USC c/o 2016 Applicants Forum
- anteater1
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
So on average it's between 3-4 weeks from CR1 > CR2 based on the small sample size of this thread....
With my CR1 date of 2/12 I should be hearing back pretty soon (not going to even bother getting my hopes up though)
With my CR1 date of 2/12 I should be hearing back pretty soon (not going to even bother getting my hopes up though)
- Ramius
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
MAYBE that's the average, but if it is, my numbers are bringing down someone who found out very, very quickly.anteater1 wrote:So on average it's between 3-4 weeks from CR1 > CR2 based on the small sample size of this thread....
With my CR1 date of 2/12 I should be hearing back pretty soon (not going to even bother getting my hopes up though)
- anteater1
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
purely anecdotal, and I'm not sure I understand your meaningmatthewsean85 wrote:MAYBE that's the average, but if it is, my numbers are bringing down someone who found out very, very quickly.anteater1 wrote:So on average it's between 3-4 weeks from CR1 > CR2 based on the small sample size of this thread....
With my CR1 date of 2/12 I should be hearing back pretty soon (not going to even bother getting my hopes up though)
- Ramius
- Posts: 2018
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:39 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
It is entirely anecdotal, I was mostly just complaining. I've been CR1 since 1/14, after going complete mid-November and have seen no movement since then. And numbers are fairly competitive.anteater1 wrote:purely anecdotal, and I'm not sure I understand your meaningmatthewsean85 wrote:MAYBE that's the average, but if it is, my numbers are bringing down someone who found out very, very quickly.anteater1 wrote:So on average it's between 3-4 weeks from CR1 > CR2 based on the small sample size of this thread....
With my CR1 date of 2/12 I should be hearing back pretty soon (not going to even bother getting my hopes up though)
USC is one of the last two schools I am waiting for a decision from, and considering my original applications were submitted beginning of October (took me awhile to get Dean's Certification for a minor conduct offense, hence the complete mid-November), I'm just tired of waiting.
- acs507
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:38 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I feel like there's just no way to guesstimate with USC. I've been on CR2 since 2/14 but others here back within a week of being on CR2...anteater1 wrote:So on average it's between 3-4 weeks from CR1 > CR2 based on the small sample size of this thread....
With my CR1 date of 2/12 I should be hearing back pretty soon (not going to even bother getting my hopes up though)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I've been on CR2 since 1/25 so I feel your pain. USC is the only school I applied to for which lsn predicted an 'admit' decision, so I'm really confused about what is going on.acs507 wrote:I feel like there's just no way to guesstimate with USC. I've been on CR2 since 2/14 but others here back within a week of being on CR2...anteater1 wrote:So on average it's between 3-4 weeks from CR1 > CR2 based on the small sample size of this thread....
With my CR1 date of 2/12 I should be hearing back pretty soon (not going to even bother getting my hopes up though)
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:35 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Is it true that you can email the admissions office and ask to receive a decision by the end of March at the cost of waiving the chance to be WL'd?
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:50 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I've been "Complete" since 1/27... Does the lack or CR translate to automatic rejection? Stop leading me on, USC!
- Charlie.Home
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
yes.kaydee wrote:I've been "Complete" since 1/27... Does the lack or CR translate to automatic rejection? Stop leading me on, USC!
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 2:50 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Why haven't I received a rejection yet then?Charlie.Home wrote:yes.kaydee wrote:I've been "Complete" since 1/27... Does the lack or CR translate to automatic rejection? Stop leading me on, USC!
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I don't think it's or sure you are rejected. they could waitlist you depending on your stats and other things.kaydee wrote:Why haven't I received a rejection yet then?Charlie.Home wrote:yes.kaydee wrote:I've been "Complete" since 1/27... Does the lack or CR translate to automatic rejection? Stop leading me on, USC!
- Homelandsagreatshow
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 4:19 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Complete sinceee 1/11
- xiaojimu
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
yes, according to my sources.FringeFan wrote:Is it true that you can email the admissions office and ask to receive a decision by the end of March at the cost of waiving the chance to be WL'd?
but you should always check with the office.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Officially got the Rothman ding.
- pannekoeken
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:07 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
+1.amonthofsundays wrote:Officially got the Rothman ding.
