William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:43 pm

2012Lsatscore wrote:Black Tuesday guys. See you tomorrow.

Not necessarily, I dunno where you got the noon time, but here's what I found:

2012 - 2:04 pm Eastern
2011 - 1:23 pm Eastern
2010 - 4:14 pm Eastern

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=164588&start=1300
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133047&start=2075
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=92657&start=1750

User avatar
2012Lsatscore
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 2012Lsatscore » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:51 pm

.
Last edited by 2012Lsatscore on Wed Jun 12, 2013 1:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:56 pm

Right yeah, I don't think it will be today. But, I mean, look at the times in that thread, granted I was just saying 2 hours later which is just about passed anyways, but is there a chance you don't have the forum set to the right time (I didn't for a while and was an hour off).

User avatar
2012Lsatscore
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 2012Lsatscore » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:56 pm

.
Last edited by 2012Lsatscore on Wed Jun 12, 2013 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:58 pm

Is the time in this post the time right now. It's like right here----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^

User avatar
2012Lsatscore
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 2012Lsatscore » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:59 pm

.
Last edited by 2012Lsatscore on Wed Jun 12, 2013 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:31 am

I thought W&M didn't employ graduates? Or at least it didn't for the 2011 class. Now for the 2012 class there is a huge increase in full time, long term, bar required jobs (55% up to 74%), but it looks like 41 of those are funded by the university? That drops the number to 53%...

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/docume ... ummary.pdf

Why does W&M have such terrible numbers? Richmond has better employment numbers!

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2379
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby lhanvt13 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:51 am

ironbmike wrote:I thought W&M didn't employ graduates? Or at least it didn't for the 2011 class. Now for the 2012 class there is a huge increase in full time, long term, bar required jobs (55% up to 74%), but it looks like 41 of those are funded by the university? That drops the number to 53%...

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/docume ... ummary.pdf

Why does W&M have such terrible numbers? Richmond has better employment numbers!

Where are you getting ur school funded? It says 0 for me

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:52 am

lhanvt13 wrote:
ironbmike wrote:I thought W&M didn't employ graduates? Or at least it didn't for the 2011 class. Now for the 2012 class there is a huge increase in full time, long term, bar required jobs (55% up to 74%), but it looks like 41 of those are funded by the university? That drops the number to 53%...

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/docume ... ummary.pdf

Why does W&M have such terrible numbers? Richmond has better employment numbers!

Where are you getting ur school funded? It says 0 for me

He incorrectly linked the wrong report

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/employ ... /index.php

User avatar
InBetweenDays
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby InBetweenDays » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:54 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:
ironbmike wrote:I thought W&M didn't employ graduates? Or at least it didn't for the 2011 class. Now for the 2012 class there is a huge increase in full time, long term, bar required jobs (55% up to 74%), but it looks like 41 of those are funded by the university? That drops the number to 53%...

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/docume ... ummary.pdf

Why does W&M have such terrible numbers? Richmond has better employment numbers!

Where are you getting ur school funded? It says 0 for me

He incorrectly linked the wrong report

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/employ ... /index.php


US News 2014 Report says that 21% of graduates are employed at university funded positions after graduation.

User avatar
lhanvt13
Posts: 2379
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby lhanvt13 » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:55 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:
ironbmike wrote:I thought W&M didn't employ graduates? Or at least it didn't for the 2011 class. Now for the 2012 class there is a huge increase in full time, long term, bar required jobs (55% up to 74%), but it looks like 41 of those are funded by the university? That drops the number to 53%...

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/docume ... ummary.pdf

Why does W&M have such terrible numbers? Richmond has better employment numbers!

Where are you getting ur school funded? It says 0 for me

He incorrectly linked the wrong report

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/employ ... /index.php

Good Jesus that's a lot

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:14 am

lhanvt13 wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:
lhanvt13 wrote:
ironbmike wrote:I thought W&M didn't employ graduates? Or at least it didn't for the 2011 class. Now for the 2012 class there is a huge increase in full time, long term, bar required jobs (55% up to 74%), but it looks like 41 of those are funded by the university? That drops the number to 53%...

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/docume ... ummary.pdf

Why does W&M have such terrible numbers? Richmond has better employment numbers!

Where are you getting ur school funded? It says 0 for me

He incorrectly linked the wrong report

http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/employ ... /index.php

Good Jesus that's a lot


Sorry yeah meant to link this one: http://law.wm.edu/careerservices/docume ... 0FINAL.pdf

I mean, 53%? That worries me.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:19 am

Thanks for pointing that out (by the way Richmond does NOT have better numbers).

