WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
MKC

Diamond
Posts: 16246
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MKC » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:00 pm

Green317 wrote:
MarkinKansasCity wrote:Don't be a sucker. 166/3.25 = Full Ride at WUSTL this year. Your numbers may be more valuable than you realize this year.
Ha! I will try not to be one! Although I am not sure if my numbers are especially valuable...166/3.75 (with some stellar softs, although they don't really factor in at this point).
That's above-median (almost 75th) GPA at Cornell and 25th percentile LSAT. If they already hit their LSAT target, your GPA might be enough for some money. You won't know unless you push the issue though.

dstars823

Bronze
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by dstars823 » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:02 pm

never hurts to ask, the worst they can say is no.

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:02 pm

Green317 wrote: Although I am not sure if my numbers are especially valuable...166/3.75 (with some stellar softs, although they don't really factor in at this point).
Nonsense. Your numbers are very valuable. If you really want T14 then consider re-taking/re-applying with a higher score. It would be unfortunate to waste that GPA on sticker when you could go to T20 for free or wait a year and go T14 with money

Green317

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:55 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Green317 » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:20 pm

Well, re-taking and re-applying aren't options that I'd like to pursue....I am not getting any younger (I'm not sure if I'd count as "non-traditional" but I will be significantly older than the average law student, wherever I go).

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:34 pm

..

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Green317

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:55 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Green317 » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:41 pm

Low-T14 at sticker is definitely hard to justify, although I wonder what I will say in 20 years...will I wish I had taken the plunge, so that my career would be better by the point (assuming it would be better)? Or will I still be struggling to pay off the debt, and wishing I had just taken WUSTL's full ride and hopped on a bus to St. Louis?

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:52 pm

..

Green317

New
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:55 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Green317 » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:01 pm

That's a valid point, but I worry about getting on the "retake train" and never getting off....say I retake and get some money at a low-T14. Then there will still be incentive to retake again to get more money. Or to get accepted into a higher-ranked T14. And then to retake again to try to get money from that higher-ranked T14. I could see how this could just never end. At some point, you need to be satisfied with the available options, even if those options could -- in theory -- be better with improved with a retake. And all that is assuming that a retake will definitely result in a score increase, which is a dubious proposition.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:06 pm

..

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:28 pm


User avatar
Homelandsagreatshow

Bronze
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:19 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Homelandsagreatshow » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:39 pm

I dunno if this has been brought up, but where does this thread compare to recent threads, size-wise?

385+ pages has to be getting up there, right?

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:40 pm

Homelandsagreatshow wrote:I dunno if this has been brought up, but where does this thread compare to recent threads, size-wise?

385+ pages has to be getting up there, right?
Last year's WUSTL thread capped at like 97 or something if i remember correctly....And yeah I think we're a few pages away from being the largest thread in this forum. We're already the biggest for this cycle.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:41 pm

..

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:43 pm

sublime wrote:
Homelandsagreatshow wrote:I dunno if this has been brought up, but where does this thread compare to recent threads, size-wise?

385+ pages has to be getting up there, right?

Well, since it is no longer the "Best (never of the first page)" it isn't even real.

Why did we change that again? Can we reinstate that? lol
I will change it if we successfully poach WokeUpInACar from UT.
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 1&t=211412

User avatar
simplycatalina

Silver
Posts: 935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by simplycatalina » Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:48 pm

just got in off the WL today.

jdmonkey

Bronze
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jdmonkey » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:35 pm

Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?

Dolphine

Bronze
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 12:38 am

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Dolphine » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:37 pm

jdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
Nope. Just signed a lease at a nice modest place here http://www.yorkhousestl.com/

Congrats catalina!

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:39 pm

jdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
Trying to decide if i wanna get maid service

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:44 pm

..

jdmonkey

Bronze
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jdmonkey » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:44 pm

Dolphine wrote:
jdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
Nope. Just signed a lease at a nice modest place here http://www.yorkhousestl.com/

Congrats catalina!
Haha. That looks nicer than modest.

jdmonkey

Bronze
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jdmonkey » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:47 pm

sublime wrote:
cusenation wrote:
jdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
Trying to decide if i wanna get maid service
lol

I bought a bottle of Stoli. Not "nice" or "unusual" but certainly higher shelf than I typically go.

What about you jdmonkey?
I'm going to be in STL on Thursday so I bought Diamond Box tickets for Cards Cubs. I never spent 160 before on a baseball ticket so God willing the weather is nice.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sublime » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:50 pm

..

jdmonkey

Bronze
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jdmonkey » Mon Jun 17, 2013 11:53 pm

sublime wrote:Nice man.
Thanks. I'm looking forward to it.

User avatar
JCougar

Gold
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by JCougar » Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:06 am

From a different thread:
MikeSpivey wrote:My guess is that they may have just received a very large unrestricted "gift" and perhaps see this as a strategic year to use it since there likely will be a good deal of losers and only a few winners in the admissions arms race. Indeed, I think it is possible they have had a reserve budget for just this opportunity and perhaps now have decided to employ it, based on the data they have. This is purely guess-work by me but this might be the strategic thinking...
I think Spivey might be on to something here. I'll go further. This move will totally fuck with other schools, who are currently walking a tightrope with their budgets/medians in admitting students. WUSTL isn't the only splitter school in the 19-30 range. GW, Minnesota and Indiana have nearly identical admissions practices (the former being fierce competitors), and the California schools (UCLA/USC) have gotten a lot more splitter-friendly lately. And as the life of the splitter school goes, your target medians are a few withdrawals away from total collapse. If this move poaches matriculants from these other schools, it could really throw a wrench in to their gears.

The greater university has a massive endowment, especially when controlled for the number of students and the STL cost of living. It has long been a goal of the Medical School (ranked #1 in the nation as near as 5 years ago) and the greater university to get the law and business schools up to par with the rest of the pack. I bet they were saving up for a time like this when they could strike while others are struggling.

User avatar
DoveBodyWash

Gold
Posts: 3177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by DoveBodyWash » Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:10 am

JCougar wrote:From a different thread:
MikeSpivey wrote:My guess is that they may have just received a very large unrestricted "gift" and perhaps see this as a strategic year to use it since there likely will be a good deal of losers and only a few winners in the admissions arms race. Indeed, I think it is possible they have had a reserve budget for just this opportunity and perhaps now have decided to employ it, based on the data they have. This is purely guess-work by me but this might be the strategic thinking...
I think Spivey might be on to something here. I'll go further. This move will totally fuck with other schools, who are currently walking a tightrope with their budgets/medians in admitting students. WUSTL isn't the only splitter school in the 19-30 range. GW, Minnesota and Indiana have nearly identical admissions practices (the former being fierce competitors), and the California schools (UCLA/USC) have gotten a lot more splitter-friendly lately. And as the life of the splitter school goes, your target medians are a few withdrawals away from total collapse. If this move poaches matriculants from these other schools, it could really throw a wrench in to their gears.

The greater university has a massive endowment, especially when controlled for the number of students and the STL cost of living. It has long been a goal of the Medical School (ranked #1 in the nation as near as 5 years ago) and the greater university to get the law and business schools up to par with the rest of the pack. I bet they were saving up for a time like this when they could strike while others are struggling.
Image

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”