That's above-median (almost 75th) GPA at Cornell and 25th percentile LSAT. If they already hit their LSAT target, your GPA might be enough for some money. You won't know unless you push the issue though.Green317 wrote:Ha! I will try not to be one! Although I am not sure if my numbers are especially valuable...166/3.75 (with some stellar softs, although they don't really factor in at this point).MarkinKansasCity wrote:Don't be a sucker. 166/3.25 = Full Ride at WUSTL this year. Your numbers may be more valuable than you realize this year.
WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 329
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
never hurts to ask, the worst they can say is no.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nonsense. Your numbers are very valuable. If you really want T14 then consider re-taking/re-applying with a higher score. It would be unfortunate to waste that GPA on sticker when you could go to T20 for free or wait a year and go T14 with moneyGreen317 wrote: Although I am not sure if my numbers are especially valuable...166/3.75 (with some stellar softs, although they don't really factor in at this point).
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Well, re-taking and re-applying aren't options that I'd like to pursue....I am not getting any younger (I'm not sure if I'd count as "non-traditional" but I will be significantly older than the average law student, wherever I go).
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Low-T14 at sticker is definitely hard to justify, although I wonder what I will say in 20 years...will I wish I had taken the plunge, so that my career would be better by the point (assuming it would be better)? Or will I still be struggling to pay off the debt, and wishing I had just taken WUSTL's full ride and hopped on a bus to St. Louis?
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That's a valid point, but I worry about getting on the "retake train" and never getting off....say I retake and get some money at a low-T14. Then there will still be incentive to retake again to get more money. Or to get accepted into a higher-ranked T14. And then to retake again to try to get money from that higher-ranked T14. I could see how this could just never end. At some point, you need to be satisfied with the available options, even if those options could -- in theory -- be better with improved with a retake. And all that is assuming that a retake will definitely result in a score increase, which is a dubious proposition.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
- Homelandsagreatshow
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:19 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I dunno if this has been brought up, but where does this thread compare to recent threads, size-wise?
385+ pages has to be getting up there, right?
385+ pages has to be getting up there, right?
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Last year's WUSTL thread capped at like 97 or something if i remember correctly....And yeah I think we're a few pages away from being the largest thread in this forum. We're already the biggest for this cycle.Homelandsagreatshow wrote:I dunno if this has been brought up, but where does this thread compare to recent threads, size-wise?
385+ pages has to be getting up there, right?
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I will change it if we successfully poach WokeUpInACar from UT.sublime wrote:Homelandsagreatshow wrote:I dunno if this has been brought up, but where does this thread compare to recent threads, size-wise?
385+ pages has to be getting up there, right?
Well, since it is no longer the "Best (never of the first page)" it isn't even real.
Why did we change that again? Can we reinstate that? lol
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 1&t=211412
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
just got in off the WL today.
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 12:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Nope. Just signed a lease at a nice modest place here http://www.yorkhousestl.com/jdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
Congrats catalina!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Trying to decide if i wanna get maid servicejdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Haha. That looks nicer than modest.Dolphine wrote:Nope. Just signed a lease at a nice modest place here http://www.yorkhousestl.com/jdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
Congrats catalina!
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm going to be in STL on Thursday so I bought Diamond Box tickets for Cards Cubs. I never spent 160 before on a baseball ticket so God willing the weather is nice.sublime wrote:lolcusenation wrote:Trying to decide if i wanna get maid servicejdmonkey wrote:Has anybody bought anything fun or unusual since getting the full ride?
I bought a bottle of Stoli. Not "nice" or "unusual" but certainly higher shelf than I typically go.
What about you jdmonkey?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks. I'm looking forward to it.sublime wrote:Nice man.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
From a different thread:
The greater university has a massive endowment, especially when controlled for the number of students and the STL cost of living. It has long been a goal of the Medical School (ranked #1 in the nation as near as 5 years ago) and the greater university to get the law and business schools up to par with the rest of the pack. I bet they were saving up for a time like this when they could strike while others are struggling.
I think Spivey might be on to something here. I'll go further. This move will totally fuck with other schools, who are currently walking a tightrope with their budgets/medians in admitting students. WUSTL isn't the only splitter school in the 19-30 range. GW, Minnesota and Indiana have nearly identical admissions practices (the former being fierce competitors), and the California schools (UCLA/USC) have gotten a lot more splitter-friendly lately. And as the life of the splitter school goes, your target medians are a few withdrawals away from total collapse. If this move poaches matriculants from these other schools, it could really throw a wrench in to their gears.MikeSpivey wrote:My guess is that they may have just received a very large unrestricted "gift" and perhaps see this as a strategic year to use it since there likely will be a good deal of losers and only a few winners in the admissions arms race. Indeed, I think it is possible they have had a reserve budget for just this opportunity and perhaps now have decided to employ it, based on the data they have. This is purely guess-work by me but this might be the strategic thinking...
The greater university has a massive endowment, especially when controlled for the number of students and the STL cost of living. It has long been a goal of the Medical School (ranked #1 in the nation as near as 5 years ago) and the greater university to get the law and business schools up to par with the rest of the pack. I bet they were saving up for a time like this when they could strike while others are struggling.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
JCougar wrote:From a different thread:
I think Spivey might be on to something here. I'll go further. This move will totally fuck with other schools, who are currently walking a tightrope with their budgets/medians in admitting students. WUSTL isn't the only splitter school in the 19-30 range. GW, Minnesota and Indiana have nearly identical admissions practices (the former being fierce competitors), and the California schools (UCLA/USC) have gotten a lot more splitter-friendly lately. And as the life of the splitter school goes, your target medians are a few withdrawals away from total collapse. If this move poaches matriculants from these other schools, it could really throw a wrench in to their gears.MikeSpivey wrote:My guess is that they may have just received a very large unrestricted "gift" and perhaps see this as a strategic year to use it since there likely will be a good deal of losers and only a few winners in the admissions arms race. Indeed, I think it is possible they have had a reserve budget for just this opportunity and perhaps now have decided to employ it, based on the data they have. This is purely guess-work by me but this might be the strategic thinking...
The greater university has a massive endowment, especially when controlled for the number of students and the STL cost of living. It has long been a goal of the Medical School (ranked #1 in the nation as near as 5 years ago) and the greater university to get the law and business schools up to par with the rest of the pack. I bet they were saving up for a time like this when they could strike while others are struggling.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login