SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- jenm12
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:47 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I was accepted FT in mid-January (whoop!) but am still weighing my options... I know Texas Wesleyan doesn't have near the prestige/reputation of SMU, but they offered me a scholarship that would take care of about 3/4ths of my tuition and keep me out of any law school debt. Any thoughts on whether or not the money saved would be worth it?
(Obviously my decision will be made a little easier once scholarship decisions for SMU come out -- hopefully soon!)
(Obviously my decision will be made a little easier once scholarship decisions for SMU come out -- hopefully soon!)
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I think popular wisdom is go to SMU, as it offers better employment prospects. No point in going to law school if you can't find a job.jenm12 wrote:I was accepted FT in mid-January (whoop!) but am still weighing my options... I know Texas Wesleyan doesn't have near the prestige/reputation of SMU, but they offered me a scholarship that would take care of about 3/4ths of my tuition and keep me out of any law school debt. Any thoughts on whether or not the money saved would be worth it?
(Obviously my decision will be made a little easier once scholarship decisions for SMU come out -- hopefully soon!)
Congrats on getting in!
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:34 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
jenm12 wrote:I was accepted FT in mid-January (whoop!) but am still weighing my options... I know Texas Wesleyan doesn't have near the prestige/reputation of SMU, but they offered me a scholarship that would take care of about 3/4ths of my tuition and keep me out of any law school debt. Any thoughts on whether or not the money saved would be worth it?
(Obviously my decision will be made a little easier once scholarship decisions for SMU come out -- hopefully soon!)
Congrats on both Dallas schools Im waiting to hear back. I agree with poster above, that SMU >>>>>>>TW...of course, it's super attractive to not have debt. I would say , dont worry until you see SMU's scholly package at least. I think TW is ranked too far out of SMU's league to consider going to TW over SMU...but then smu at sticker vs TW with no debt...hmm...also depends on what you want to do when you grow up...
wannabelawstudent: cool avator. He's my favourite doctor!!
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I dunno....if your only options are SMU at sticker and Tex wes id say reassess your options. If you go to Tex wes you're pretty much flipping a coin on if you get a legal job or not, and opprotunities that SMU can give you just aren't there.
Look at the employment numbers on lawschooltransparency.com I wouldn't risk my life going to Tex west.
Chemteacher knows a bit more about the area and the schools so I'm sure she can give you some wise words, but I bet they are similar in my sentiment
Look at the employment numbers on lawschooltransparency.com I wouldn't risk my life going to Tex west.
Chemteacher knows a bit more about the area and the schools so I'm sure she can give you some wise words, but I bet they are similar in my sentiment
- jenm12
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:47 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Thanks for the advice! I'm pretty hopeful that I'll get at least some $ from SMU, I just know it won't be nearly as much as what TWU offered, especially considering the difference in tuition. The attorney I work for now is a TWU alum and she does incredibly well for herself, but I know the fact that she stayed in Fort Worth has a lot to do with that.
As of now, I'm hoping to practice within the realms of public interest/civil liberties law, which is another reason I'm extra leery of law school debt, since I know the payout is nowhere near that of big law (at least at the bottom).
As of now, I'm hoping to practice within the realms of public interest/civil liberties law, which is another reason I'm extra leery of law school debt, since I know the payout is nowhere near that of big law (at least at the bottom).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:34 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I am in DFW area as well, and I have heard of several attorneys who have graduated from TW, and do well for themselves. I dont know them personally, but I have heard of them. (so take it with a grain of salt).They are in the fort worth area. That being said, these are all "seasoned" attorneys, ie..people who graduated in the 80s,90s etc. They didnt graduate in our current economy. SMU doesn't have a LRAP program so that is also something you want to consider. Would you be able to continue working for your current boss once you graduate? Do you want to remain in Fort Worth?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Wesleyan is an objectively terrible school with abysmal employment prospects. Don't go to Wesleyan if you want a job as a lawyer.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
hands down, SMU. Honestly, if I were to attend school in Texas, my order of preference would be UT, then a tie between U of H and SMU. I leave out Baylor because it's in Waco, and I would think hard and long before spending 3 years there. I have a ton of lawyer friends there that also did TW, St.Marys, South Texas (yikes) and then Baylor/SMU/UT/UH. UT grads obviously got the best jobs, although it was hard for many of them to stay in competitive Austin, so many of them end up getting the good jobs in Dallas/Houston. SMU is great for Dallas, but you'll still have to network quite a bit since you're competing with UT grads.jenm12 wrote:I was accepted FT in mid-January (whoop!) but am still weighing my options... I know Texas Wesleyan doesn't have near the prestige/reputation of SMU, but they offered me a scholarship that would take care of about 3/4ths of my tuition and keep me out of any law school debt. Any thoughts on whether or not the money saved would be worth it?
(Obviously my decision will be made a little easier once scholarship decisions for SMU come out -- hopefully soon!)