It says they had 140 applicants... that is a LOT considering the fact that their class size usually hovers around 180, no?
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
where does it say they had 140 applicants?pannekoeken wrote:+1.amonthofsundays wrote:Officially got the Rothman ding.
It says they had 140 applicants... that is a LOT considering the fact that their class size usually hovers around 180, no?
- boblawlob
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I'd say only 20% of those applicants will end up at USC.pannekoeken wrote:+1.amonthofsundays wrote:Officially got the Rothman ding.
It says they had 140 applicants... that is a LOT considering the fact that their class size usually hovers around 180, no?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
less than 20%. rothman candidates are accepted by top 10 schools. most of them.boblawlob wrote:I'd say only 20% of those applicants will end up at USC.pannekoeken wrote:+1.amonthofsundays wrote:Officially got the Rothman ding.
It says they had 140 applicants... that is a LOT considering the fact that their class size usually hovers around 180, no?
- pannekoeken
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:07 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Oh, no doubt. But I still think that is a lot of applicants for one measly spot, especially considering the fact that USC is a small school.zman wrote:less than 20%. rothman candidates are accepted by top 10 schools. most of them.boblawlob wrote:I'd say only 20% of those applicants will end up at USC.pannekoeken wrote:+1.amonthofsundays wrote:Officially got the Rothman ding.
It says they had 140 applicants... that is a LOT considering the fact that their class size usually hovers around 180, no?
- thatgumyoulike
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Could someone elaborate on exactly what is being suggested here? I've been complete since 1/14 and nothing since. Is this suggesting I'm going to get dinged or waitlisted?zman wrote:I don't think it's or sure you are rejected. they could waitlist you depending on your stats and other things.kaydee wrote:Why haven't I received a rejection yet then?Charlie.Home wrote:yes.kaydee wrote:I've been "Complete" since 1/27... Does the lack or CR translate to automatic rejection? Stop leading me on, USC!
Last edited by thatgumyoulike on Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- megagnarley
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
For what it's worth, thought I'd share a bit of insight into my dealings with USC Law thus far.
Even being a USC undergrad alum, I didn't think I could ever see myself spending another three years there for law school, due in no small part to my desire for a change in scenery and my desire to go T-14.
Having gone to two events over the past few days, however, one for admitted students and one for admitted Trojans, I've simply been blown away by the hospitality and accessibility of current students, alumni, and faculty alike. Be it the charming dean of admissions, the dedicated alumni (managing partners at firms none the less) giving their personal contact info out to prospective students, or the dean of the school himself hosting an event at his home and writing a personal follow up email touching on a previous conversation, there is every indication that the intimate atmosphere so boasted about by USC law, is in fact, a reality.
Granted, I am not oblivious to the fact that they are trying to sell the school as well, but even the manner in which they do that is so sincere and personalized compared to their cross town rivals.
Take that for what it's worth. I'm no USC booster, and there is still a good chance that I'll end up elsewhere come this fall. But I do think the type of effort and sincerity I've witnessed thus far should be of interest to other prospectives who don't live in LA and haven't had the opportunity of attending first hand.
That is all.
ETA: completely outing myself with this email, but hey, I have nothing to hide.
Even being a USC undergrad alum, I didn't think I could ever see myself spending another three years there for law school, due in no small part to my desire for a change in scenery and my desire to go T-14.
Having gone to two events over the past few days, however, one for admitted students and one for admitted Trojans, I've simply been blown away by the hospitality and accessibility of current students, alumni, and faculty alike. Be it the charming dean of admissions, the dedicated alumni (managing partners at firms none the less) giving their personal contact info out to prospective students, or the dean of the school himself hosting an event at his home and writing a personal follow up email touching on a previous conversation, there is every indication that the intimate atmosphere so boasted about by USC law, is in fact, a reality.
Granted, I am not oblivious to the fact that they are trying to sell the school as well, but even the manner in which they do that is so sincere and personalized compared to their cross town rivals.
Take that for what it's worth. I'm no USC booster, and there is still a good chance that I'll end up elsewhere come this fall. But I do think the type of effort and sincerity I've witnessed thus far should be of interest to other prospectives who don't live in LA and haven't had the opportunity of attending first hand.
That is all.
