You literally have to be one of the 2 worse students in the school to get below a 2.5 and at that point, just drop out.jbagelboy wrote:at ASW they made it clear it was literally impossible to sink below 2.5reyals wrote:28k/yr or 84k over 3 years on 2.5 gpa stipulation. That's a negligible stipulation, right?
Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
If they pull more low numbers at sticker and offer more rides to high numbers they could keep their medians, although all these 166s imply otherwise.BitterSplitter wrote:I'm extremely curious to know what you TLSers think the implications of this strategy would be? Not only rankings wiseminnbills wrote:FWIW one of my profs told me they are upping the class size this year, taking the revenue over high medians. So I would expect medians to drop this year.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I think MN recognized the ubiquitous median slip that is about to happen and is just one of the first schools to set new, realistic goals based on that information.
It feels like a lot of other schools are trying wildly weird tactics to save their medians as much as possible (see G-town's ridiculous scholarship goings-on and UVA's full-ride lottery).
It feels like a lot of other schools are trying wildly weird tactics to save their medians as much as possible (see G-town's ridiculous scholarship goings-on and UVA's full-ride lottery).
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Let's hope Georgetown drops out of the T14 and is replaced by Minnesota.TripTrip wrote:I think MN recognized the ubiquitous median slip that is about to happen and is just one of the first schools to set new, realistic goals based on that information.
It feels like a lot of other schools are trying wildly weird tactics to save their medians as much as possible (see G-town's ridiculous scholarship goings-on and UVA's full-ride lottery).
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Love it.reyals wrote:Let's hope Georgetown drops out of the T14 and is replaced by Minnesota.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BitterSplitter
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
And uva'sBitterSplitter wrote:whats going on with GTowns scholarships?TripTrip wrote:I think MN recognized the ubiquitous median slip that is about to happen and is just one of the first schools to set new, realistic goals based on that information.
It feels like a lot of other schools are trying wildly weird tactics to save their medians as much as possible (see G-town's ridiculous scholarship goings-on and UVA's full-ride lottery).
- alwayssunnyinfl
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
UVA seems to be throwing out full rides like candy this year.
GULC pulled a "name your price" strategy. However, a lot of people who requested full rides were told they would get nothing.
Hey Minnesota bros,
If you find my posts insightful and interesting, please go here:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0&t=206264
And vote for Natalie Portman! She needs our help. If you aren't going to vote for her then don't vote at all.
Yours,
AlwaysSunny
GULC pulled a "name your price" strategy. However, a lot of people who requested full rides were told they would get nothing.
Hey Minnesota bros,
If you find my posts insightful and interesting, please go here:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0&t=206264
And vote for Natalie Portman! She needs our help. If you aren't going to vote for her then don't vote at all.
Yours,
AlwaysSunny
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:16 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Got that 84K today in the mail
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
we should start an 84k club.hoogs23 wrote:Got that 84K today in the mail
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
So whos actually strongly considering putting down the deposit and matriculating?
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yup. It's a big game of The Price Is Right going on in DC.alwayssunnyinfl wrote:GULC pulled a "name your price" strategy. However, a lot of people who requested full rides were told they would get nothing.
I totally was, until UCLA came down with their identical offer. Now I'm torn.Nova wrote:So whos actually strongly considering putting down the deposit and matriculating?
- BitterSplitter
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Reading the USC thread, they are trying to stall acceptances til late april/early may. If I don't hear back before the deposit date I'm going to be quite upset.BitterSplitter wrote:Meee!Nova wrote:So whos actually strongly considering putting down the deposit and matriculating?
I'm strongly considering Minnesota because of the scholly, however, I haven't heard back from very many schools yet.
UCLA, however, dinged me. What a great cycle.
- luxurylawyer
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
That's alright, Gophs are about to house them tonight. And as we all know, NCAA tourney supremacy = law school supremacy.reyals wrote: Reading the USC thread, they are trying to stall acceptances til late april/early may. If I don't hear back before the deposit date I'm going to be quite upset.
I'm strongly considering Minnesota because of the scholly, however, I haven't heard back from very many schools yet.
UCLA, however, dinged me. What a great cycle.
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Them throwing me a full ride tilted me more than it excited me. I'm worried that they are going to fuck up their medians and drop out of the T20. With at least in-state at Texas (and maybe more, we shall see) and a Cornell acceptance I'm very much unsure of where I sit. I'm trying to keep my unabashed love of the Twin Cities out of my brain as much as I can.Nova wrote:So whos actually strongly considering putting down the deposit and matriculating?
