So true- there is a chance though. Maybe these 167s won't accept. It's just the size of the class that makes me think usc will pull it offmcs268 wrote:Where's my WL acceptance?
if only i got one point higher to a 167..life sucks.
USC c/o 2016 Applicants Forum
- Dream Weave
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:39 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
This is me with UCLA- waitlisted with 167..if only i got 168. How about you convince UCLA to accept me of their WL and I'll WD from USC and tell them to give you my spot...!mcs268 wrote:Where's my WL acceptance?
if only i got one point higher to a 167..life sucks.
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
20k/year. so for admitted students off the WL.. what are our deadlines?
- radar714
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:35 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
its honestly pathetic that 1 point can make that much of a difference. I hate that these schools tout "holistic reviews" when there is so much data to prove otherwise. I mean I can understand how a 2 point differential could/should make a difference, but 1 more fucking question on the LSAT?Dream Weave wrote:So true- there is a chance though. Maybe these 167s won't accept. It's just the size of the class that makes me think usc will pull it offmcs268 wrote:Where's my WL acceptance?
if only i got one point higher to a 167..life sucks.
but I hope you're right Dream Weave, considering the Fin Aid website says that only 50% of the incoming class is on some form of merit aid and almost all the pre-deadline acceptances have had some merit package attached, even for those with 3.6-7/167. Hopefully us 166's can become a part of the half of the class that finances the merit-awards for the other half.
edit: spelling
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
if you had a 3.8+++ a 166 would have been just fine.radar714 wrote:its honestly pathetic that 1 point can make that much of a difference. I hate that these schools tout "holistic reviews" when there is so much data to prove otherwise. I mean I can understand how a 2 point differential could/should make a difference, but 1 more fucking question on the LSAT?Dream Weave wrote:So true- there is a chance though. Maybe these 167s won't accept. It's just the size of the class that makes me think usc will pull it offmcs268 wrote:Where's my WL acceptance?
if only i got one point higher to a 167..life sucks.
but I hope you're right Dream Weave, considering the Fin Aid website says that only 50% of the incoming class is on some form of merit aid and almost all the pre-deadline acceptances have had some merit package attached, even for those with 3.6-7/167. Hopefully us 166's can become a part of the half of the class that finances the merit-awards for the other half.
edit: spelling
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- radar714
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:35 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
#truthzman wrote: if you had a 3.8+++ a 166 would have been just fine.
but that would've taken more than 1 question haha
- Dream Weave
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
The sad thing is that not all 3.8s are equal. And going back to the holistic argument, I understand the 167 over the 166, but a 3.8 done half in community college is not impressive and yet it's seen better than a 3.6 from a top school. No one can truly think a 3.8 from a satellite school is difficult to get- you only need to show up and there is almost 0 competition. I took two classes at community college during the summer and it was criminal how easy the As were to get.
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:56 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
When I received my merit scholarship offer, they stated that my scholarship was possible through the generous donation of its alumni. With that said, as a contingency of my scholarship offer, I am required to write a letter of appreciation to my scholarship donator(s) if requested. This of course assumes the premise that the university can specifically match which student received money from which donator. Regardless, that was the message that was conveyed to me when I received merit $$.radar714 wrote:its honestly pathetic that 1 point can make that much of a difference. I hate that these schools tout "holistic reviews" when there is so much data to prove otherwise. I mean I can understand how a 2 point differential could/should make a difference, but 1 more fucking question on the LSAT?Dream Weave wrote:So true- there is a chance though. Maybe these 167s won't accept. It's just the size of the class that makes me think usc will pull it offmcs268 wrote:Where's my WL acceptance?
if only i got one point higher to a 167..life sucks.
but I hope you're right Dream Weave, considering the Fin Aid website says that only 50% of the incoming class is on some form of merit aid and almost all the pre-deadline acceptances have had some merit package attached, even for those with 3.6-7/167. Hopefully us 166's can become a part of the half of the class that finances the merit-awards for the other half.
edit: spelling
With that said, I don't think that the lower percentile students of the incoming class are necessarily financing the merit-awards for the other half. If I'm missing something here, please let me know.