Edited to add Baylor!
Last edited by bluegreen on Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Can someone gimme the breakdown between SMU and Baylor?
- Magnoliab1071
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:24 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
There has been a lot of discussion about this in previous threads.As far as rankings go, it seems that they are neck and neck. I think SMU is a little bit more prestigious, and Baylor has a much heavier workload (esp for 3L). A big difference between the two, and the reason I completely ruled out Baylor, is that I would MUCH rather live in Dallas than Waco. There is NOTHING in Waco except for Baylor.wannabelawstudent wrote:Can someone gimme the breakdown between SMU and Baylor?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Do you want an easygoing experience with generally nice people, or do you want an awful experience with tons of work added for no reason other than to make you work more, at a school that encourages and nurtures a cutthroat environment?wannabelawstudent wrote:Can someone gimme the breakdown between SMU and Baylor?
Or, conversely, a school that will tell you you can't take a paying summer job if it interferes with Practice Court, even if you never want to go into a courtroom, ever?
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Ummm...I want the former.kalvano wrote:Do you want an easygoing experience with generally nice people, or do you want an awful experience with tons of work added for no reason other than to make you work more, at a school that encourages and nurtures a cutthroat environment?wannabelawstudent wrote:Can someone gimme the breakdown between SMU and Baylor?
Or, conversely, a school that will tell you you can't take a paying summer job if it interferes with Practice Court, even if you never want to go into a courtroom, ever?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Then go wih SMU. Baylor really doesn't have terrible job prospects in total. SMU does better at large and midsize firms, but their overall employment score is similar. But the three years getting there will be phenomenally more miserable at Baylor than at SMU.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chem!
- Posts: 9573
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Seconded.kalvano wrote:Wesleyan is an objectively terrible school with abysmal employment prospects. Don't go to Wesleyan if you want a job as a lawyer.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
LSstatuscheck informed me there was a change on my status check page....they removed a blank line from my address....WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Apparently, they mailed something to me on the 28th. O.o
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:34 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
wannabelawstudent wrote:LSstatuscheck informed me there was a change on my status check page....they removed a blank line from my address....WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN
Hopefully it means somewhere there is awake :O...we have same complete dates , but no movement on mine...ie, no line removal
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- swilson215
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:35 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Weighing in: I have friends at TW, and all of them are trying as hard as they can to transfer out. Although they do give out A+'s, and it seems to me (from them) that they grade easier. That all being said, unless TW was flat out free, I would pick SMU over it. As far as Baylor, you couldn't pay me enough to live in Waco for three years. Their job prospects aren't nearly as bad as TW's (or any of the other TTT in Texas), and you're basically guaranteed to pass the bar, but everyone I know who went there does nothing but bitch about the curriculum break down and the objectively HORRIBLE third year program.
- FallingHigher
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Is there any news on the scholarship information? I got into UT and will most likely be going there so I want to go ahead and lease an apt. before they all get booked, but if SMU pulls through with a good scholly I might be persuaded to stay in dallas.
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
-
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:45 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
+1 they have a major leg up in TX big lawkalvano wrote:Go to UT.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
+1000000Jredelman15 wrote:+1 they have a major leg up in TX big lawkalvano wrote:Go to UT.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:34 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
UT >>>smu unless you NEED to be in dallas. Only way I would think about it is if it's smu for free (school + living expenses) and it's UT at sticker.
Baylor: I didnt apply to Baylor. I sort of regret it now because people with my numbers (or even slightly below) are getting full rides.The very idea of Waco for three years is scary! I wish they would move their law program to dallas like they did the dental school. I do know some people who live in waco during the week, and drive back every weekend to dfw. (not an attractive option for me either) It's true that Baylor grads are pretty much guaranteed to pass the bar, but with a good bar prep and some time, an smu grad shouldnt have any issues either I dont think.
Baylor: I didnt apply to Baylor. I sort of regret it now because people with my numbers (or even slightly below) are getting full rides.The very idea of Waco for three years is scary! I wish they would move their law program to dallas like they did the dental school. I do know some people who live in waco during the week, and drive back every weekend to dfw. (not an attractive option for me either) It's true that Baylor grads are pretty much guaranteed to pass the bar, but with a good bar prep and some time, an smu grad shouldnt have any issues either I dont think.
- FallingHigher
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Thanks for this. I was all set to go but then my commitment issues kicked in haha. UT at sticker is scary considering I am completely bore after undergrad, but I think it is worth it.bluegreen wrote:+1000000Jredelman15 wrote:+1 they have a major leg up in TX big lawkalvano wrote:Go to UT.
- TheRedBlueBerry
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:12 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Does SMU require parent information on the FAFSA? I know most schools don't, but I have heard a few do. I couldn't find any info about parent info on the smu financial aid site/ other SMU threads on TLS. Thanks!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login