EDIT: also, big problem is that TLS != reality, but I don't know how much being on here has skewed my evaluations of everything.
- Xs20
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:03 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Who caresromanticegotist wrote:I'm worried that they are going to fuck up their medians and drop out of the T20.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Their medians and their ranking isn't going to change their employment prospects, which for a law school, is pretty good. But debating UT, Minn, and Cornell is a pretty good dilemma to have.Xs20 wrote:Who caresromanticegotist wrote:I'm worried that they are going to fuck up their medians and drop out of the T20.
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yes, my life is just a never-ending stream of First World Problems (then again, I'm a WASPy male going to law school so that comes as a shock to exactly nobody). This would be easier if the thought of leaving Austin, even if it was to go back to Minneapolis, gave me headaches and queso-withdrawal immediately.wannabelawstudent wrote:Their medians and their ranking isn't going to change their employment prospects, which for a law school, is pretty good. But debating UT, Minn, and Cornell is a pretty good dilemma to have.Xs20 wrote:Who caresromanticegotist wrote:I'm worried that they are going to fuck up their medians and drop out of the T20.
Could you point me to stats about their employment outcomes? I never know where to look because you have to cut through the 'these aren't accurate!!!' static to find any actual info.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Thanks. And yeah, it's not looking too bad for Minnesota, at least from what I'm reading on here. Something that I have to remind myself that may be glaringly obvious but is occasionally worth a mention is that looking only at salary in $$ is misleading because 100k/year in Minneapolis takes you way farther than 100k in chicago or NYC (and makes you a minor Lord in places like Omaha or Des Moines).wannabelawstudent wrote:http://www.lawschooltransparency.com/
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I did notice that they were playing each other. Suddenly I care about basketball.luxurylawyer wrote:That's alright, Gophs are about to house them tonight. And as we all know, NCAA tourney supremacy = law school supremacy.reyals wrote: Reading the USC thread, they are trying to stall acceptances til late april/early may. If I don't hear back before the deposit date I'm going to be quite upset.
I'm strongly considering Minnesota because of the scholly, however, I haven't heard back from very many schools yet.
UCLA, however, dinged me. What a great cycle.
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I do like the idea of being a minor Lord...romanticegotist wrote:Thanks. And yeah, it's not looking too bad for Minnesota, at least from what I'm reading on here. Something that I have to remind myself that may be glaringly obvious but is occasionally worth a mention is that looking only at salary in $$ is misleading because 100k/year in Minneapolis takes you way farther than 100k in chicago or NYC (and makes you a minor Lord in places like Omaha or Des Moines).wannabelawstudent wrote:http://www.lawschooltransparency.com/
You'll figure it out dude. You have the advantage of having lived in both cities. Some of us have never lived anywhere nice.
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I did middle and high school in Omaha and I can tell you that a single person making 100k has access to some pretty excellent shit (but Omaha is still quite dull). Well if anyone else is looking at Twin Cities vs. Austin I can tell you that it really is close, but I would say that the people in Austin are friendlier but the city of Minneapolis itself is nicer and easier to get around. Both have great music and great food and lots of excellent outdoor activities. I know a lot of y'all are worried about the snow and the cold but trust me, it won't impact your life as much as you'd expect.reyals wrote:I do like the idea of being a minor Lord...romanticegotist wrote:Thanks. And yeah, it's not looking too bad for Minnesota, at least from what I'm reading on here. Something that I have to remind myself that may be glaringly obvious but is occasionally worth a mention is that looking only at salary in $$ is misleading because 100k/year in Minneapolis takes you way farther than 100k in chicago or NYC (and makes you a minor Lord in places like Omaha or Des Moines).wannabelawstudent wrote:http://www.lawschooltransparency.com/
You'll figure it out dude. You have the advantage of having lived in both cities. Some of us have never lived anywhere nice.
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Basically this. No one is going to move into the Twin Cities market.wannabelawstudent wrote:Their medians and their ranking isn't going to change their employment prospects, which for a law school, is pretty good. But debating UT, Minn, and Cornell is a pretty good dilemma to have.Xs20 wrote:Who caresromanticegotist wrote:I'm worried that they are going to fuck up their medians and drop out of the T20.
Maybe Arizona State, DROVES, etc.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login