wbrother wrote:What are your numbers?nolongermissing wrote:Yesseancris wrote:Seems like those reporting here have admit numbers. Anyone who would consider Wake a "reach" based on numbers have the 12/10 mailing update?
163/3.08
wbrother wrote:What are your numbers?nolongermissing wrote:Yesseancris wrote:Seems like those reporting here have admit numbers. Anyone who would consider Wake a "reach" based on numbers have the 12/10 mailing update?
Traditional applicant? Either way, your numbers can still get you an acceptance. Let's all hope for the best. We'll know what this is within a week.nolongermissing wrote:wbrother wrote:What are your numbers?nolongermissing wrote:Yesseancris wrote:Seems like those reporting here have admit numbers. Anyone who would consider Wake a "reach" based on numbers have the 12/10 mailing update?
163/3.08
Yeah I'd say I'm a traditional applicant. I mean, I consider myself a little more impressive than my pedestrian numbers-- but I'm a little biaswbrother wrote:
Traditional applicant? Either way, your numbers can still get you an acceptance. Let's all hope for the best. We'll know what this is within a week.
I'm not as much of a numbers guy as everyone else. I know law schools focus on them a lot more than they admit and I understand that better numbers give a person a better chance. But I think the truth is somewhere in between a "holistic review" of all aspects of an application and placing everyone's stats in a spreadsheet and taking the top 1000.nolongermissing wrote:Yeah I'd say I'm a traditional applicant. I mean, I consider myself a little more impressive than my pedestrian numbers-- but I'm a little biaswbrother wrote:
Traditional applicant? Either way, your numbers can still get you an acceptance. Let's all hope for the best. We'll know what this is within a week.
wbrother wrote:I'm not as much of a numbers guy as everyone else. I know law schools focus on them a lot more than they admit and I understand that better numbers give a person a better chance. But I think the truth is somewhere in between a "holistic review" of all aspects of an application and placing everyone's stats in a spreadsheet and taking the top 1000.nolongermissing wrote:Yeah I'd say I'm a traditional applicant. I mean, I consider myself a little more impressive than my pedestrian numbers-- but I'm a little biaswbrother wrote:
Traditional applicant? Either way, your numbers can still get you an acceptance. Let's all hope for the best. We'll know what this is within a week.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Ask and ye shall receive!danitt wrote:Wouldn't it be fun if Dean Shively responded and put us out of our misery?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Yes. I did not enjoy the interview at all. Ugh.jduluoz54 wrote:Submitted my interview this evening. Anyone else?
Did mine this morning. Not my favorite thing to do.1693 wrote:Yes. I did not enjoy the interview at all. Ugh.jduluoz54 wrote:Submitted my interview this evening. Anyone else?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login