before in staters if each has "meh" numbers?

Well depends if its a public school or not. If it is a public school, they'll favor the in-staters (some have mandatory quotas of in-staters, some have soft unofficial quotas etc.) If its private, it usually doesn't matter.

wannabelawstudent wrote:There is absolutely no reason why a religion is able to choose a new leader before a law school can choose whether to admit me or not.

I think tonight i am going to start thinning the herd of acceptances....some schools i have decided NOT to attend. It will give those who still wait in the wings to get a chance.

wannabelawstudent wrote:Well depends if its a public school or not. If it is a public school, they'll favor the in-staters (some have mandatory quotas of in-staters, some have soft unofficial quotas etc.) If its private, it usually doesn't matter.

Yeah that's what I meant, a state public school. I just find it odd that I, a resident, am still in review when several nonresidents with considerably lower numbers have been admitted via LSN. Just venting frustration I guess ha.

uconjak wrote:

wannabelawstudent wrote:There is absolutely no reason why a religion is able to choose a new leader before a law school can choose whether to admit me or not.

I think tonight i am going to start thinning the herd of acceptances....some schools i have decided NOT to attend. It will give those who still wait in the wings to get a chance.

How many elipses and periods were in your personal statement?