+1. I'm traveling today so I sure hope I land to good news.crchildress wrote:That sure would be nice.GardenGnome wrote:We should hear today. Decisions went out of 2/22 and 3/8 last year. Decisions went out on 2/22 again this year, so if the patern continues we should get some decisions today.Mj23la wrote:Status hasn't changed since Jan 14..the wait is killing me!
SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
This is becoming truly painful...Mj23la wrote:Status hasn't changed since Jan 14..the wait is killing me!
- crchildress
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:44 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Looks like we might have to wait at least a couple more weeks.GardenGnome wrote:This is becoming truly painful...Mj23la wrote:Status hasn't changed since Jan 14..the wait is killing me!
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
To all my fellow waiters...my status updated to today, 3/11, with the "you may have noticed that your current status date has changed" language at the top.
Hope we know something soon.
Hope we know something soon.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
+1. Hopefully today is the day...Wes0568 wrote:To all my fellow waiters...my status updated to today, 3/11, with the "you may have noticed that your current status date has changed" language at the top.
Hope we know something soon.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:57 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Ugh...I haven't seen a change...just stays at "application completed"....good luck to you both! Hope we all hear soon!
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
IN!! Via status checker just now!!
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Grats to everyone. Anyone else apply to both FT and PT? Just got accepted PT via status check, but no update on FT. Anyone else in a similar boat?
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 10:11 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I applied for both but am still "Held for Further Review" as of 01/28/13...GardenGnome wrote:Grats to everyone. Anyone else apply to both FT and PT? Just got accepted PT via status check, but no update on FT. Anyone else in a similar boat?
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I applied PT only. Congrats!GardenGnome wrote:Grats to everyone. Anyone else apply to both FT and PT? Just got accepted PT via status check, but no update on FT. Anyone else in a similar boat?
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
also was just admitted through status checker...my app was sitting complete as of early january so hopefully a lot of you long-time waiters hear back today.
I applied only PT btw.
I applied only PT btw.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Why don't y'all have your numbers in your profile? AHHH!
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Seems like everyone who was admitted this morning was PT. Maybe there is still hope for FT in the afternoon.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chem!
- Posts: 9573
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I applied to both and got PT. Its one or the other for the acceptance.GardenGnome wrote:Grats to everyone. Anyone else apply to both FT and PT? Just got accepted PT via status check, but no update on FT. Anyone else in a similar boat?
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
So you can't get accepted to both? That seems pretty ridiculous.chemteacher wrote:I applied to both and got PT. Its one or the other for the acceptance.GardenGnome wrote:Grats to everyone. Anyone else apply to both FT and PT? Just got accepted PT via status check, but no update on FT. Anyone else in a similar boat?
- chem!
- Posts: 9573
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012013 cycle)
Ridiculous or not, it is clearly stated on the application information.GardenGnome wrote:So you can't get accepted to both? That seems pretty ridiculous.chemteacher wrote:I applied to both and got PT. Its one or the other for the acceptance.GardenGnome wrote:Grats to everyone. Anyone else apply to both FT and PT? Just got accepted PT via status check, but no update on FT. Anyone else in a similar boat?
- crchildress
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:44 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I also applied for both And still held for further review. Congratulations to everyone who did get accepted today, hopefully the rest of us are next.JBCIV wrote:I applied for both but am still "Held for Further Review" as of 01/28/13...GardenGnome wrote:Grats to everyone. Anyone else apply to both FT and PT? Just got accepted PT via status check, but no update on FT. Anyone else in a similar boat?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
From what I've learned from trolling a bunch on here, it seems that people who apply to both with FT as their top choice with lower end numbers are held for further review so they can fill their FT spots with better numbers first. Then I'm guessing if they fill up the FT they will offer you a PT slot if they are still open. People who apply solely to the PT program with lower numbers seem to be accepted more quickly.
I just got my Feb LSAT score (159 ) I'm retesting in June but if it's not any better I will only be applying to the PT program for this reason.
I just got my Feb LSAT score (159 ) I'm retesting in June but if it's not any better I will only be applying to the PT program for this reason.
- crchildress
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:44 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
That's a good observation, and could explain others' and my status.TheJanitor6203 wrote:From what I've learned from trolling a bunch on here, it seems that people who apply to both with FT as their top choice with lower end numbers are held for further review so they can fill their FT spots with better numbers first. Then I'm guessing if they fill up the FT they will offer you a PT slot if they are still open. People who apply solely to the PT program with lower numbers seem to be accepted more quickly.
I just got my Feb LSAT score (159 ) I'm retesting in June but if it's not any better I will only be applying to the PT program for this reason.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
At least SMU rose a bit in rankings...a lot of T1 and T2 between the ranks of 20 and 80 got shaken around.
Anyone having to reconsider options bc of the shakeup? Texas schools stayed strong though.
Anyone having to reconsider options bc of the shakeup? Texas schools stayed strong though.
- Well_he_did_not
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
U of Houston's rank is looking pretty good this year, might take 2nd look at their acceptance offer since Baylor went down a couple by comparison.
Also BC went down to 31? Not so bueno....
Also BC went down to 31? Not so bueno....
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Up 3 in FT and PT. Nice. I'm a little surprised to see Baylor go down two though.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I always feel like if one of these Texas schools wanted to crack the top 25 they could, SMU especially.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'd like to know what's holding them back. SMU seems just as competitive as a lot of the higher ranked schools with fairly similar medians.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Does anyone have access to the new 25/75 lsat numbers?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login