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Jonathk1 wrote:When I received my merit scholarship offer, they stated that my scholarship was possible through the generous donation of its alumni. With that said, as a contingency of my scholarship offer, I am required to write a letter of appreciation to my scholarship donator(s) if requested. This of course assumes the premise that the university can specifically match which student received money from which donator. Regardless, that was the message that was conveyed to me when I received merit $$.radar714 wrote:its honestly pathetic that 1 point can make that much of a difference. I hate that these schools tout "holistic reviews" when there is so much data to prove otherwise. I mean I can understand how a 2 point differential could/should make a difference, but 1 more fucking question on the LSAT?Dream Weave wrote:So true- there is a chance though. Maybe these 167s won't accept. It's just the size of the class that makes me think usc will pull it offmcs268 wrote:Where's my WL acceptance?
if only i got one point higher to a 167..life sucks.
but I hope you're right Dream Weave, considering the Fin Aid website says that only 50% of the incoming class is on some form of merit aid and almost all the pre-deadline acceptances have had some merit package attached, even for those with 3.6-7/167. Hopefully us 166's can become a part of the half of the class that finances the merit-awards for the other half.
edit: spelling
With that said, I don't think that the lower percentile students of the incoming class are necessarily financing the merit-awards for the other half. If I'm missing something here, please let me know.
ahahah you dont know much about law school financing. low GPA/LSAT go at STICKER to pay for the merits..alumni donations are a small part of financing.
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:56 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Yes, I don't know much about law school financing. That's why I asked.zman wrote:
ahahah you dont know much about law school financing. low GPA/LSAT go at STICKER to pay for the merits..alumni donations are a small part of financing.
I'm sure law schools do not publicize what you say is a fact. Where can I find that information?
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I don't know what the best source is but it's very simple. I summed it all up when I said "GPA/LSAT go at STICKER to pay for the merits". There is not much more to it. I think Stanford, Harvard and Yale are the only schools that do not practice this.Jonathk1 wrote:Yes, I don't know much about law school financing. That's why I asked.zman wrote:
ahahah you dont know much about law school financing. low GPA/LSAT go at STICKER to pay for the merits..alumni donations are a small part of financing.
I'm sure law schools do not publicize what you say is a fact. Where can I find that information?
- tocheer67
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:46 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
167 LSAT and still sitting on the Waitlist.
- radar714
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:35 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
For those of you that got pulled off the waitlist, how long did they give you to respond/deposit before the offer expires?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:39 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
The first deposit deadline on mine was May 10th (Friday). aka not enough time.radar714 wrote:For those of you that got pulled off the waitlist, how long did they give you to respond/deposit before the offer expires?
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Asked for extension?
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Crossing my fingers I get out of CR2 this week!
- acs507
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:38 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Yup, I'm at 167 and still stuck in CR2.jdmonkey wrote:Crossing my fingers I get out of CR2 this week!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 10:53 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
guessing no one got in off the waitlist today?
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:03 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I wouldn't expect them to release anymore until after Friday (the deposit deadline for these new WL admits). It's strange that there appears to be some 167s still on the WL, so I'd expect if any more offers are made they will go to these 167s on Monday..owells wrote:guessing no one got in off the waitlist today?
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
if only there was a way to find out how many total committed. according to the FB page it's about 25-30 but many won't show up on FB until the school year starts..
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:56 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
What FB page are you referring to? We have our 2016 group with about 70-80 members right now.zman wrote:if only there was a way to find out how many total committed. according to the FB page it's about 25-30 but many won't show up on FB until the school year starts..
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Maybe they are reviewing the files of the people they gave fee waivers to last because we never paid to have our applications read. Perhaps USC gave first priority to the people who actually forked up the cash to apply?acs507 wrote:Yup, I'm at 167 and still stuck in CR2.jdmonkey wrote:Crossing my fingers I get out of CR2 this week!
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Interesting theoryjdmonkey wrote:Maybe they are reviewing the files of the people they gave fee waivers to last because we never paid to have our applications read. Perhaps USC gave first priority to the people who actually forked up the cash to apply?acs507 wrote:Yup, I'm at 167 and still stuck in CR2.jdmonkey wrote:Crossing my fingers I get out of CR2 this week!
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
a lot of those people have not committed and many will end up at other schools.Jonathk1 wrote:What FB page are you referring to? We have our 2016 group with about 70-80 members right now.zman wrote:if only there was a way to find out how many total committed. according to the FB page it's about 25-30 but many won't show up on FB until the school year starts..
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 11:35 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Went into Final Review today. Never thought I would see that. Its only been a small eternity since applying...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login