ETA: completely outing myself with this email, but hey, I have nothing to hide.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
amonthofsundays wrote:Officially got the Rothman ding.
Was this via email or snail mail?
- uconjak
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
I felt the same way, the folks at USC went out of their way to be friendly. Even the students came up to me and asked me if i was interested in usc law and talked to me about it.megagnarley wrote:For what it's worth, thought I'd share a bit of insight into my dealings with USC Law thus far.
Even being a USC undergrad alum, I didn't think I could ever see myself spending another three years there for law school, due in no small part to my desire for a change in scenery and my desire to go T-14.
Having gone to two events over the past few days, however, one for admitted students and one for admitted Trojans, I've simply been blown away by the hospitality and accessibility of current students, alumni, and faculty alike. Be it the charming dean of admissions, the dedicated alumni (managing partners at firms none the less) giving their personal contact info out to prospective students, or the dean of the school himself hosting an event at his home and writing a personal follow up email touching on a previous conversation, there is every indication that the intimate atmosphere so boasted about by USC law, is in fact, a reality.
Granted, I am not oblivious to the fact that they are trying to sell the school as well, but even the manner in which they do that is so sincere and personalized compared to their cross town rivals.
Take that for what it's worth. I'm no USC booster, and there is still a good chance that I'll end up elsewhere come this fall. But I do think the type of effort and sincerity I've witnessed thus far should be of interest to other prospectives who don't live in LA and haven't had the opportunity of attending first hand.
That is all.
ETA: completely outing myself with this email, but hey, I have nothing to hide.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
Just curious- how many of those types of get togethers have you gone to for other schools?megagnarley wrote:For what it's worth, thought I'd share a bit of insight into my dealings with USC Law thus far.
Even being a USC undergrad alum, I didn't think I could ever see myself spending another three years there for law school, due in no small part to my desire for a change in scenery and my desire to go T-14.
Having gone to two events over the past few days, however, one for admitted students and one for admitted Trojans, I've simply been blown away by the hospitality and accessibility of current students, alumni, and faculty alike. Be it the charming dean of admissions, the dedicated alumni (managing partners at firms none the less) giving their personal contact info out to prospective students, or the dean of the school himself hosting an event at his home and writing a personal follow up email touching on a previous conversation, there is every indication that the intimate atmosphere so boasted about by USC law, is in fact, a reality.
Granted, I am not oblivious to the fact that they are trying to sell the school as well, but even the manner in which they do that is so sincere and personalized compared to their cross town rivals.
Take that for what it's worth. I'm no USC booster, and there is still a good chance that I'll end up elsewhere come this fall. But I do think the type of effort and sincerity I've witnessed thus far should be of interest to other prospectives who don't live in LA and haven't had the opportunity of attending first hand.
That is all.
ETA: completely outing myself with this email, but hey, I have nothing to hide.
- megagnarley
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: USC c/o 2016 Applicants
0. Because none of the other Deans have invited me to their house. Thanks for making my point for me.BigZuck wrote:Just curious- how many of those types of get togethers have you gone to for other schools?megagnarley wrote:For what it's worth, thought I'd share a bit of insight into my dealings with USC Law thus far.
Even being a USC undergrad alum, I didn't think I could ever see myself spending another three years there for law school, due in no small part to my desire for a change in scenery and my desire to go T-14.
Having gone to two events over the past few days, however, one for admitted students and one for admitted Trojans, I've simply been blown away by the hospitality and accessibility of current students, alumni, and faculty alike. Be it the charming dean of admissions, the dedicated alumni (managing partners at firms none the less) giving their personal contact info out to prospective students, or the dean of the school himself hosting an event at his home and writing a personal follow up email touching on a previous conversation, there is every indication that the intimate atmosphere so boasted about by USC law, is in fact, a reality.
Granted, I am not oblivious to the fact that they are trying to sell the school as well, but even the manner in which they do that is so sincere and personalized compared to their cross town rivals.
Take that for what it's worth. I'm no USC booster, and there is still a good chance that I'll end up elsewhere come this fall. But I do think the type of effort and sincerity I've witnessed thus far should be of interest to other prospectives who don't live in LA and haven't had the opportunity of attending first hand.
That is all.
ETA: completely outing myself with this email, but hey, I have nothing to hide.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login