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:24 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:Thanks for pointing that out (by the way Richmond does NOT have better numbers).


Not by much, but I think they're at 59%. However W&M has a much larger regional pull whereas Richmond is very local.

User avatar
InBetweenDays
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby InBetweenDays » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:28 am

ironbmike wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:Thanks for pointing that out (by the way Richmond does NOT have better numbers).


Not by much, but I think they're at 59%. However W&M has a much larger regional pull whereas Richmond is very local.


Opinion of national reach for Wake as compared to W&M?

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:29 am

ironbmike wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:Thanks for pointing that out (by the way Richmond does NOT have better numbers).


Not by much, but I think they're at 59%. However W&M has a much larger regional pull whereas Richmond is very local.

Richmond hasn't released their class of 2012 data yet.

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:31 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:Thanks for pointing that out (by the way Richmond does NOT have better numbers).


Not by much, but I think they're at 59%. However W&M has a much larger regional pull whereas Richmond is very local.

Richmond hasn't released their class of 2012 data yet.


True. But I'm using 2011. W&M actually went down in 2012, perhaps Richmond did too.

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:32 am

InBetweenDays wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:Thanks for pointing that out (by the way Richmond does NOT have better numbers).


Not by much, but I think they're at 59%. However W&M has a much larger regional pull whereas Richmond is very local.


Opinion of national reach for Wake as compared to W&M?


Not sure, I haven't looked at Wake. W&M doesn't have a huge national pull but regionally it does. ~35% of grads end up in VA, and ~35% end up in the surrounding states.

bamdog
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:53 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby bamdog » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:33 am

InBetweenDays wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:Thanks for pointing that out (by the way Richmond does NOT have better numbers).


Not by much, but I think they're at 59%. However W&M has a much larger regional pull whereas Richmond is very local.


Opinion of national reach for Wake as compared to W&M?


i would say from all ive learned about wake it might be more of a southeast regional school, not so much of a national school. their admissions staff is very nice and they have a beautiful campus though if these things are important to you. but honestly im not sure how much of a national reach W&M really has either.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:36 am

ironbmike wrote:
True. But I'm using 2011. W&M actually went down in 2012, perhaps Richmond did too.

You're probably unaware of this, but for the Class of 2012 they change the way schools have to report their employment data. Where as for the class of 2011 they had the option for the old way vs new way. So it's not an increase in school funded jobs as just being accurately reported.

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:37 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
True. But I'm using 2011. W&M actually went down in 2012, perhaps Richmond did too.

You're probably unaware of this, but for the Class of 2012 they change the way schools have to report their employment data. Where as for the class of 2011 they had the option for the old way vs new way. So it's not an increase in school funded jobs as just being accurately reported.


Oh interesting. How does it affect the numbers? What is the change?

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:42 am

ironbmike wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
True. But I'm using 2011. W&M actually went down in 2012, perhaps Richmond did too.

You're probably unaware of this, but for the Class of 2012 they change the way schools have to report their employment data. Where as for the class of 2011 they had the option for the old way vs new way. So it's not an increase in school funded jobs as just being accurately reported.


Oh interesting. How does it affect the numbers? What is the change?

Well I mean, like you posted, they didn't have to post any information regarding school funded jobs last year. Where as this year they do. Also other data, like JD required, law firm size etc etc. More emphasis on full time long term legal jobs.

http://advisein.wordpress.com/2011/07/2 ... pplicants/

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:44 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
True. But I'm using 2011. W&M actually went down in 2012, perhaps Richmond did too.

You're probably unaware of this, but for the Class of 2012 they change the way schools have to report their employment data. Where as for the class of 2011 they had the option for the old way vs new way. So it's not an increase in school funded jobs as just being accurately reported.


Oh interesting. How does it affect the numbers? What is the change?

Well I mean, like you posted, they didn't have to post any information regarding school funded jobs last year. Where as this year they do. Also other data, like JD required, law firm size etc etc. More emphasis on full time long term legal jobs.

http://advisein.wordpress.com/2011/07/2 ... pplicants/


Ah yes I see. Well regardless, there are some really poor numbers out there.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:49 am

ironbmike wrote:
Ah yes I see. Well regardless, there are some really poor numbers out there.

Right, I was just shocked at the Richmond comment. Based on the USNWR data they aren't even close.

ironbmike
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: William & Mary c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ironbmike » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:58 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
ironbmike wrote:
Ah yes I see. Well regardless, there are some really poor numbers out there.

Right, I was just shocked at the Richmond comment. Based on the USNWR data they aren't even close.


I still think Richmond is higher, no? http://www.lstscorereports.com/?r=va

Either way it's splitting hairs.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”