sancho wrote:
And does anyone know the 1L salary for K&L Gates? It's coming up blank.
Holland's Portland office is not even showing up in the search results...
^ ?
sancho wrote:
And does anyone know the 1L salary for K&L Gates? It's coming up blank.
Holland's Portland office is not even showing up in the search results...
K&L would pay around 100k, I'd imagine.sancho wrote:sancho wrote:
And does anyone know the 1L salary for K&L Gates? It's coming up blank.
Holland's Portland office is not even showing up in the search results...
^ ?
rinkrat wrote:
A NALP search gives me two outliers at the high end:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe - $145k (only 7 lawyers in Portland office)
Marten Law - $127.5k (Enviro/Energy boutique)
The rest of Portland "biglaw":
Perkins Coie - $115k
Stoel Rives - $115k
Davis Wright Tremaine - $110k
Lane Powell - $110k
Klarquist Sparkman - $105k
Miller Nash - $105k
Tonkon Torp - $105k
I'd think more than that if Orrick is at $145k.deputydog wrote:
K&L would pay around 100k, I'd imagine.
Fair enough. I would be surprised if they are an outlier though. They have no incentive to pay that much, and I don't know why Orrick pays that high. Its a tiny office too, I would be surprised if they bring on a new associate annually.sancho wrote:rinkrat wrote:
A NALP search gives me two outliers at the high end:
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe - $145k (only 7 lawyers in Portland office)
Marten Law - $127.5k (Enviro/Energy boutique)
The rest of Portland "biglaw":
Perkins Coie - $115k
Stoel Rives - $115k
Davis Wright Tremaine - $110k
Lane Powell - $110k
Klarquist Sparkman - $105k
Miller Nash - $105k
Tonkon Torp - $105k
I'd think more than that if Orrick is at $145k.deputydog wrote:
K&L would pay around 100k, I'd imagine.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
The historical information is very interesting. Thanks.bobbypin wrote:Lewis and Clark 2013-14 tuition: $39,326
This is a 3% increase over last year.
Welcome news because tuition increased by approx. 9% annually between 2010 & 2012.
2010 tuition: $31,984
2011 tuition: $35,098
2012 tuition: $38,180
2013 tuition: $39,326
I want to know what they blew money on, which lead to them needing to raise tuition 8 grand in 3 years.sancho wrote:The historical information is very interesting. Thanks.bobbypin wrote:Lewis and Clark 2013-14 tuition: $39,326
This is a 3% increase over last year.
Welcome news because tuition increased by approx. 9% annually between 2010 & 2012.
2010 tuition: $31,984
2011 tuition: $35,098
2012 tuition: $38,180
2013 tuition: $39,326
They are wise to not go into the 40s at this time.
Imagine if you were a 1L in 2010 with a $10k annual scholarship.deputydog wrote:sancho wrote:The historical information is very interesting. Thanks.bobbypin wrote:Lewis and Clark 2013-14 tuition: $39,326
This is a 3% increase over last year.
Welcome news because tuition increased by approx. 9% annually between 2010 & 2012.
2010 tuition: $31,984
2011 tuition: $35,098
2012 tuition: $38,180
2013 tuition: $39,326
They are wise to not go into the 40s at this time.
I want to know what they blew money on, which lead to them needing to raise tuition 8 grand in 3 years.
Those prices are criminal. UO and Willamette should both close down. It would make L&C much more competitive, and job outcomes would be better. The fact that these three places charge this much for a ~40% chance at a job is insane.bobbypin wrote:It is not just Lewis and Clark, the other two Oregon law schools had significant tuition increases as well. What is troubling is there is no corresponding increase to scholarship medians offered.
Willamette tuition:
2008: $27,495
2009: $28,330
2010: $29,680
2011: $31,130
2012: $34,570
University of Oregon tuition:
2008: $19,596
2009: $20,570
2010: $22,328
2011: $24,031
2012: $28,354 (almost an 18% increase from the year prior!!)
From 2008 to 2012, Oregon increased tuition by $8758, Willamette increased tuition by $7075, and Lewis and Clark increased tuition by $9146.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Maybe it's because people are rethinking attending this school?sancho wrote:The disparity in activity of this year's thread versus that of last year is astonishing.
Just a quieter group? Fewer applicants? Both?
Has anyone noticed if this phenomenon is occurring in the c/o threads of other schools?
Yeah I'm shocked how far they dropped in one year. Biggest drop for any school ranked in the top 100 that I can see. Portland is just such a small legal marketbobbypin wrote:Maybe it's because people are rethinking attending this school?sancho wrote:The disparity in activity of this year's thread versus that of last year is astonishing.
Just a quieter group? Fewer applicants? Both?
Has anyone noticed if this phenomenon is occurring in the c/o threads of other schools?
2013 USNWR ranking: 58
2014 USNWR ranking: 80
According to the above, only 27.5% of students were employed at graduation.
It's shocking.BlazersTime wrote:Yeah I'm shocked how far they dropped in one year. Biggest drop for any school ranked in the top 100 that I can see. Portland is just such a small legal marketbobbypin wrote:Maybe it's because people are rethinking attending this school?sancho wrote:The disparity in activity of this year's thread versus that of last year is astonishing.
Just a quieter group? Fewer applicants? Both?
Has anyone noticed if this phenomenon is occurring in the c/o threads of other schools?
2013 USNWR ranking: 58
2014 USNWR ranking: 80
According to the above, only 27.5% of students were employed at graduation.
I'm curious if it is indeed L&C-specific or simply a result of the broader trend. I'll have to peruse the YOY c/o threads of other schools to obtain a better idea.bobbypin wrote:Maybe it's because people are rethinking attending this school?
2013 USNWR ranking: 58
2014 USNWR ranking: 80
According to the above, only 27.5% of students were employed at graduation.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
So employment #s are the single largest driver of these rankings? I understand the methodology is quite complex.BlazersTime wrote: Portland is just such a small legal market
What is going on here? Is the PNW faring that much worse than the rest of the nation? A few schools, I understand. But 5 out of 6 declining (and substantially at that) and the 6th not increasing in rank? Very weird.bobbypin wrote:
It's shocking.
All of the Pacific NW schools dropped in rankings with the exception of Gonzaga.
UW from 20 to 28
Lewis and Clark from 58 to 80
U of O from 82 to 94
Seattle from 82 to 102
Gonzaga stayed at 113
Willamette from 129 to no published rank
Yikes.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
wow. that is depressing.sancho wrote:It looks like employed at graduation is only 4%. Employed 9 months after graduation is another 14%. There is a lot more to the drop than these figures.
Credit goes to Regulus:JPR57 wrote:Where did you find the breakdown for these numbers? (4% at graduation and 14% 9 months later).
I agree: these numbers are incredible!
Sorry if I wasn't clear. I meant 4% and 14% toward the USNWR ranking. Those are not the actual employment figures.cbarlow1016 wrote:wow. that is depressing.sancho wrote:It looks like employed at graduation is only 4%. Employed 9 months after graduation is another 14%. There is a lot more to the drop than these figures.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login